Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 115 results by BitconAssociation
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 18:47:56 UTC
USA can dominate the Bitcoin Beanie Babies scene tomorrow... They just have to shift a small percentage of their war funding to Bitcoin mining Beanie Babies production and focus Silicon valley

development on ASIC chip Beanie Babies manufacturing and they can dominate the scene. You chose your own battles...  Wink

FTFY. US government is not going to subsidize electricity to make a few guys rich when they turn it back into heat Smiley

They don't need to subsidize anything. Just sell superior hardware. Those that have access to cheap electricity will figure out the rest.

So this superior hardware will go to China? How will this affect centralization??
If shovels are made in New York, would you pan for gold in Manhattan?

We don't have to theorize on what would happen. GPU mining, for example, never became centralized in China despite the lower electric costs there.

Of course we have to theorize, otherwise this is a pointless conversation.
GPU mining was never centralized in China because Bitcoin's market cap was laughably small, because the power consumed was a fraction of the rig's cost, because people mining were weirdo hobbyists like me, who ran FurMark as an alternative, and because buying BTC directly was always more profitable.
Please.

1. GPU mining for bitcoins is alive and well. But it has to be done indirectly, through altcoins. GPU =>altcoin=>bitcoin, voila!

So if I flip burgers and buy BTC, I'm indirectly mining BTC? (Minimum wage paycheck) => (BTC), voila?
Some twisted thinking, but K.

Quote
2. GPU miners are different than ASIC miners in that you can resell the hardware (PCs, CPUs, RAMs + the GPUs themselves) after a few years and get something back or even repurpose the systems for something else. It has even less CAPEX if you start with used hardware. Obviously, buying older GPU hardware is not the same in terms of speed and power efficiency but people with subsidized power wouldn't care that much, would they? (Kind of like saying that no matter how slow the mining hardware is, it can still be profitable with extremely cheap or free electricity)

Mining BTC with GPUs is only feasible if by "subsidized power" you mean stolen, as in stolen from Mom or your national grid.

Quote
Still, it ain't happening (China centralization of GPUs).

What the west lacks, is access to cheap and fast ASIC equipment. There are people who can run mining hardware for free (flat electricity bill)

Flat electricity bill doesn't mean you can run an aluminum smelter in your apartment, or run bitcoin mining gear, or run an extension cord to your next door neighbor, who *doesn't* have a flat electricity bill.

You are simply looking for sneaky ways to swindle your landlord, and, in the process, fuck ordinary folks who don't steal electricity, because their rents go up because of *you*.  You're actually *worse* than Chinese miners stealing subsidized power, because you are *literally costing your neighbors money.*
No wonder people shy away from bitcoiners Sad

TL;DR: There is no such thing as free electricity. Unless by "free," you mean "steal without getting caught."
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 13:45:56 UTC
^^Are you currently smoking meth, or using auto-translate and can't be arsed with formatting?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 13:41:06 UTC
Why would they do anything detrimental to Bitcoin? It would hurt them more than anyone financially.

The miners won''t want to do anything bad. But the Chinese govt is getting seriously weird ...

The miners won't want to do anything *unprofitable for the miners*, "bad" is neither here nor there.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 13:38:07 UTC
So good, that Bitcoin has this pretty smart mechanism called difficulty, which will correct any changes of mining power within 2 weeks.

What's your point? Of course the difficulty will eventually go down if people stop mining. Duh.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 13:34:38 UTC
China can have most of the bitcoins and most of the transaction but i don't think they will destroy bitcoin, what will they do after destroying bitcoin?

Count the IRL actual money you gave them, fart through silk, and laugh?
You do understand that when teh halvening commeth, mining will become unprofitable for most miners until roughly half of them go out of business, correct

There are some other factors that will affect the number of bitcoin minner being alive, if the price of bitcoin doubles then the miners will still get profit, there will be produced higher quality of miners and the mining will not be stopped by an halving.

Right. And if the price halves? Or do you think the price will double just because miners want it to double?

If the price halves then this is another thing, there will be a sell panic time, i think the price will be increases and maybe doubled but not immediately after the halving, check the last halving and you will see that the price was pumped to 1k after 6months or more after the halving

So you're telling me that since BTC price went up some time after the halvening, it went up *because* of the halvening? Just like Obama scratched his ear, and a few weeks after that thhere was an earthquake on the other side of the globe, therefore if he scratches his ear again, expect earthquakes?

And why didn't this halvening thing work for LTC? Observe:

http://s32.postimg.org/57ixtqzyd/Capture.png

Yeah, that vertical line is the halvening Sad
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 13:21:01 UTC
China can have most of the bitcoins and most of the transaction but i don't think they will destroy bitcoin, what will they do after destroying bitcoin?

Count the IRL actual money you gave them, fart through silk, and laugh?
You do understand that when teh halvening commeth, mining will become unprofitable for most miners until roughly half of them go out of business, correct

There are some other factors that will affect the number of bitcoin minner being alive, if the price of bitcoin doubles then the miners will still get profit, there will be produced higher quality of miners and the mining will not be stopped by an halving.

Right. And if the price halves? Or do you think the price will double just because miners want it to double?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 13:13:05 UTC
They are making a lot of money of this. And why does it matter anyway?
It is not like China itself owns all the miners. Most of the miners are owned by investors and they dont want to see their money fountain get shot.

Again, you don't understand how mining works. Here:
1. You buy a "money fountain"
2. You work your "money fountain" for a few months.
3. You shut down your "money fountain" or buy a new one, because your old one is obsolete. Your old money fountain is a doorstop. If it didn't pay for itself in these few months, you're shit out of luck.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 13:06:16 UTC
So there masterplan is to invest millions of dollars into a mining farm, collaborate with other farms that have done the same, destroy bitcoin and lose everything?/ sounds like a solid business model...

You do understand that when miners "invest millions of dollars into a mining farm," that investment becomes worthless in less than half a year, because increasing hashrate & having to invest more millions of dollars on new gear? Or do you think those Butterfly Labs rigs you invested millions in are still worth millions?

@AlexGR: Mining is centralized in china due to government-subsidized electricity. Production is centralized for the same reason everything else is made there: dirt-cheap labor.
The invisible hand works in mysterious ways, in this case through Communist government trying to modernize its country.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 12:55:11 UTC
China can have most of the bitcoins and most of the transaction but i don't think they will destroy bitcoin, what will they do after destroying bitcoin?

Count the IRL actual money you gave them, fart through silk, and laugh?
You do understand that when teh halvening commeth, mining will become unprofitable for most miners until roughly half of them go out of business, correct?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin IS basically DESTROYED
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 12:50:05 UTC
Why would they do anything detrimental to Bitcoin? It would hurt them more than anyone financially.

The same argument applies to central banks: Why would they debase the very currency they issue, how does that even make sense Huh
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: IF the NSA wanted to take control over Bitcoin, how would they do it?
by
BitconAssociation
on 08/05/2016, 12:18:25 UTC
A huge lumbering bureaucracy?    How about-- take over the Bitcoin Foundation and then find themselves surprised when it doesn't control Bitcoin.


Ya, they so dum they tried to buy me out for one billion dollars. You no wat I tolded them? I sez 2 them no, keep your filthy fiat toilet paper!

Nobody ever seems to be fond of the idea that the NSA could of course very well have invented the Bitcoin project in the first place. Really why not?

Most arguments are about "why should they invent an open source project, that could interrupt the banking system?", which is understandable. Shouldn't they protect their system including national banks?

Bitcoin would threaten the banking system if:
1. More than a fraction of one percent of the population used it.
2. That fraction of one percent was otherwise productive members of society, not child-like criminals stealing from each other.
3. IRL adults considered Bitcoin to be more sound, as a store of value, than Beanie Babies (which are the REAL threat to the banking system, with NSA spending billions in taxpayer money to discredit Beanie Babies and suppress beanie trade).

Oddly enough, those parameters aren't met, so bitscoin is used as a honeypot, corralling the world's most inept criminals into an ecosystem where their shenanigans are monitored on the blogchain and this forum. On computer screens, by a couple of chubby agents who are otherwise useless, too weak and fat to actually be useful in the field, dealin with smart IRL criminals.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 291.2409 BTC for a 0.0001 BTC transaction .
by
BitconAssociation
on 07/05/2016, 17:46:02 UTC
To be honest, it's the guy's fault that did this huge mistake (how the fuck do you not realize you are sending that insane amount for a fee?) I mean unless he was drunk, I have no idea how I would ever do this.
Bitcoin is about self-responsibility, so if you can't eve properly send a fee, that's your fault and the miners aren't forced to give this guy's money back, even tho it would be nice.


Yeah but in this case (like many others) the pool/site wants to give it back to the real owner. He/they should only prove the ownership of the input address '1QgTYzMYqStzZBQx8gguYaJQMjFRbagbh'.

Lol no, the guy who started the "Bitclub is trying to return the coin" story was trolling.
Everyone instantly believed him because desperate for news that doesn't involve bitcoiners robbing each other.

Wrong. That's what the Coindesk article said. Now, Bitclub can go back on their word, but that will have significant negative repercussions on their business if they are recognized as untrustworthy.

Link to Bitclub official statement plz?

i think this will do the job:

From: mining@coindesk.com

Dear Sir,

we are currently waiting for someone to reach out to us and claim their mistake so that we can verify them and send their bitcoin back, but so far as of this posting nobody has been able to verify it.

Blockchain : https://blockchain.info/tx/cc455ae816e6cdafdb58d54e35d4f46d860047458eacf1c7405dc634631c570d

Answer form : http://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7spoqTudJfWX01xdE1FYlRkQnM

Best Regards.

What am I looking at, and why is your second link asking me to download an executable?

http://s32.postimg.org/d2kzfhyo5/Capture.png

Please provide a link to an official public statement made by Bitclub. ty.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 291.2409 BTC for a 0.0001 BTC transaction .
by
BitconAssociation
on 07/05/2016, 15:59:12 UTC
To be honest, it's the guy's fault that did this huge mistake (how the fuck do you not realize you are sending that insane amount for a fee?) I mean unless he was drunk, I have no idea how I would ever do this.
Bitcoin is about self-responsibility, so if you can't eve properly send a fee, that's your fault and the miners aren't forced to give this guy's money back, even tho it would be nice.


Yeah but in this case (like many others) the pool/site wants to give it back to the real owner. He/they should only prove the ownership of the input address '1QgTYzMYqStzZBQx8gguYaJQMjFRbagbh'.

Lol no, the guy who started the "Bitclub is trying to return the coin" story was trolling.
Everyone instantly believed him because desperate for news that doesn't involve bitcoiners robbing each other.

Wrong. That's what the Coindesk article said. Now, Bitclub can go back on their word, but that will have significant negative repercussions on their business if they are recognized as untrustworthy.

Link to Bitclub official statement plz?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 291.2409 BTC for a 0.0001 BTC transaction .
by
BitconAssociation
on 07/05/2016, 15:00:56 UTC
To be honest, it's the guy's fault that did this huge mistake (how the fuck do you not realize you are sending that insane amount for a fee?) I mean unless he was drunk, I have no idea how I would ever do this.
Bitcoin is about self-responsibility, so if you can't eve properly send a fee, that's your fault and the miners aren't forced to give this guy's money back, even tho it would be nice.


Yeah but in this case (like many others) the pool/site wants to give it back to the real owner. He/they should only prove the ownership of the input address '1QgTYzMYqStzZBQx8gguYaJQMjFRbagbh'.

Lol no, the guy who started the "Bitclub is trying to return the coin" story was trolling.
Everyone instantly believed him because desperate for news that doesn't involve bitcoiners robbing each other.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Why Banks Hates Bitcoin?
by
BitconAssociation
on 07/05/2016, 14:48:34 UTC
Governments couldn't properly control, tax and carry insane commissions on banking movements if everyone used Bitcoin, that's basically it. Government losses control over people's money and that's why they don't like it, and we all know governments are in constant debt with banks, so just connect the dots.
And totally not because Bitcoin accounts for over 40% Shocked of criminal-to-criminal online payments
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
by
BitconAssociation
on 03/05/2016, 16:47:20 UTC
Well, the litecointalk forums got hacked. So ... that did a lot of damage to the coins value. It should not have. I didn't even notice until yesterday.
Last months pump had to end in one way or another. Was there any delicate information or coins stolen?

Wasn't that forum mostly ded? maybe 10 posts/day total, if that?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Halving Bitcoin Reward Unlikely to Cause Price Surge
by
BitconAssociation
on 03/05/2016, 16:39:56 UTC
...
I'm not trying to argue that we *will* see a spike in price, rather, that the effect of a block reward halving is one of many factors that could contribute to higher prices. It's possible that expectations have overbid prices now and that, as a result, they'll actually fall. But, over the long term, prices should average higher with a reward of 25 than they would have with a block reward of 50.

Since we're clearly not getting anywhere, how about some data to ponder? Here's Litecoin halvening, I think Aug. 26 is when it happened.

http://s32.postimg.org/xtvi2yzs5/Capture.png

Would you be able to point to Teh Halvening on the chart if not for the helpful vertical line?
Why did the price not go up, as the halvening faithful predicted?

Let's give analogies one more chance, let's imagine again.
The Princess (from our last game) issued a decree: "On Jan. 1, 2017, Princess Satolestia will buy all your Bit coins @ $10k/BTC."

Taking into account that you are the cunning and rational trader I know you to be, wat do?
Do you wait until Jan. 1, or do you start buying now?
If you chose to wait until Jan 1, why? If not, why?


While we have to imagine that Princess never lies, we can be 100% sure that Teh Halvening will happen, because algorithmically determined and maths. It's been announced back in 2009, and will surprise no one who cares Smiley

Bawww!

^Sorry ur platinum mad, bro, didn't mean to pop ur bubble.
Just go back 2 wat u waz doin' pl0x Smiley

http://opioids.com/images/opiumsmoker.jpg

@--Encrypted--: how many people actually use BTC "not just for trading"? How is LTC fundamentally different from BTC?
P.S. Feel free to play my game above, see boldface Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Halving Bitcoin Reward Unlikely to Cause Price Surge
by
BitconAssociation
on 03/05/2016, 16:26:17 UTC
...
I'm not trying to argue that we *will* see a spike in price, rather, that the effect of a block reward halving is one of many factors that could contribute to higher prices. It's possible that expectations have overbid prices now and that, as a result, they'll actually fall. But, over the long term, prices should average higher with a reward of 25 than they would have with a block reward of 50.

Since we're clearly not getting anywhere, how about some data to ponder? Here's Litecoin halvening, I think Aug. 26 is when it happened.

http://s32.postimg.org/xtvi2yzs5/Capture.png

Would you be able to point to Teh Halvening on the chart if not for the helpful vertical line?
Why did the price not go up, as the halvening faithful predicted?

Let's give analogies one more chance, let's imagine again.
The Princess (from our last game) issued a decree: "On Jan. 1, 2017, Princess Satolestia will buy all your Bit coins @ $10k/BTC."

Taking into account that you are the cunning and rational trader I know you to be, wat do?
Do you wait until Jan. 1, or do you start buying now?
If you chose to wait until Jan 1, why? If not, why?

While we have to imagine that Princess never lies, we can be 100% sure that Teh Halvening will happen, because algorithmically determined and maths. It's been announced back in 2009, and will surprise no one who cares Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Exchange volume distribution. BTC belongs to China
by
BitconAssociation
on 03/05/2016, 01:54:28 UTC
The Chinese volumes are rigged. Most of the exchanges offer near-Zero fees, and therefore the users tend to indulge in a lot of margin trading. If you exempt the margin trading volumes, < >
Perhaps "margin trading" is not the phrase you were looking for?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Halving Bitcoin Reward Unlikely to Cause Price Surge
by
BitconAssociation
on 03/05/2016, 01:21:43 UTC
^^You misunderstood me. The supply/demand chart simply doesn't apply when you're buying money with money. The more a dollar is worth, the more you want it.
Let's say there's an imaginary coin called Bitcoin. See fig. 1 below.

http://pre05.deviantart.net/cb2d/th/pre/i/2013/076/5/7/ten_bit_coin___royal_equestrian_mint_by_tidalkraken-d5ydcl1.jpg

                                                     Fig. 1

1. Let's further say that there's a queen, we'll call her Satolestia, who is totally trustworthy and buys and sells those coins for exactly 1 US dollar. She promises to buy all the coins we have to sell, forever, and we trust her, because she's a queen and also an imaginary one, the kind that doesn't lie.
If we're bored enough, we'd buy and sell those coins from/to Satolestia day in and day out.  Pretty pointless, but hey...

2. ...until Satolestia changes the terms: she starts charging a penny more, but still pays a dollar when we sell her a coin.
Wat do?
Obviously, the dumb thing to do would be to keep buying, and losing a penny a coin. But we're in it for PROFIT, so we stop buying altogether. Not just some of us, not slow down our buying, but both of us. Stop buying. Because buying shit for $1.01 and selling it for a penny less is an excellent way to go broke.
Which we don't wanna do.

3. Conversely, if Satolestia starts charging us 99 cents per coin, while still paying a dollar, we'd be on that shit like white on rice -- we'd go into a frenzy, buying a coin and selling it right back to Satolestia at a profit, rinse, repeat, until we're satiated.

You see where I'm going with this?
It doesn't matter to us how many dollars or how many Bit coins there are, the only thing we need is the price, and knowing what someone will pay for our coin. This is an imaginary thing, we know exactly what Satolestia will pay (because she told us & does not lie), so the problem is trivial: If Bitcoin price is < a dollar, buy; If => dollar, don't.

The fun part -- and what makes purely speculative assets fun, is that there is no Satolestia. We have to guess what people will be willing to pay. We might convince them that our Bit coins are worth more than a dollar because there's a limited number, but you and I know that's just a pitch, a nice backstory, a coldblooded thing to say to a motherfucker before you put a cap in his ass.

Other than "too many words," do you see what I'm saying?