Yes I triple checked all info Awesome miner shows I can connect to some but pool won't accept shares Nor does Zerge work same problem can connect but will not accept shares
Nor do any of the P2 pools above work. All links are dead pools
Hard-fork to occur at block height 588672 (approximately Aug 18th, 2018). Please upgrade now!
This is the best release yet! In-line with the vision of on-chain scaling, beating all other Bitcoins hands-down!
The biggest changes of the new release are:
Making the difficulty adjustment algo faster and more reactive to hashrate changes
1-minute block-times!!! (increasing the network's capacity by 10x)
The block-rewards are adopted accordingly to the new block-time.
The new block-times & improved DAA will take effect after the hard-fork set to occur at block height 588672 (approximately Aug 18th, 2018). Please upgrade your nodes/wallets now.
"including some devs want to try scaling and privacy on-chain without all the frauds and lunatics of BCH"
Can see this being useful. Have long thought of litecoin as sort of a testnet for Bitcoin. BCH is something different entirely, with many Bitcoin supporters are turned off by it. Devs will feel more comfortable tinkering with this new coin vs. BCH. Would be nice to see more tinkering and less trolling, but the market will decide.
We loathe the fork market. Our tool is mostly used by maximalists that are thinking something along the lines of "I can't believe how lucky I am that the market values cheap copies of Bitcoin with positive valuations. I'll gladly trade these forks for more Bitcoin"
We think our service does a positive thing for the crypto ecosystem, i.e. getting more users on the "ask" for these mostly worthless forks, hastening their eventual return to proper valuations (close to 0).
It wouldn't be a terrible thing for this market to end and we can all get back to building useful things on top of Bitcoin.
You could say that Clashic was that. But now with Bitcoin Core (BTCC) it's more of a mixed thing, some people are for the luls and some including some devs want to try scaling and privacy on-chain without all the frauds and lunatics of BCH and those are the same feelings of a lot of members on TG and Discord. (Plus who could say no to Ver's free promotion on CNBC etc. )
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Core [BTCC] - the True Vision like you've seen it on CNBC
We have sync'd a node. Trying to figure out how useful our tool will be for it, because it's a Clashic fork you would have needed to hold bitcoin during the 8/1/17 snapshot, assuming you didn't claim Clashic coins.
Yeap, it's kinda tricky. But if you add support, I'm sure it will be promoted through social media.
Post
Topic
BoardMining (Altcoins)
SPLNS vs PPLNS on 1-block DA
by
BitcoinCoreBTCC
on 19/06/2018, 10:02:00 UTC
For a coin that changes difficulty on every block and some times gets ninja-mining (turbo mine on low-diff, then quit when the difficulty goes up) Wouldn't a SPLNS be more fair than PPLNS? Any downsides, thoughts? Thanks
Post
Topic
BoardService Discussion
Re: Site for monitoring SegWit adoption?
by
BitcoinCoreBTCC
on 19/06/2018, 07:22:22 UTC
A new alternative to segwit.party popped up called https://segwit.space/ (I think it's from the Samurai wallet ppl)
Post
Topic
BoardService Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [SERVICE] 🔧 Coin Creation & Services 🔨 Bot & Web Development 🔥
by
BitcoinCoreBTCC
on 18/06/2018, 19:34:55 UTC
Looking for getting another explorer for BTCC with addresses balances. BTCC is a fork of Bitcoin Clashic -> fork of BCash -> fork of Bitcoin Would you be interested in setting up and keeping online one? Price? Time of delivery? Thanks
Post
Topic
BoardService Discussion
Exchange listing service
by
BitcoinCoreBTCC
on 18/06/2018, 19:31:26 UTC
Are there people that help on getting a coin listed in exchanges? (Talking about fork-coin, not ERC20/ICO tokens)
We had a good sprout of mining pools so the bounty got upgrade to require a distributed cross-region (EU+US) pool. - Setup+run a cross-region(US+EU) solid dedicated mining pool for BTCC: 100 BTCC (payout after a month of solid uptime and activity) (some pool software excluded, contact for details) - Setup+run block-explorer (with balances of addresses): from 50 to 100 BTCC (payout after a month of solid uptime)
and also increased the bounty for a block-explorer with addresses of balances.
Have fun and ask any questions
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Core [BTCC] - the True Vision like you've seen it on CNBC
Why don't you make this simple to understand that who had BCL at that specific block number will receive the coins. For example I had Bitcoins and also got BCH but BTC remained same while I dumped BCH when I saw good price. This thing cut off my way to get BTCC for good. That means most of the people will have to buy simply.
It is the only way to qualify for forked coins, but I am skeptical whether many people will really buy BTC to get this fork. It's not getting people as excited as it did when the first forks came out.
The hardfork happened 4 weeks ago so people won't buy BTC for this specific reason. BTCC however has a mission of going back to the core values with focus on on-chain scaling and privacy. Since the launch the devs have been working on R&D the different options and soon will publish them for peer-review.
video of linux wallet. super simple, it took 1 week for blockchain to download. but other than that its 4 steps and you are 100% good on linux 16.04LTS
I agree with the views on the development of the project with the comments above. And now the coin as well as many on the market is in a very attractive area for shopping.
Thank you.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Core [BTCC] - the True Vision like you've seen it on CNBC
If I understood it well what is explained on opening page that owing directly Bitcoin doesn't make you qualify for the forked coins, am I right ? I have seen good publicity on CNBC as mentioned in the title and also some well known people who were behind previous forks also promoted and marketed BTCC over the past few months. I will be following this one.
It depends at what time you owned Bitcoin.
- If you had BTC on block #478558, then you got BCH after that hardfork. - If you had BCH on block #504031 then you got BCL (Clashic) after that hardfork. - If you had BCL on block #576697, then you got BTCC (Bitcoin Core).
Cheers
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Core [BTCC] - the True Vision like you've seen it on CNBC
Since it was Bitcoin, then BCH/BCL and now BTCC, the blockchain was always publicly mined by a multitude of people. - If you had BTC on block #478558 and haven't spent them before later forks, your coins are present on BTCC. - If you had BCH on block #504031 and haven't spent them before later forks, your coins are present on BTCC. - If you had BCL/BCHC on block #576697, your coins are present on BTCC. No changes were done on the coin supply or distribution. BTCC had and follows the normal mining of a blockchain, no airdrops etc.
What does it mean "haven't spent them before later forks"? As long as one has the private key at those specific blocks, it shouldn't matter if the coins were spent later, unless the private key became compromised?
True, it's kinda difficult to explain all the cases for the previous forks, but tl;dr if you had BCL on block #576697, you have post-fork BTCC too.
The tricky thing is for example if you had BTC on #478558 but then spent the post-fork BCH before block #504031, then you wouldn't have BCL or BTCC.