Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 79 results by Bathmat
What is Phoenix Miner reporting as the hashrate for each rig? Did you switch to compute mode? Did you mod the GPU BIOS with timing straps or use strap injection? Did you set core and memory clocks for mining or just using stock clocks? There are more steps required to get 30Mh/s than just turn the miner on and let it run.
After finding the compute mode setting, and restarting the mining in compute mode, my hashrates have gone up to 19-23Mh/s, each rig is slightly different. These hashrates are much more in-line with what I was expecting. This was the piece of info I was missing.
Thank you!
No problem. From your other question, yes, by setting core and memory clock, I meant overclocking the GPU. Although, for ETH you probably want over clock the memory and under clock the core. Even with stock timings, you can get around 24-25Mh/s per GPU with the correct clocks. There are several guides on how to start mining (some even in this forum), if you just do a little searching and research.
am on the latest version 28.1 beta with AMD 470, I have 4 of them. I start the miner and my hashrate is showing n/a on all 4 video cards and they are doing nothing. MY GPU's are in compute mode and they mine ETH fine with Pheonix. When I try to install Microsoft Visual 64 it will not install because it says that I have a newer version already installed. Could this possibly be the problem. Here is my script to start minus the wallet address and I have gave the EXE admin privileges;
wildrig.exe --print-full --algo progpow-veil --opencl-threads auto --opencl-launch auto --url veil.us.woolypooly.com:3098 --user WalletAddress.dagereGPU --pass x
Anythouts why they will not compute...I see no errors
Try --user WalletAddress without specifying a rig name, since I guess you don't even get any "new job" message in miner?wildrig.exe --print-full --algo progpow-veil --opencl-threads auto --opencl-launch auto --url veil.us.woolypooly.com:3098 --user WalletAddress.dagereGPU --pass x
Anythouts why they will not compute...I see no errors
Did what you said and still the same
Did you use a basecoin address (starts with "bv") and not a stealth address (starts with "sv")?
https://woolypooly.medium.com/how-to-mine-veil-full-mining-guide-6d8a72914377
Re: [Tool] AMD-Compute-Switcher for switch automatically to compute mode
I saw that i have a comment in this thread wayback 2018 in the high demand of mining, but i tried this one as of this moment with the latest radeon driver, seems it's good because the tools pop up and says that it was successful, but when i run the miner nothing changes, the 3 cards that i\ve been set to compute mode manually work well and increase the hashrate, while the others remain 10MH, I am using rx 570 4gb cards, does the dev of this tools have a latest update?
I've used this tool after every driver install/update and it's worked on each one I've tried including 20.4.2.
Re: T-Rex 0.16.1 NVIDIA GPU miner with web monitoring page and auto-updates
⭐ Merited by xandry (2)
Running cuda 11 decreased my hashrate without --mt. I'm unable to get it to run with --mt as Administrator through my batch file. Error ... not recognized as an internal or external command. So I'm back to T-REX 0.15.8 Running MTP algo win 10.
When you run as admin it changes your folder to the Windows\system32 folder. You have to change directory back to your folder with the miner to launch it. Basic windows command line navigation stuff....
Hi.
Has anyone tried mining with Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT BE? https://www.sapphiretech.com/en/consumer/pulse-radeon-rx-5600-xt-be-6g-gddr6
Compared to regular Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT, BE version have lower boost clock and no Quick Connect Fan / Dual BIOS.
I am planning to build a rig with 6x RX 5600XT and this Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT BE is the cheapest one I could find in my country.
Which one would you recommend to buy?
Has anyone tried mining with Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT BE? https://www.sapphiretech.com/en/consumer/pulse-radeon-rx-5600-xt-be-6g-gddr6
Compared to regular Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT, BE version have lower boost clock and no Quick Connect Fan / Dual BIOS.
I am planning to build a rig with 6x RX 5600XT and this Sapphire Pulse RX 5600 XT BE is the cheapest one I could find in my country.
Which one would you recommend to buy?
I think the BE also has not as robust cooling. Might be worth the extra cost for the better cooling on the non-BE version.
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.7.1 - Kawpow/Ethash/Cryptonight/Chukwa Thread
I didn't understand, why all start to mine kawpow. It uses more power. Eth algo gives more profit.
Like pbfarmer said, RVN looked significantly sexier just a few days ago. It's also a very fresh algo addition in TRM as well with the new release, and imho the first and only public progpow implementation for AMD so far that can compete with Team Green, especially for the 7nm gpus like VIIs and Navis.
Right now, and if you trust whattomine and with some ballpark nrs for $0.06/kwh, a VII doing 80 MH/s ethash at 180W and 40 MH/s kawpow at 300W gets you $1.26 net for kawpow and $1.04 net for plain ETH. Nicehash ethash says net $1.21, but imho it's hard to realize the full 100% of your hashrate on Nicehash due to rejects. Now, change those $0.06/kwh to $0.10/kwh and it most definitely shifts into ethash being the best choice. My point is more that there are situations where kawpow is a rational choice, but yeah, for most people there are other factors to take into account (power cost, heat/cooling etc).
Also, it's good to be able to run multiple algos on a GPU in case profit shifts or you do want to mine multiple coins. After all, that is one of the reasons to have GPU rigs instead of just getting an ASIC. Variety being the spice of life and whatnot.
Re: [ANN] TeamRedMiner 0.7.1 - Kawpow/Ethash/Cryptonight/Chukwa Thread
Awesome release! Really good results with Navi 5700:
5700XT:
- KawPOW: 21-22Mh/s using 1275/900/750mV pulling 150W at the wall (beats RTX 2070 SUPER in H/W which does about 23Mh/s at 190W)
- ETH: 51.1Mh/s using 1275/900/750mV (stock timings) pulling 130W at the wall
(Win10 1903, drivers: 19.11.3)
Great work as always!
5700XT:
- KawPOW: 21-22Mh/s using 1275/900/750mV pulling 150W at the wall (beats RTX 2070 SUPER in H/W which does about 23Mh/s at 190W)
- ETH: 51.1Mh/s using 1275/900/750mV (stock timings) pulling 130W at the wall
(Win10 1903, drivers: 19.11.3)
Great work as always!
Warning!
I do not know what this is, but surely not a fork of lolMiner - I did no where release any of my sources. Beside: none of the algorithms listed mentioned is supported by lolMiner, but the hashrates seem to fit to cuckoo style algorithms (that are not listed)
-> THIS COULD BE FAKE and I can not recommend downloading it unless you got a good sandbox and no wallet or something like that running in this sandbox.
I do not know what this is, but surely not a fork of lolMiner - I did no where release any of my sources. Beside: none of the algorithms listed mentioned is supported by lolMiner, but the hashrates seem to fit to cuckoo style algorithms (that are not listed)
-> THIS COULD BE FAKE and I can not recommend downloading it unless you got a good sandbox and no wallet or something like that running in this sandbox.
Also, the reported speeds are for some sort of Cuckaroo algo, but none of those are listed as supported algos.
Likely, malware. DO NOT DOWNLOAD.
Re: lolMiner 0.9.8: Improved C29M performance & Beam on Navi (Feb 24th)
Sorry for the recent silence - needed to do some other work, but will be back soon.
The next bigger release for lolMiner will likely be 1.0 ... so well ...
Since this is going to be something special I would like to ask you: what are the features that you urgently miss in lolMiner Let me know 
The next bigger release for lolMiner will likely be 1.0 ... so well ...
Since this is going to be something special I would like to ask you: what are the features that you urgently miss in lolMiner
Let me know GPU temps both in console output and API.
Re: lolMiner 0.9.5 Grin Fork support + Better C31 performance (Jan 14th)
Just tested the new version: nice improvement for Navi on Windows. Also, I'm using 19.9.2 without any issues so far.
GPU settings: 1500/875/825mV (~100W gpu only power draw), averaging ~1.05 gps per Navi (up from around 0.93 gps)
GPU settings: 1500/875/825mV (~100W gpu only power draw), averaging ~1.05 gps per Navi (up from around 0.93 gps)
Check the `Base priority` in Windows Task manager. Depending how you launch the miner, it may end up with `Below normal`. I had that issue which was causing hashrate drops and dead threads for me. Here is where I was able to solve it: Github issue
Re: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux)
Do we see AMD releasing new 5700 XT drivers to allow us to use all 40 compute units? Miner is only seeing 20.
Thank you for the great software!
Thank you for the great software!
It might just be a syntax error.
In actual, It is using all the computational power there is to get the max possible hash rate.
I have seen people getting 62 MH/s with 5700 XT.
Everything I've seen boasting greater than 54Mh/s have been changing the OpenCL worksize and causing invalid shares that reduce effective hashrate back down to around 50-54Mh/s.
Re: PhoenixMiner 4.6c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux)
AMD released 19.10.1 drivers. Anyone tried allready? Miner support them?
Quote
Support For:
AMD Radeon RX 5500 desktop graphics products
AMD Radeon RX 5500M mobile graphics products
AMD Radeon RX 5500 desktop graphics products
AMD Radeon RX 5500M mobile graphics products
Looks like it's just an update to add new GPUs, so it will likely work, but nothing to be gained.
Re: PhoenixMiner 4.6c: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux)
I've noticed an issue where at least 1 of my RX5700 will crash after switching to ETC when mining on Nicehash. The crash happens after a few minutes (less than 10) and they will crash even if it's only a brief switch to ETC then back to ETH. Mining to a regular ETC pool does not have any issues. I've tried every config setting/flag I can think of to try to prevent it (-eres 0 -rvram -1 -lidag 0 through 3), and both drivers 19.9.1 and 19.9.2. This is using version 4.6c. Any other setting I should try?
So I had this happen again while just mining ETH to a regular ETH pool. Everything was fine, stable and had been running for over 28 hours. Then, a DAG switch occurred (updating to the next ETH DAG) and between 9 and 10 minutes later, one of the GPUs (RX 5700 XT) stopped working and the miner would have restarted, but I had -rmode 0 to see if/when it would crash. Any thoughts on this?
any help guy's i need a miner without a toolkit or codeset like " cuda "
You could try xmrig-amd and set `--opencl-platform` to the nVidia platform