Oddly enough Brainwallet TX seems to be failing whereas electrum didn't find any issues with verification

Actually mprep's sticky banning low effort task deals with that however I don't think that is actually enforced since it would mean 99% of the tasks would be removed since they all encourage similar low effort shitposting

This has to be the most hilarious account sale I have seen in a while, so you're expecting someone to pay 0.03 + increments for a newbie account all because you shitposted 360+ times on it? Doesn't help that with merit system at it's best the account is a potential "Jr Member".

Don't buy accounts kids, make your own. Work your own way up

Are you by any chance using Tor? Since that's one major issue with Cloudflare if I'm not wrong, if you take too long to type a post (which happens a lot with my longer posts) then the Cloudflare would cause some issues and my entire message would get deleted

I figure he's not going to loan a complete newbie even a couple of cents given you have no obligation to return the loan at all

He's just referring to the post #5 you posted which is his thread offering to be an internet lawyer to defend people against "abuse from DT members". Well he's pointing out that his service is now free and your post should be edited to reflect that while at the same time pushing his own agenda. I'd say you can safely ignore him

My bad, I had several tabs open and glanced at the wrong accounts, yeah those seem to be farmed accounts specifically leveled to reach member which pretty much opens up signature campaigns now that Jr Members are no longer eligible to participate

So according to you, self promotion isn't as equally bad? I would much much rather have mining free of those couple of odd threads than bothering reporting those repetitive comments in those mega threads. Since atleast they are concentrated in one single board as opposed to what suchmoon pointed out.

Speaking of your other point, I don't really remember or care to check but you telling other's not to question staff (which isn't a rule anywhere and in most cases is allowed as long as you have sufficient proof to back yourself) is pretty damn ironic.

Throwback to the time you questioned the DT system Theymos, very senior admin made and the many many times you made similar hypocritical statements.

Do us all a favour, just keep your promise

I figure he's leveraging the reputation of his account. I figure that he wouldn't specifically be scamming ten dollars given the account would sell for way more to a scammer anyway.

That being said he's looking to lose atleast $3 on the fees on each side not to mention the conversion rates for PayPal.

I just noticed the campaign was extended and as we discussed you were willing to make and opening. If your offer is still open then I would like to apply for the campaign.

Bitcointalk Username: Blue Tyrant
Rank: Copper Member (wearing the member signature)
Current Post Count: 163 (as of the current post)
BTC Address: 3Fk7K5Qg1RDZXAMjaT7MnqbHiVbbWyqcBP
ETH Address: Will add in just a bit
Wearing Avatar and Personal Message: Yes

Cheers!

For starters depending on the specifics of the case this probably should go to either Meta or reputation since no one was scammed in conventional terms


No, that's just the merit system working as intended. They were members before the merit system was introduced and probably are stuck there.


Report their posts for plagiarism and also link the original source of the comments so the mods can ban their accounts for copy pasting which by the way is a permabannable offense

I suppose this thread's one of the best examples of Poe's Law at play (which I like to quote a lot given how relevant it is these days)

---

But damn I think Digiran lost more than a few screws while I was gone. Last I remember he was accusing BTCforJoe for his signatureless campaign and the next thing I know is he's deep in the rabbithole of trolling, red paints and wild delusions.

I'd debate that claim that it is fully relevant. Since I enjoy analogies the Bitcoin equivalent of that would be similar to someone making a bitcoin mining guide and starting that off with a link to "Buy my Antminer ".

The intention of the mining guide should be to teach people to mine and not to sell your product. But again as I mentioned the line between shilling and not shilling is kinda thing and difficult to effectively segregate here and going purely on the rules that are "written" I can see why it's allowed

Based on what the OP has posted IMO this belongs to the securities section rather than the lending section as this seems to be more of a long term investment rather than a short term "payday" kind of loan which is prevalent here

As a borderline nerd I would like to play the devil's advocate here and point out that micro(μ) scientifically according to the Système international d'unités's metric prefixes standards for 10⁻⁶ of a given unit. Since this is Bitcointalk we can assume that the default "metric" unit can be assumed to be a BTC and thus a μBTC loan would be for loans in and around the range of 0.000001BTC. Thus the lender's service is actually beyond a micro loan and nearly touches the territory of a milli loan service

---

Obligatory sarcasm note for those who fell for Poe's Law

If we had to be extremely pedantic then I'd say masternodes are technically a way to mine an altcoin except they seem to also be shilling their token and trying to sell their master node tokens which should belong to the Shilling Spamfest Section Altcoin Bounties or if they're auctioning the nodes then Auctions (or whatever the actual case).

---

Uhhh I just had a look at the thread, literally the first comment reads like a shill comment


https://archive.fo/VQU1c

As I interpreted the question, you seem to be asking if you want to make your own coin then would you require to use some part of the code Bitcoin uses? The answer would be that it depends on a lot of factors and isn't as simple.

• Is your coin a fork of bitcoin? If the answer is yes then you might be developing a coin that you could call a "fork" which would heavily rely on the existing code but most future development might depend on the choice of the community and the developers of said forked coin
• Are you just developing a smart contract based coin? If yes then you're more or less leveraging the existing blockchain for the coin using which you make the smart contract then yes you will be pretty much restricted to suit the coin which is acting like the "parent" for example a common coin that's used to make tokens would be Ethereum

It doesn't really help that a large number of campaign managers themselves hire bumpers and expect the participants to post "productive, constructive comments, questions and reviews" regarding the project on a regular basis

You could probably give him access temporarily to enter his address or somehow transfer the Dnotes to his address or account but the account is worthless. A little social engineering can recover them easily.

As a newbie account with negative rep your account isn't worth 20 cents atm, $20 is a freakin steal if you manage to scam sell it. It's not like you can create a newbie account in less than a minute