New project for miners, absolute free, this project development "ETHlargement" - EthereumPill release
Support Algo: Ethash/KawPow/ProgPow

More info: https://github.com/ProjectEthereumPill/EthereumPill/releases/tag/1.1.0

Hashrate:
1080ti - 58 mh/s
2060 - 59 mh/s
2070 - 60-62 mh/s
2080 - 63-67 mh/s
2080ti - 68-71 mh/s
3070 - 76-78 mh/s
3080 - 97-99 mh/s
3090 - 115-127 mh/s

P.S.: the project is being drowned by competitors, don't trust anyone, check the information yourself

OMG, so many responses! Thank you all for your opinion.

You're right, almost everything was advised to me on Telegram. I agree that these projects are not the same as cryptocurrencies like ETH or EOS. But I believe that they will give a good return on minimum capital.
So I decide to take a chance. promise invest not too much for them haha

Thank you so much! I will look into this.

Unfortunately, the top 20 does not provide such a profit(
There is no money without risk

As far as I understand, paramining will not work on the exchange. Thats why you will have to withdraw coins to the wallet. There is an official one, so everything is fine.

I agree with you about Ethereum, Monero, Litecoin
But Ripple, BHC and Dogecoin don't inspire confidence in me.
XRP is constantly sold by developers. The creators of BCH themselves are not very trustworthy guysthemselves. And Doge is constantly pumped by Elon Musk) I don't know what would have happened to the coin without him..
P.S.: awesome nickname!)

I've heard a lot about it. Thanks for your feedback.

The main capital is directed to the Coinmarketcap tops, with a few exceptions. But I also need more risky and unusual assets for a small fraction of my funds.

Why do you think I wanna rock this coin to save my investment? Since listing, QOOB has already fly up by 600%.
I still haven't invested in any of these coins and really regret that I didn't buy a QOOB at 0.60 cents. I was looking for a project with passive income, and can double my capital in a week just for easy lol)

Hi, mates!

I am forming an investment portfolio for the next six months and want to invest part of the funds to accrual it not by increasing the exchange rate.

There are few options here. I set out to compare all existing projects that offer regular passive income. By "passive", I mean pos-mining or something like that - not pyramid scams with restrictions on withdrawal in half a year.

Prizm immediately came to mind, but I personally have only one thought about this name in my head – financial losses. The idea of the project is not bad, but now it is just nothing. They also advised UMI, OURO, and Decimal in chats, but I haven't seen such unpromising and underdeveloped projects for a long time…

I was advised only with two interesting things: YodaX and QOOBER.

QOOBER was praised as a real panacea in the telegram chat as a real silver bullet. I rejected the YodaX project immediately because of the subtleties of its trading and the impossibility of withdrawal.

QOOBER is also a piece of work, it is not so easy to find any qualitative information about it. The first impression - it is something raw and not interesting at the moment.Their coin brought some ambiguity in my attitude toward it. The dynamics of its cost growth exactly. It is not traded on the stock exchange for a week, and has almost made X3 with a daily trading volume of 50K+ dollars.

The question is: what the f***?!? Who has been buying it in such quantities all this time? Btcalpha chat only talks about it. And some transactions are constantly float around the blockchain. According to their Twitter – they had a large round of pre-financing and the community of the project is quite extensive and wealthy, but apparently private.

From a technical point of view, they are in no way inferior to everything I have read about, normal paramining conditions and an incredibly fast-growing coin. But the amount of available information is simply amazing. In negative sense, of course. Who knows something about the project? Any resources and links other than Twitter and the official site.

Hi, is it possible the latest drivers don't like the PPT, or at least the old(Hellea) PPT. I have had same issue with V64, with newer drivers TRM crashes with PPT installed but is fine with no PPT. Exact symptoms are either the ramp up sequence gets stuck at some level, 90-95% or thread on V64 dies and TRM cannot be exited, needs hardware reset.

lol! all the useless leeches bleating "Gimme,Gimme! I'm incapable of actually doing anything difficult and need spoon feeding!"

Manually starting the dhclient got a connection

Fucking useless piece of shit.
Cant connect rig and the resulting errors messages are just a ton of gibberish.
No help on telegram

I see no difference with the hybrid version over standard version, neither better or worse
CPU usage is virtually nil, I think I dont understand configuration for the hybrid version.
Experimenting with one Vega 64 on 8 core xeon, no 1x risers.

Sorry, where is the B-X version?

Fantastic jobs guys!
You have completely eliminated the drop in profitability that the fork from CN/1 to CN/2 introduced.
4x Vegas making 8000+ h/s @ 840W

Cheers!

Baz

I think you are using the wrong word when you say multimeter, you can measure the power with one but you  have to make two measurements, the voltage and then the current and then multiply them together to get power in watts.
Are you using a meter that plugs into a wall socket and then you plug the lead for the mining rig into the meter? Thats a wattmeter, or Killawatt.
The efficiency of the psu is significant. With a 80% psu there is a 20% difference from input to output. So adding up the gpus and cpu and other system power will always be 20% lower than the power measured on the mains input. If all the gpus and stuff added up to say 1000 watts, the input power would read as 1200, 20% higher.

Baz

Yeah, dont.

You dont invest in crypto, you gamble.
You cant give any meaningful ROI times.
You cant give any meaningful monthly return forcasts.
GPU or ASIC? will it zig or will it zag? Who knows?
Ask yourself this, if you had to go and tell your investors all the money is gone, what would their reaction be?

Baz

How exactly are you measuring the input power with your multi-meter? Do you know what power factor is? The power monitor functions for GPUs is notoriously inaccurate. What is the efficiency of your PC PSU?
All these things make accurate accounting for power difficult. No way are your CPU and risers and other system components using 680W.

Baz

Any new device that bumps up the network hash rate significantly will depress the value by the same amount.
You cannot figure ROI for a new device with figures from pre-launch of that device.
It doesn't matter if its ASIC, FPGA or GPU.
Higher hashrate DOES NOT mean higher income.
Increasing YOUR hashrate with respects to the network hashrate is the only way to increase YOUR income.
This is because block creation is managed by the difficulty mechanism to produce blocks in a fixed time period.
All higher hashrate devices do is increase difficulty.
Sadly, mining is a competitive endeavour, you are competing with your fellow miners.
If you do better relative to them, you gain.
This means miners must keep up with the latest and greatest hardware or perish.
Obviously people have different budgets and more expensive hardware becomes out of reach of more and more miners.
Until people realize all this and just jump at the newest tech at any expense, everyone will suffer.
Well, at least until repetitive investment in new tech fails to improve return.
Its got to worse, before it gets better.
The only people getting rich in a gold rush are those selling picks and shovels.
Reality bites.
Sorry to put a downer on mining.

Baz

What a horrible experience trying to set Hive OS is.
Absolutely no flow of one step to the next, the programmers have no idea what its like to placed in front of the UI for the first time and try to fathom what the hell is going on.
Its bad guys really BAD

Baz

Yeah its just you.

That 4x slower statement is only true when an FPGA is running the whole algo.
Acorns assist GPU mining by taking over the parts that GPUs are less capable at.
So its not definite one way or the other in the case of Acorn acceleration,
IF there is any part of CNv2 that can be done faster on an FPGA, then an Acorn can improve the GPU miner.
So far from what I've read about CNv2 it has parts in the algo that ASIC or FPGA can not process as well as a CPU or GPU.
That will make implementing CNv2 on ASIC or FPGA not viable, economically.
Or at the very least no massive performance gain over a GPU, levelling the field for GPU miners.
That still leaves the possibility that GPU/FPGA combo might have an advantage over any single technology implementation.
How far it is possible to exclude FPGA from mining is unknown at the moment, I think the competition has only just begun.

Baz

Hi, I have an issue with the latest versions of GPU miner. If you restart the miner it only report s temp and fan speed for one GPU, in my case number 4 of 4 Rx Vegas. The first three are 56s and the fourth a 64. All versions that have the hardware monitoring do this.

Baz

I'm guessing here but, considering its only a software change to  Squirrels miner app, just like GPU mining apps,
it is hardly any different/difficult than everyone has to go through with coin algos forking.
The Acorn device might need its bitstream updating with a new algo, which will be like a firmware upgrade.
No big deal.

Massage with each other?!?!?!?
evolution or evaluation??

sets a new low in shit coin launches