Guys let's start a listing of the card stats.

Here is what I know:

OpenBazaar - (13 Health) (3 Attack) (3 Earth)
Askian BitTalks - (13 Health) (2 Attack) (5 Earth)
Aji-Basilaar - (11 Health) (4 Attack) (2 Fire)
Bearwhale - (17 Health) (3 Attack) (1 Earth)
Shapeshift, The Wanderer - (9 Health) (4 Attack) (6 Water)
Aji-Jaspaar - (15 Health) (3 Attack) (3 Water)
Clef, Warden of Wonders - (15 Health) (3 Attack) (3 Fire)
Storj Library - (12 Health) (4 Attack) (2 Earth)
Aji-Yeremaar - (10 Health) (4 Attack) (3 Earth)
The Stealing of Mt. Gox - (10 Health) (1 Attack) (10 Fire)
Aji-Arketaar - (10 Health) (2 Attack) (4 Earth)
Auction House of Zaif - (16 Health) (2 Attack) (3 Water)
The Genesis Block - (22 Health) (1 Attack) (1 Water)

Built an all Aji-Jaspaar deck...  Bad ass...  high health, and constant healing drops....

.

4) That would certainly be beneficial.  I think with a collective effort from all of us, Nexus most certainly will end up on other exchanges.  Can you expand on what you mean by wallet services?

So then let me ask you then, what would you personally be able to contribute to this Project IF it were open-sourced? You continually imply that this is all we need, so instead of continual criticism (lately) tell us how and why.  And please don't say we will get more investors because we are on Poloniex.  Ethereum and Bitshares were the top coins over there and now look at where the price went.  Also, I acknowledge that you have held this position for quite some time. 

Can't help but feel you're more interested in something to stimulate price so you can dump coins for profit. Viz has engaged respectfully with you in discussions about your concerns yet you continue to make negative remarks towards him. From my point of view distribution is a more pressing concern than additional exchanges, what is really needed and has been talked about much previously is a gpu pool. The source code has been made available privately for bittrex to review I see no reason why this would not also be the case for cryptsy and polo if they were interested. If Viz wants some time to patent the LLL which he has spent much time developing then I have no issue waiting for that, I would prefer however to see some development on software front for example, there are a few small bugs in the latest release of the miners, there is no staking android wallet and a gpu pool would help with distribution.

Well nothing in crypto is a sure thing.  I agree that we eventually want to be on Poloniex and maybe Cryptsy but it needs to be at the right time.

I believe that KryptoKash reached out to at least Poloniex in the past and they might have wanted to wait until the code was open sourced.  He also may have reached out to Cryptsy.  I agree different folks frequent different exchanges; however, that is not always a home run.  It may not necessarily increase value or interest.  But additional exchanges could increase visibility. Liquidity is also important so getting on too many exchanges may not be beneficial.  We recently discussed maybe trying to get on some smaller exchanges such as Cryptopia for now.

Why would that be good? Have you ever seen that work out for the better? Especially in the long run?

Ok, instead of real and doable logo contest feel free to to list NIRO on:
simplefx
gemini
btc-e
okcoin
and maybe poloniex

That should be enough for start.
PM me when you do this and I will send you more exchanges.

I'm sorta in the same boat. Nexus is bucking the trends by doing it's own thing. Last thing it needs is for greedy day traders to get their mits on the coin..

Although the arbitrage will help stabilise the price.. Not that the price isn't already stable.

Its such early days that I really honestly think theres no need to waste time or effort on getting Nexus Niro listed on other exchanges.

Once the coin goes open source, then let the floodgates open. Hit up every single exchange from btc-e to your local exchanges which list btc/ltc only. (Looking at you https://btcmarkets.net/)

looks good, how about new logo contest?

Agreed.  ++

The top two coins (with images) by Total Votes are added every Saturday morning around 10am.
Time Now: Tuesday 05:54:37
Please VOTE ,
http://cryptofolio.info/welcome/vote/

BitcoinSandiego,

I see what you are saying as to integrating more of these concepts into another tier of the network, this is what trust keys are beginning, which will be held to their own rules. Essentially my problem with master nodes is that they are established by a holding of the asset, which is beneficial to those that can afford, but I like using the concept of time is more valuable in trust than monetary influence, which is why I'm building the next tier with trust keys. I am planning on giving special trust based rules to miners as well to award the miners that work on the blockchain more consistently than others.

...My contemplation lies in finding a way to allow the source to be open to bring benefits you just mentioned, but at the same time prevent commercialization of the technology beyond Nexus in order to benefit the Nexus community as a whole.[/size]

2. Can you clarify what parts of the protocol will be open-sourced and what will be closed-sourced?  You say you will be licensing the LLL.  How is it possible to open-source Nexus Core and decentralize it while maintaining control over essential parts of the protocol? - The LLL is a template library I should begin by clarifying, so components patented under Nexus Core such as generate protocols or databases from the templates will be licensed according to their uses. This means that anything encapsulated in Nexus Core will be owned by the community of Nexus, or Niro holders. I want the technology developed for our space to remain first and foremost beneficial to Nexus, and secondary beneficial to the Internet. The LLL will include many inherited templates such as a SQL plugin for LLD and LLP, so forth that will be licensed to other areas of the internet to bring value back into Nexus.

3. Here's the main problem that I see right now: It looks like part of Nexus will be centralized and closed-source, and that in turn makes the protocol dependent upon one single person, you, in order to be built on by outside developers. - I agree with you, and recall this has been one of your initial concerns with the fact being that I am the sole developer. Keep in mind this is a temporary situation, more developers can flow into the project if any decide to dedicate their time, which currently would be in their investment. If they were to require a contract, this will require more funding to be generated to cover these extra costs, which would require more time from me to produce these funds through my contracting business. I am an advocate of decentralization and trust less systems, the problem in this current circumstance is that the industry as it stands is not a trust less system. It is a woven fabric of private groups that have more influence over the industry than general users, which means that we have to find those we can trust in order to be sure we are making safe investments. If you have any ideas on how to bridge this deficiency or by possibility have any other insights I am missing, please do share.

4. Can you also provide us with a theoretical use case for the LLL in which someone would want to pay to use it? - MySQL databases are limited even with sophisticated caching to about 2-3k requests per second. A website could simply utilize the LLD and LLP with a SQL template to increase their computational capabilities while requiring less hardware. This would streamline into their system if all SQL commands are honored in this template, which would lower overhead of the business and make the licensing of using such a system more profitable to the business then using conventional MySQL systems. This would also stand true with new services built with the LLL from the ground up. This can be seen similar to licensing costs for cPanel and other internet based technologies that bring more profit than their costs.

BitcoinSanDiego,

From reading your comments a few pages back, I find it necessary to clarify many errors in your thought patterns. You might want to re-read the thread from the beginning, you'll come to realize a good amount of the features I developed were suggested by the community and I chose to implement them. You must realize how a business works as well, in that, it must have a business plan and profit model. If you choose to understand things deeper, you will come to see that the patents [Primarily to my Lower Level Library] will only be leased at cost for commercial purposes, or in other words, if another entity wishes to monetize on the technology that was built for Nexus and its community, they will have to pay to the company in Niro, which in turn will benefit the entire Nexus community by stimulating the market. The patents will not remove one's ability to view and modify the technology, and to spread new innovation within the Nexus community, they will prevent other communities from taking that which was built by and for the people that brought Nexus to life, and using it to create their own commercial entities that will be in direct competition with this community and its investors.

Now you all got FCT on the exchange? To do what? Sell?

Import successful.