Search content
Sort by
Showing 16 of 16 results by BleedCrypto
WTS 20,000 BILL.
Please PM offers. Happy to escrow.
Please PM offers. Happy to escrow.
lol... that was fast ...
So mining wise its about 6 hours now .
which means about 0.025 BTC worth of dash or 0.022 worth of start.
I can pay you about 0.03 BTC for 20,000 Bills
From the looks of it , you probably have an X11 asic .. that true?
I actually am going to pull my sale, I put it up a little prematurely.
First off, nice job and congratulations on finding and implementing the solution to SDC's anonymity problem.
Secondly, go fuck yourself. This is open source software. If SDC stole your anonymity solution, then you stole their entire codebase. Get over yourself.
And no, I don't hold any SDC and give zero shits if it dies.
Secondly, go fuck yourself. This is open source software. If SDC stole your anonymity solution, then you stole their entire codebase. Get over yourself.
And no, I don't hold any SDC and give zero shits if it dies.
why are you so sore?
Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now!
It looks like SDC went live with our solution for hashToEC.
https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png
They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014
What's this mean?
We are the leaders kids.
This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago:
This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago:
This is their commit after they read our critique of their method:
https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a
https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png
They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014
What's this mean?
We are the leaders kids.
This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago:
Code:
for (j = 0; j < k; ++j)
{
if (j == 0)
x = u;
else
{
secp256k1_fe_set_int(&i, j);
secp256k1_fe_add(&x, &i);
}
if (secp256k1_ge_set_xquad_var(&Q, &x))
{
success = 1;
break;
}
}
{
if (j == 0)
x = u;
else
{
secp256k1_fe_set_int(&i, j);
secp256k1_fe_add(&x, &i);
}
if (secp256k1_ge_set_xquad_var(&Q, &x))
{
success = 1;
break;
}
}
This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago:
Code:
while(!EC_POINT_set_compressed_coordinates_GFp(ecGrp, ptRet, bnTmp, 0, bnCtx) && count < 100)
{
count += 1;
if (count == 100)
return errorN(1, "%s: Failed to find a valid point for public key.", __func__);
BN_add(bnTmp, bnTmp, bnOne);
}
{
count += 1;
if (count == 100)
return errorN(1, "%s: Failed to find a valid point for public key.", __func__);
BN_add(bnTmp, bnTmp, bnOne);
}
This is their commit after they read our critique of their method:
https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a
why you hatin on shadowcash? isnt your coin just a shadowcash clone?
since when is stating a fact, "hatin"?
Eclipse will soon be the market leader and overtake SDC. Clearly superior developers with legit experience here as SDC decided they couldn't fix their own coin.
Taken from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14121951#msg14121951
Taken from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14121951#msg14121951
It looks like SDC went live with our solution for hashToEC.
https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png
They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014
What's this mean?
We are the leaders kids.
This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago:
This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago:
This is their commit after they read our critique of their method:
https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a
https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png
They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014
What's this mean?
We are the leaders kids.
This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago:
Code:
for (j = 0; j < k; ++j)
{
if (j == 0)
x = u;
else
{
secp256k1_fe_set_int(&i, j);
secp256k1_fe_add(&x, &i);
}
if (secp256k1_ge_set_xquad_var(&Q, &x))
{
success = 1;
break;
}
}
{
if (j == 0)
x = u;
else
{
secp256k1_fe_set_int(&i, j);
secp256k1_fe_add(&x, &i);
}
if (secp256k1_ge_set_xquad_var(&Q, &x))
{
success = 1;
break;
}
}
This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago:
Code:
while(!EC_POINT_set_compressed_coordinates_GFp(ecGrp, ptRet, bnTmp, 0, bnCtx) && count < 100)
{
count += 1;
if (count == 100)
return errorN(1, "%s: Failed to find a valid point for public key.", __func__);
BN_add(bnTmp, bnTmp, bnOne);
}
{
count += 1;
if (count == 100)
return errorN(1, "%s: Failed to find a valid point for public key.", __func__);
BN_add(bnTmp, bnTmp, bnOne);
}
This is their commit after they read our critique of their method:
https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a
Eclipse will soon be the market leader and overtake SDC. Clearly superior developers with legit experience here.
Taken from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14121951#msg14121951
Taken from: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14121951#msg14121951
It looks like SDC went live with our solution for hashToEC.
https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png
They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014
What's this mean?
We are the leaders kids.
This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago:
This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago:
This is their commit after they read our critique of their method:
https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a
https://i.imgur.com/S9Q3t7l.png
They switched from creating a new generator, discussed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.msg14079014#msg14079014
What's this mean?
We are the leaders kids.
This is the heart of our algo, pushed publicly 9 days ago:
Code:
for (j = 0; j < k; ++j)
{
if (j == 0)
x = u;
else
{
secp256k1_fe_set_int(&i, j);
secp256k1_fe_add(&x, &i);
}
if (secp256k1_ge_set_xquad_var(&Q, &x))
{
success = 1;
break;
}
}
{
if (j == 0)
x = u;
else
{
secp256k1_fe_set_int(&i, j);
secp256k1_fe_add(&x, &i);
}
if (secp256k1_ge_set_xquad_var(&Q, &x))
{
success = 1;
break;
}
}
This is shadowcash's pushed to their repo 3 days ago:
Code:
while(!EC_POINT_set_compressed_coordinates_GFp(ecGrp, ptRet, bnTmp, 0, bnCtx) && count < 100)
{
count += 1;
if (count == 100)
return errorN(1, "%s: Failed to find a valid point for public key.", __func__);
BN_add(bnTmp, bnTmp, bnOne);
}
{
count += 1;
if (count == 100)
return errorN(1, "%s: Failed to find a valid point for public key.", __func__);
BN_add(bnTmp, bnTmp, bnOne);
}
This is their commit after they read our critique of their method:
https://github.com/shadowproject/shadow/commit/106afc6975cf41090ca2a0c47877de0cc8a16f1a
Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now!
Could we get a block explorer that shows the current coin supply?
Yes. We are working on all this. We are still nailing down the following:
1. Finalize branding, logos, etc., pay the bounty
2. Add enough Website Content to satisfy exchanges
3. Block explorer (probably fairglu's) -- this much of the list will get us on yobit and/or bleutrade
4. We need to decide on where to host the Qt wallets so we can track downloads (not mediafire)
5. Finalize the medium-term development road map
6. Get the whitepaper finished (post bleutrade/yobit, pre bittrex)
It seems like a straightforward list, but we have multiple devs and we have to reach consensus about every little thing.
Once we finalize all decisions, we should proceed through the list pretty fast, although we will pace 4 & 5 to ensure we spend enough time at the smaller exchanges before we move to the larger.
sounds good but 3,4,5,6 are pretty much a parts of 2
We are going to go through the process in due time. First you get on small exchanges for price discovery and distribution. Then you go on big exchanges. There is no rush here. Miners can get out early at a smaller exchange with some good profit. And believers can hold for bigger exchanges or implementation of roadmap features.
We won't put the cart in front of the horse.
We are going to put some website content up within the day. For now, the community should start to try to help us get on yobit or bleutrade.
In the meantime, here is a block explorer with rich list: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ec/
nice. one step closer to exchanging.
Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ First Cryptographically Anon Based on BTC ▲ Mine Now!
can't download Windows QT from Mediafire 
Please change this sh*t storage on something better
mega.nz as example
Good luck, dev!
Please change this sh*t storage on something better
mega.nz as example
Good luck, dev!
Okay. We'll put it on something better. We are almost done building the mac wallet.
We still need to move from mediafire, but the Mac wallet is at http://www.mediafire.com/download/wa9i3b2pi8rprdh/Eclipse-Qt.dmg
We just finished building it. We'll move from mediafire soon.
awesome. ty for this!
Eclipse is the first TRULY cryptographically anon coin (bye bye SDC)
did Eclipse just kill off SDC?
sounds like it to me. bye bye SDC trolls, hello Eclipse!
taken from original thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.0
To hell with it, here comes the cat out of the bag.
Eclipse is the first truly cryptographically anonymous coin based on the bitcoin protocol.
It is forked from shadowcash, which was completely de-anoned. See here: https://shnoe.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/de-anonymizing-shadowcash-and-oz-coin/
You will see from Shen Noether's write-up that they used a cryptographically insecure hashToEC function.
Here, we replaced their hashToEC with a cryptographically secure variant. Right now shadowcash is still not anonymous. Eclipse is anonymous.
The writeup linked above describes how the shadowcash hashToEC is broken, so I won't go into it here.
We use what is known as "try-and-increment hashing to an elliptic curve". It is a simple algorithm that is used in several cryptosystems. Key image with our algo goes like this:
1. take a scalar hash (e.g. SHA256d) of the public key (k) and map it to x on the secp256k1 discrete field
2. determine whether this x is a quadratic residue of secp256k1
3. if x is not a quadratic residue, set x = x+1 and go to 2
4. else x is a quadratic residue so keep the point x, y, where y is the positive solution to x for secp256k1, let's call this point p
5. multiply the point p = (x,y) by the scalar representing the private key x, such that key image I = xp
You can verify this is our algo by looking at secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes() in our source tree at src/secp256k1/secp256k1/src/secp256k1.c. Rather than re-invent the wheel, we used bitcoin's secp256k1 library to determine the suitability of x and to find it's root to map point x,y.
Happy mining!
Edit:
I forgot to add that anyone who investigates may come across a caveat about try-and-increment where it is subject to "timing attack". Timing attack is absolutely not relevant to ring signatures though, because everyone already knows what a timing attack might reveal: the curve, the input k, and the scalar hash algorithm used. Going back to the original cryptonote white paper, the private key x is protected by discrete logarithm hardness.
Edit:
We have a whitepaper coming that goes into more detail and summarizes Shen's work.
sounds like it to me. bye bye SDC trolls, hello Eclipse!
taken from original thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1378922.0
To hell with it, here comes the cat out of the bag.
Eclipse is the first truly cryptographically anonymous coin based on the bitcoin protocol.
It is forked from shadowcash, which was completely de-anoned. See here: https://shnoe.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/de-anonymizing-shadowcash-and-oz-coin/
You will see from Shen Noether's write-up that they used a cryptographically insecure hashToEC function.
Here, we replaced their hashToEC with a cryptographically secure variant. Right now shadowcash is still not anonymous. Eclipse is anonymous.
The writeup linked above describes how the shadowcash hashToEC is broken, so I won't go into it here.
We use what is known as "try-and-increment hashing to an elliptic curve". It is a simple algorithm that is used in several cryptosystems. Key image with our algo goes like this:
1. take a scalar hash (e.g. SHA256d) of the public key (k) and map it to x on the secp256k1 discrete field
2. determine whether this x is a quadratic residue of secp256k1
3. if x is not a quadratic residue, set x = x+1 and go to 2
4. else x is a quadratic residue so keep the point x, y, where y is the positive solution to x for secp256k1, let's call this point p
5. multiply the point p = (x,y) by the scalar representing the private key x, such that key image I = xp
You can verify this is our algo by looking at secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes() in our source tree at src/secp256k1/secp256k1/src/secp256k1.c. Rather than re-invent the wheel, we used bitcoin's secp256k1 library to determine the suitability of x and to find it's root to map point x,y.
Happy mining!
Edit:
I forgot to add that anyone who investigates may come across a caveat about try-and-increment where it is subject to "timing attack". Timing attack is absolutely not relevant to ring signatures though, because everyone already knows what a timing attack might reveal: the curve, the input k, and the scalar hash algorithm used. Going back to the original cryptonote white paper, the private key x is protected by discrete logarithm hardness.
Edit:
We have a whitepaper coming that goes into more detail and summarizes Shen's work.
Re: [ANN] [EC] ▲ Eclipse ▲ SHA256d PoW/PoS V2 ▲ HiPoS Reward ▲ Mine Now!
Even when trying to solo mine I get coinbase error mismatch, DOA.... ocminer was right.
youre right move along
nothing to see here.
Re: --TRUMP COIN—RELEASED **LOW DIFF**LETS MAKE CRYPTO GREAT AGAIN****
Is this the official trump coin issued by Donald Trump or just some clowns trying to make a quick buck?
neither. nobody going to care about straight pow coin with 6 people mining.
posting in the thread with ridiculous shill accounts does not count as "good pr and marketing".
i dont see it happenin.
Re: --TRUMP COIN—RELEASED **LOW DIFF**LETS MAKE CRYPTO GREAT AGAIN****
Is this the official trump coin issued by Donald Trump or just some clowns trying to make a quick buck?
neither. nobody going to care about straight pow coin with 6 people mining.