shoul I order via PM, mail or the shop site, please?
danke und verbleibe mfg

http://www.bitcointrezor.com/news/raspberry-pi-shield-developers

no need comment
btw who else is going to ohm2013?

wow, round from hell ; )
7 hrs w/o a block
i know variance and luck/probability, nothing to worry, but it's interesting to watch

same here. be prepared to "renew the order " one more time when he finally commits himself to accept orders. reading carefully the whole thread again and he nowhere writes that he would send to or respect orders he did not confirmed.
if you did not received a reply with order/miner count confirmation than be prepared to  post again "when instructed to do so"

geschah vor 2+ wochen. wirklich 'keine zeit'? fc koennte besser kommunizieren aber ist nicht alleine schuld

wieviele hat er den bestellt und wann?

I can send you a redeemed 1 btc coin from 2011

Hi, I can send you 1 series 2012. your offer OK

thank you very much, received the token today. surprisingly fast delivery

Hi, I don't know what to do with the chip credits, will not buy 100 chips and do not need the coupons.
you can make me an offer via pm or a post here. In the meantime I'll crawl the forum for past deals to find an appropriate ask.

users with better web of trust ranking than me can offer paypal. default preferred payment method is btc
:)

11.2 btc

oh! habe dies verpasst. hoffe es klappt : ))

try:

I'm not their spokesperson but I guess it's the university researchers (prof & his students) working on their papers and this is the implementation. I wonder if they heard of testnet and bothered to add a flag to run on testnet before potentially destroying real coins

of course you can run those in a datacenter and connect remotely to them. ssh and web+https start on boot. forum users suggest that 40 usb asic miners (block eruptors) can run on a single raspberry.

I did not understand why to include a second R pi, thus did not answer earlier, did not make sense. there is no way how the second one would take over the mining coordination in case of the failure of the first one.

thought on coin control and selection of inputs:
hi jim, i think no need to worry about developing the perfect feature, just allow selecting an address that should be used for sure in the payment.

if the balance is not enough, let the app chose other inputs as usual. as long as the funds are send in the same transaction, it can be proved that the one of the source addresses was chosen by the user, he can sign the group buy message with the chosen address/key and the rest of the payment comes from his wallet, so no more issues.
(if I can sign for one address used as input, i'm also able to sign with other addresses, just makes no sense to go through all the loops).

tl;dr; just pick an address that must be used for outgoing payment, the rest is already there.

\o/

3.710004

3.1

good luck selling. i'm confident that sooner or later you'll find a buyer

just want to point out that there were not so many 10.000 btc transactions around May 22 2010, their count rhymes with none. it just so happens that the transaction did happen and everything else is signed tx after tx in the public domain.
"we all know how to check the transaction history" in blockchain. I only have 3.50 of those so can not bid more than fractions of that.