Search content
Sort by
Showing 14 of 14 results by BlockTrade
RE-BRAND***RE-BRAND***RE-BRAND
GDAX GDAX GDAX
"Dear customer,
we appreciate your interest in the matter and understand your motivation and disappointment.
However please understand that our decision to delist GEMZ stands for now. All relevant considerations have been pondered and the discussion about it has been concluded.
We will let you know should it be considered for re listing in the future.
Thank you for your understanding and all the best.
Sincerely,
Poloniex"
GDAX GDAX GDAX
"Dear customer,
we appreciate your interest in the matter and understand your motivation and disappointment.
However please understand that our decision to delist GEMZ stands for now. All relevant considerations have been pondered and the discussion about it has been concluded.
We will let you know should it be considered for re listing in the future.
Thank you for your understanding and all the best.
Sincerely,
Poloniex"
With the de-listing on Poloniex, that is the real insult. I looked yesterday before the de-listing there were over 60 currencies with lower trading volume and most all had no comparable development. This calls for an immediate re-branding and move to be listed on GDAX. Paykey must be merged with getgems.
If you look at the technology behind the GetGems keyboard and how that is used to create PayKey you would wonder, why isn't this taking off? The answer is, it is taking off. If you do a little research you will see there is huge interest in this technology from large entities mentioned above, and many others including global financial companies. This fintech project has much more substance than the majority of others that poloniex and other platforms pump because of transaction-fee revenue. There are better platforms up and coming that will list GetGems. Keep in mind, GetGems could easily be re-branded to mix with PayKey. Once that happens all the haters will wish they bought and held.
Buy and hold.
Buy and hold.
You miss the point and also the crime that Daniel committed. He took money from investors here and clearly used it to run around and promote another project that has no profit connection to those investors. Sorry but that is terrible in anyone's book. In my mind he actually stole the investors money.....what else do you call it when you invest in something and the person doesn't put that money into we all invested in but something else....try dong that for say a construction job and see how quickly people try to sue you. Getgems app wasn't bricks and mortar but it was a virtual product we thought we were investing in.
If what you say is true, then it would make sense to merge the two companies, getgems and paykey, creating one powerful company. This would keep everyone happy. those in the beginning, plus new investors.
If you look at the technology behind the GetGems keyboard and how that is used to create PayKey you would wonder, why isn't this taking off? The answer is, it is taking off. If you do a little research you will see there is huge interest in this technology from large entities mentioned above, and many others including global financial companies. This fintech project has much more substance than the majority of others that poloniex and other platforms pump because of transaction-fee revenue. There are better platforms up and coming that will list GetGems. Keep in mind, GetGems could easily be re-branded to mix with PayKey. Once that happens all the haters will wish they bought and held.
Buy and hold.
Buy and hold.
Re: [ANN] IPO of MaidSafe: Entering the Future of the Decentralized Internet
Wendys (Data) Breach Reportedly Hitting Some CUs Hard
http://cutoday.ssd.thinkcreativeinternal.net/Fresh-Today/Wendy-s-Breach-Reportedly-Hitting-Some-CUs-Hard?utm_source=Fresh+Today+030316&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Fresh+Today+030316
http://cutoday.ssd.thinkcreativeinternal.net/Fresh-Today/Wendy-s-Breach-Reportedly-Hitting-Some-CUs-Hard?utm_source=Fresh+Today+030316&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Fresh+Today+030316
Re: [ANN] Radium SmartChain Phase 2.3 100% Decentralized Username-Address Linkage
BTW, the system updated, before even though I had 101 coins it thought I only had 2, now that it sees I have 101, only 5 days til stake reward. Booyah!
I accept donations if Dev likes my enthusiasm
Xmiafgtbxo67jjPgdvXzEpRHKZgZ5pXfDY
I accept donations if Dev likes my enthusiasm
Xmiafgtbxo67jjPgdvXzEpRHKZgZ5pXfDY
Re: [ANN] Radium SmartChain Phase 2.3 100% Decentralized Username-Address Linkage
I also cant figure out the value of smartchain, considering when I decay radium into radon I lose radium unless I gain it back in stake which as of now takes 200 days with 100 radium...
Re: [ANN] Radium SmartChain Phase 2.3 100% Decentralized Username-Address Linkage
Hi!
Welcome to the Radium Project. The estimate of time it takes to stake provided by the wallet is an estimate, and is not always correct. The time it takes to stake depends on how many coins you have, and how many coins other people have staking. The current network stake weight is 1,000,454. This means that your chance of staking a block each day is about (150/1,000,454) * 1440, or around 20%. That is about 1 block every five days. If you wanted to stake faster, you would need to get some more Radium (RADS). This is how most all Proof-Of-Stake coins work, and it is not unique to Radium.
I hope that helps!
JJ
Welcome to the Radium Project. The estimate of time it takes to stake provided by the wallet is an estimate, and is not always correct. The time it takes to stake depends on how many coins you have, and how many coins other people have staking. The current network stake weight is 1,000,454. This means that your chance of staking a block each day is about (150/1,000,454) * 1440, or around 20%. That is about 1 block every five days. If you wanted to stake faster, you would need to get some more Radium (RADS). This is how most all Proof-Of-Stake coins work, and it is not unique to Radium.
I hope that helps!
JJ
I have 101 radium in my wallet; it says my time to earn a reward is 170 days. How can I earn a reward faster?