yep, just finished forking the wallet. A bit behind schedule but things are looking good. I'll post here when new source and binaries are up.

I have hired a freelancer who is better at BBCode to make the announcement page look less like crap. You should see that update in a few days. Funds for yobit listing are secured and are scheduled to be submitted around the end of the month.

Less then two hour left before the wallet release!
By the way, we almost sold every Masternode and Dualnode from presale! Ready to be listed 

Shady project so far...I'll still keep it on the watch list. This won't make it mainstream if developers remain anonymous. And if they have nothing to hide, there's no reason to stay anon. Main reason investors get pissed off is from disappearing acts, which most often happens with anon dev teams. Been in crypto for too long and lost too much not to know this.

just came across this coin, looks interesting. How much is a masternode, and will the developers stay anonymous? I tend to stay away from coins with anonymous developers but this looks interesting with great specs. Also how will you guys solve the scalability issue

Nope, when STRAKS announced they were changing the deadline on the burn date I immediately sold my SIGT and tripled my BTC value elsewhere. Happy I'm out.

today received 0.00010000 STAK from burned signatum.
thats it or just some testings ? every day like 0.00010000 STAK ?

I am an early adopter, I join the platform days after launch and bought MC at Cryptopia, I donated plays and tip artists I liked... Back them the wallet was working just fine, after the update it gets 5 to 25 peers and it gets stocked at 25%.
Do we have a Slack group or all the chatting happens here?

Maybe it';s kinda out of topic or just a noob question, After the chain hitted the 100k blocks POS will start, and what will happen if the POS started? meaning it ends to the miners? just asking this kind of nonsense or it make sense question.. lol!   

   That's the biggest flaw in altcoins, just abandon & start a new one leaving a wake of defunct coins? I don't mind new alts, but leaving one to go defunct & starting a new one that might be bound to end the same exact way? Very strange that anyone would think it would be easier to launch a new one with all the work getting listed on sites & building another community? They do though, but most of those types of developers can get listed anywhere very easy & others either spend crazy amounts of BTC or spend months getting a community voting. Either way, just seems like people like ghost towns in this forum & would rather abandon to build new than build upon something working? Don't get me wrong, some of the alts did have broken chains & or had to many faults. Just don't see that with most of them, some chains work & don't have to be abandoned.

anybody working on this coin or is it done?
the wallet and staking is working good

https://www.coinexchange.io/withdrawals/page/1
Time    Coin    Amount    Fee    Receiving Address / txid    Status
2017-04-11 12:36:08    FCH    1655.81085748    0.01000000    FKLtDstrWnUxZZMzpzEwZkweRiqX9d329n n/a    Pending

//thought I'd pick up a little FCH to help the network stake when needed, but coinexchange never sent them & has been pending for a few weeks now?

Looking better a lot of buying! Maybe a come back, time will tell!

I still hold all of the air drop of 1000, staked it to around 1700 & would be more than willing to create a new ANN | OP thread to save FCH?