Search content
Sort by

Showing 13 of 13 results by BTCMORGAN
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
[ANN] RadiumX New PoW coin . No ICO. No Masternode
by
BTCMORGAN
on 09/11/2022, 21:09:34 UTC

About

RadiumX is a blockchain protection project with the ability to send signed transactions. The project has
fast transactions, low commission for transfers.


In addition, the distinctive features are:
Without premine
Not ico
No bounty programs
Quick access to stock exchanges
Without masternode
As well as many other features, which we describe in the future.
There will be no coin sale. The coins will be mined and available
soon after on several exchanges to be named.
We believe this to be a much fairer way of launching our project.
There will be a maximum of 255 Million coins ever created.


This is Pre launch RadiumX blockchain.


Specification
Coin Name: RadiumX
Symbol: RDX
Coin Type: PoW
Algorithm: X16S
Block Time: 1 Minute
Block Reward: 5000 RDX
Halving Schedule: Every 2.1M Blocks (Approximately every 4 years)
Max Supply: 255 Billion
Block Size: 1MB (scalable)
GPU Minable: Yes
ASIC Resistant: Yes
ICO: No
Pre-mine: No
Founders Reward: No
Masternodes: Soon 20%BR/1M Collateral (MN for infrastructure data layer)
Wallet Address Prefix: P

Wallets
https://github.com/RadiumXblockchain/RadiumX/releases/download/v1.1/RadiumX.zip

Site
radiumxcoin.info (in maintenance)

Explorer & Miner
Integrated in wallet

Mining pools
launch today


Check this topic !
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency
by
BTCMORGAN
on 26/02/2017, 19:13:26 UTC
It's #4 now on Coinmarket cap.  I wish I knew about DASH early on  Cry Cry
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] AMP - The Currency That Powers Your Attention On Synereo
by
BTCMORGAN
on 21/02/2017, 05:40:56 UTC
Like 5months Ago I was bought this shit coin and I invest like 90 btc and I bought from 34000 satoshi and now I have only 15 btc never i believe like this project. Never buy AMP never invest because only on Market have 80 million and also Have Dor like 900 million AMP i don't believe also crowdsale is right they make all shit they fuck all investors. I want thanx NXC because after AMP i invest nxc now what I lose from amp I won from NXC I'm telling never invest never
Its the biggest scam of the year its terrible

Agreed.  Thankfully, I only lost 1 BTC to this scam coin and immediately reinvested what I cashed out with into DASH which has doubled my investment.   There are many factors that point to that scumbag Dor pumping his own coin to its highest valuation during the 2nd ICO to milk investors out of much BTC as possible and then dumping right after the ICO was over.  Plus I know people that have met Dor personally and have told me that he only has a goal of enriching himself as quick as possible. 

Lesson learned here is before you invest in a coin, do some research on the developers themselves and try to meet them in person if you can.   Dor has proven how untrustworthy he is time and time again.  This coin is going nowhere and Dor is counting on prolonging the "development" as much as possible so that people forget about it and move on, while he gets away with the 5 mill he stole.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Calculating Z Values for a Bitcoin Transaction
by
BTCMORGAN
on 20/02/2017, 06:31:09 UTC
I know this has been likely asked before, but I've done research and can't seem to find
an answer that allows a non-technical person such as myself to simply do this.
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/32628/redeeming-a-raw-transaction-step-by-step-example-required/32695#32695
step 14

Is there a script (E.g.python) that I could use to automatically calculate the Z values?

What do you mean by "automatically calculate"?
Who would provide the transaction for a script?

What Z value? There is no value in a Bitcoin transaction or in ECDSA signatures that is called "Z".
ECDSA digest for signing


Thanks Amaclin!  This is what I was looking for and its good explanation.  Is there any code that can do this automatically by pulling a transaction ID off the blockchain (which would import the details)?
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Topic OP
Calculating Z Values for a Bitcoin Transaction
by
BTCMORGAN
on 19/02/2017, 18:23:23 UTC
I know this has been likely asked before, but I've done research and can't seem to find an answer that allows a non-technical person such as myself to simply do this.

Is there a script (E.g.python) that I could use to automatically calculate the Z values?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers
by
BTCMORGAN
on 19/02/2017, 14:50:44 UTC
I sold my Lisk a while back for more than 2x what its worth.  Looking back it seems to have been a good decision as it appears Lisk is continuing its long downward spiral.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Help! Bitcoin Transactions Stuck in Unconfirmed > 16 hours
by
BTCMORGAN
on 06/02/2017, 21:51:08 UTC
I'll put these through on viabtc but usually if the fee is too low you're going to just have to wait and pray on one of the confirmations coming into this transcation, sucks but that's how it works.

I did it on both of them and it succeed and you can try it here if you'd like too, just take everything after /TX/ in the two links you provided.
VIABTC - https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/

Thanks  Hardtime.  I appreciate the help but I already tried  viabtc hours ago and it said that they were successful as you indicated, but for some reason, they still won't get confirmed. I'm just hoping it's not some sort of technical issue and they're going to be stuck in limbo forever.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Topic OP
Help! Bitcoin Transactions Stuck in Unconfirmed > 16 hours
by
BTCMORGAN
on 06/02/2017, 21:44:34 UTC
Here are two transaction which I placed one minute apart yesterday that are still stuck as unconfirmed for over 16 hours now.  I inputted them into viabtc 6 hours ago to speed them to no avail.   What options do I have to push them through?   It is very bizarre because all the transactions I made an hour prior to that have over 80 confirmations.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

https://blockchain.info/tx/ac3373979bc666364bf6368010d51fc3350a97c77fb29797cae139c04aba85af

https://blockchain.info/tx/0c095eb5b70138e6547c07a577ee9e27a112e252d862c90f3de134cdf03da24c


Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: New Weak Signature Challenge
by
BTCMORGAN
on 03/02/2017, 05:41:52 UTC
So its like https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1306983.0;all

except with very little reward

Note: I sent a message about this transaction in few hours after it was broadcasted.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=932434.0


Is there a website that simplifies the process of computing the private key from a weak signature?
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: WINGS ★ Where DAO Unicorns Are Born! ★ {18.11.2016 - 06.01.2016}
by
BTCMORGAN
on 25/12/2016, 21:52:10 UTC
Quote from: MFahad
Disclaimer: I was not aware of the stupid allocation rules when investing. In fact, I actually didn't want to invest with BTC but with ETH, but then there was some stupid exclusive bonus for BTC investors. MISLEADING!

Example:
1 BTC investment (=$908) gives me 33,322 Wings
867.7 ETC investment (=$908) gives me 247,326 Wings

That's more than 7 times more WINGS for the same amount of dollars in value!


You may get 7 times more WINGS if you invest in ETC now... but remember that the final calculations will rely on current total funds collected. Estimations will change as new funds are received. See terms & conditions for further details.


That's a freake'n scandal.......Why won't you give us a statement on the subject??
This is not the way to go with your first investors.

Yes, but no one will not change rules during game. It will not be fair to users who have carefully read whitepaper.

It's not about changing the rules, its about proving yourself to be fair and trustworthy. It's about understanding their true motivations and intentions as to the people giving them funds and to the future of the project itself. Many manufacturers of products make unintentional mistakes with pricing, but still go out and correct them in order to gain consumer trust, the people they need to actually make them successful.  

Given the lack of response from anyone from the WINGS team on this and how they've decided to dangle the public calculator in everyone's faces now to show the imbalance, this seems to be a ploy to get more $$$ out of the BTC investors in order to level off the imbalance- as their other marketing tactics seem to be failing to get them more $$$ from new investors.   This paints their intentions as greedy and untrustworthy.  What's to stop them from also dangling the "donation" clause as someone earlier mentioned right after the ICO is over and say gee, we've decided to no longer continue this project, did your read the abandonment clause thank you for your generous donations this holiday season??

If they actually came out and said that this was unintentional and they will correct the allocation at the end in order to make it fair to everyone that invested, then I would actually invest more because they would prove themselves to be trustworthy.  As I said, a minor imbalance, I can understand, but 7X is seriously unacceptable and unfair.

Again, its all about character and intention which seems to be nefarious.  At this point, I am requesting someone from the WINGS team to please refund me my BTC as I am no longer interested in this project.  To investors sitting on the sideline, I would not recommend investing in this project at this point.  I will also be emailing Smith & Crown and ICORATING.COM and notifying them of this situation and hopefully, this will deter people from getting screwed over.   If you are a BTC investor, please stand up and speak up!!!



The intention is that the foundation has a good allocation of various coins. So that it is not at the mercy of the volatile crypto markets



Wings.AI. Then the way you attempted to to execute this good allocation was clearly wrong- because the actual outcome was a  severe bad allocation to your BTC investors by a huge magnitude.  I believe that you can agree the you did not intend this outcome based on your claimed intention of a fair allocation.  Correct?  If so, then you need to correct your execution in order achieve your initial intention of a fair allocation which is what you are claiming all along.  

Secondly, The issue  is further magnified by the fact that you created the appearance of an  additional  incentive for early investors in BTC in the beginning which clearly has backfired and the outcome now is the exact opposite of your claimed intentions. is this the impression you want to give us?  Think about it.  Trust is an important thing.  Fix this and you will send a strong message to the people on the sidelines that you are trustworthy and willing to correct mistakes to deliver on your true intentions.

As I've mentioned, many people are sitting on the sidelines watching to see what happens.  If you screw over your current investors, whether intentional or unintentional, then you are sending a strong message that you are only looking out for yourselves and don't have the best intentions of investors.   Which message do you chose to send?

Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: WINGS ★ Where DAO Unicorns Are Born! ★ {18.11.2016 - 06.01.2016}
by
BTCMORGAN
on 25/12/2016, 20:35:33 UTC
Quote from: MFahad
Disclaimer: I was not aware of the stupid allocation rules when investing. In fact, I actually didn't want to invest with BTC but with ETH, but then there was some stupid exclusive bonus for BTC investors. MISLEADING!

Example:
1 BTC investment (=$908) gives me 33,322 Wings
867.7 ETC investment (=$908) gives me 247,326 Wings

That's more than 7 times more WINGS for the same amount of dollars in value!


You may get 7 times more WINGS if you invest in ETC now... but remember that the final calculations will rely on current total funds collected. Estimations will change as new funds are received. See terms & conditions for further details.


That's a freake'n scandal.......Why won't you give us a statement on the subject??
This is not the way to go with your first investors.

Yes, but no one will not change rules during game. It will not be fair to users who have carefully read whitepaper.

It's not about changing the rules, its about proving yourself to be fair and trustworthy. It's about understanding their true motivations and intentions as to the people giving them funds and to the future of the project itself. Many manufacturers of products make unintentional mistakes with pricing, but still go out and correct them in order to gain consumer trust, the people they need to actually make them successful. 

Given the lack of response from anyone from the WINGS team on this and how they've decided to dangle the public calculator in everyone's faces now to show the imbalance, this seems to be a ploy to get more $$$ out of the BTC investors in order to level off the imbalance- as their other marketing tactics seem to be failing to get them more $$$ from new investors.   This paints their intentions as greedy and untrustworthy.  What's to stop them from also dangling the "donation" clause as someone earlier mentioned right after the ICO is over and say gee, we've decided to no longer continue this project, did your read the abandonment clause thank you for your generous donations this holiday season??

If they actually came out and said that this was unintentional and they will correct the allocation at the end in order to make it fair to everyone that invested, then I would actually invest more because they would prove themselves to be trustworthy.  As I said, a minor imbalance, I can understand, but 7X is seriously unacceptable and unfair.

Again, its all about character and intention which seems to be nefarious.  At this point, I am requesting someone from the WINGS team to please refund me my BTC as I am no longer interested in this project.  To investors sitting on the sideline, I would not recommend investing in this project at this point.  I will also be emailing Smith & Crown and ICORATING.COM and notifying them of this situation and hopefully, this will deter people from getting screwed over.   If you are a BTC investor, please stand up and speak up!!!

Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: WINGS ★ Where DAO Unicorns Are Born! ★ {18.11.2016 - 06.01.2016}
by
BTCMORGAN
on 25/12/2016, 04:11:47 UTC
Thanks for the calculator, but this is HORRIBLE. I can get more than 7 times more Wings with ETC than with BTC. Now I feel like I wasted my 5 BTC on this crowdfund (I could've spent 7 times less using some shitcoin and get the same amount of WINGS!). So don't give me this BS trying to justify this. This whole cryptocurrency allocation thing is a big FAIL and you know it.  I get that you guys were expecting some sort of equilibrium, but it is not going to happen (ESPECIALLY IF YOU HAVE A VERY MISLEADING ***EXCLUSIVE*** BONUS FOR BTC INVESTMENTS)! Please change the design and just allocate Wings based on $ value invested, otherwise this is a big FAIL and I have wasted 5 BTC. I feel really pissed off.

Disclaimer: I was not aware of the stupid allocation rules when investing. In fact, I actually didn't want to invest with BTC but with ETH, but then there was some stupid exclusive bonus for BTC investors. MISLEADING!

Example:
1 BTC investment (=$908) gives me 33,322 Wings
867.7 ETC investment (=$908) gives me 247,326 Wings

That's more than 7 times more WINGS for the same amount of dollars in value!

Of course I know that it wasn't your intention to get a situation like this. But this situation is reality now and you have to agree that it is massively unfair! I suggest to fix this poor ICO design, because this is just wrong. Please change WINGS allocation based on $ value invested, it is the only way to fix this big mess.

EDIT:
Thanks guys, now I felt like I had to invest 1 BTC worth of ETC to increase my WINGS/$ invested ratio, just so that I feel scammed just a little bit less.

WTF?Huh? I also invested almost 3 BTC in this. This situation is completely fucked up.  Why do they only now choose to put the calculator on their ICO site and not before???  They clearly misled us with the 30% initial bonus.   I would understand if there is a minor imbalance, but by 7X?  This is completely unacceptable!!

WINGS.AI.  HOW THE HELL DO YOU EXPECT PEOPLE TO CONTINUE INVESTING IF YOU HAVE ALREADY PROVEN YOURSELF UNTRUSTWORTHY!!! PLEASE RECTIFY THIS IMBALANCE  BY ALLOCATING THE AMOUNT OF WINGS TO EACH COIN PROPORTIONAL TO THE AMOUNT INVESTED AT THE END OF THE ICO.   AS OTHERS HERE ARE DEMANDING, PLEASE RESPOND AS TO HOW YOU WILL CORRECT THIS IMBALANCE.  

YOU DO REALIZE THAT MANY PEOPLE ARE WAITING ON THE SIDELINES TO INVEST BASED ON HOW THIS ICO UNFOLDS?  IF YOU PLAN TO SCREW OVER THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT TRUSTED YOU WITH THE ALLOCATION, THEN HOW DO YOU EXPECT FUTURE INVESTORS TO TRUST YOU??   PLEASE DO WHAT'S RIGHT AND PROVE THAT YOU ARE TRUSTWORTHY.  OTHERWISE, PLEASE REFUND MY BTC.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [ETC] Ethereum Classic: Immutable Smart Contracts
by
BTCMORGAN
on 25/12/2016, 03:56:07 UTC
How many of you guys think ETC will surpass ETH?