Вообще-то, я девочка😄🌷
И судя по твоим выражениям, лет не гораздо больше чем тебе.

А по делу: поживем увидим, всякое бывало, почему бы и моим надеждам не исполнится?
[/quote]
Тогда реклама фастум-геля это про тебя. Сочувствую, коллега.

Ну например. Вот аватар одного из девов в даппе.

Это авроракойн. Ты же знаешь что такое авроракойн, девочка? Иными словами, старики все поймут, молодежь пусть платит за свои иллюзии.

- Тебе сколько лет, мальчик?
- Будет шесть.
- Ух, какой ты большой, большой оптимист!

Ну что, все слились?

В любом случае ни в коем разе не слушать местную публику. Для 98% из них эти суммы близки к астрономическим, и это не просто так, не стечение обстоятельств.
Не знаешь что делать - положи на депозит, купи облигации (если в рашке, то ИИС вполне годная тема), физическое золото.

Volumes are pretty good, like 2-3% of all coin in existence in a day. You need more, rly?

The problem is that GBT is in paradigm of ICO coin now. After Buterium rise we have tons of easy money and people who dont deserve them floating in the system. Now they are engaging with ICO PnDs loosing steam quickly. Since GBT was ICO project it falls into their reference system in which it is an extraordinary fail. SO they dumped and move to another projects. They are dead wrong obviously and at this prices GBT presents a great opportunity if devs deliver something.

Вот про школоту это уже давно дурацкий стереотип. Даже у нас в танках средний возраст игрока 30+. И несколько десятков долларов на фан для таких людей не проблема.

...

Hi everyone!
Do we have GUI aeon wallet?

Особенно радуют параноидальная шиза про чей-то на себя заказ и влажные мечты о полонии. Ну-ка покажите мне монетку, которая получила два звезды на койнмаркете и после этого залистилась на хоть одной нормальной бирже.
Залезайте-ка друзья на свой чухонский форумок обратно, там вам самое место.

Уххх, слился наконец. Спасибо, покормили вкусно.

Потратили кучу усилий чтобы попасть на биржи, но про памп узнали из газет.
Собрали скрытый инстамайн вместо ИКО, ну вы же знаете, в какой мы стране живем. Но её жители - наша ЦА.
Делаем п2п обмен на битки. Чтобы поощрить применение в бизнесе, а не спекуляции.
А еще продали койны инвесторам, а не дали накопать всякому тупому быдлу. Кому - не надейтесь, не скажем, это большие секреты серьезных людей.
Ну а все технические косяки унаследовали у Даши. Никто не виноват - торопились к съезду 9 Мая.

П.С. Тему веду не я, а мой альтернативно одаренный племянник. Меня тут вообще быть не должно.


Сколько местных юнитов купят эту шляпу?

Да какая уж тут борьба. Сливаем монетку и досвидос.
Тот факт, что тут нет хомячков, защищающих монетку или лохов "инвесторов" из ВК, а есть один приближенный, который от бессилия изливает параноидальный бред, говорит сам за себя. Борьба окончилась не успев начаться. buy-the-dip на бирже сломлен, чирик уверенно катится на свалку криптоистории.

Вообще, забавная вышла история. Не удивлюсь, если памп осуществлялся на собственные финансы сибирских коммерсантов в надежде что его подхватят. А что, сейчас много дураков с деньгами, вылезшими из Эфира. До 10 рублей хотели дотянуть. Но вместо этого группа ушлых ветеранов индустрии дождалась возможности слить, и после этого выпостила то, что на самом деле думает касательно проекта. В итоге покормили копал, покормили старожилов, покормили биржи, а для самих толку хрен. Вот и фрустрируют.

All about scam. 31 million from 36 millions of coin supply generated in first 2 weeks.
No Emer instance running still.
Posting strings like "dns:google.com A=8.8.8.8" into blockchain is NOT a technical breakthrow.
And they run coin cartel meetings (300k+ EMC) at plain site.

Basically they're russians. Wanna invest in a coin with russian devs? Go burn your money it will save you much time.

Come on, folks.

1. Devs are russians. They always cash out at first possibility.
2. Large instamine - 85% of coin supply was generated in first month. As a consequence, uneven distribution and super-fat wallets. PoS minting only worsens the problem.
3. Almost no coverage on exchanges and horrible liquidity.

Best coin to invest, indeed.

Yday downloaded a fresh wallet and almost instantly get 19 nodes. Synced quite a fast. Maybe if you run an old wallet with old nodes recorded then it would be faster to sync it from scratch. Another way is to manually add an exchange or a pool. They always have a large list of active nodes.

Folks, what I've read in 10 latest pages is some kind of hellish nonsence.

1. You propose some "companion coin" to COLLECT PEOPLES FUNDS for development and bounties. Know what? People don't like when their fund are collected even for saving the world. This is the clear scam for the majority which will only push the public away completely since as you probably know, Quark already have at least questionable reputation.
I have a big question considering this situation. If you have a viable community why the hell it needs some questionable technical stuff to simply organise and collect some funds? If you do need this stuff for such a purpose you don't have any viable community which could actually do something visible apart from covering each other with crap on forums.

2. Don't like BIG WALLETS for them doing nothing for you? Have a bad news for you: they are part of the game as they didn't break any rules. And changing the rules will ruin the Quark for everyone it will become clear that it could be changed again and again at any unpredictable way. So I advise to kill you envy and carry on.

3. Just why you unleashed such a baiting on Kolin? Someone even said that he ruined all our efforts. If one guy on forum ruined all your efforts in something it's not his fault it's your fault for you deeds are so miserable.

Let's imagine a situation. I'm a big wallet and I want to devote some of my millions to a community project as I'm interested in Quark succes. And I'm wandering around and look. To whom? On which project? Where is even a tiny guarantee of its success? You demand them to participate in "community efforts" but where are they? All you're doing is building castles in the air, fighting forum trolls and blaming each other for the losses.
Now you probably understand why big wallets escaping, fiat and bitcoin investors don't uppear.

I'm writing this not to insult someone. Just look at yourselves and think what could be done today and in future to help the quark and each other. Everyone could do something.

Still, we have GitHub repository:
https://github.com/MaxGuevara/quark
Not everyone able to code and write tests, but everyone can write faqs, tutorials, make translations to language you know.
We have trello boards:
https://trello.com/b/1hBBvhoE/quark-planet
https://trello.com/b/HatkOwER/merge-mine-to-support-the-qrk-network-project
https://trello.com/b/tswQsadm/the-iceland-project
https://trello.com/b/DG6wKzQu/eve-online
Please don't be shy and help people there. Or offer some project by yourself. There our community could establish more civilized discussion without troll fighting and crap throwing.
Even Shibe-stile promoting in social networks forcing stupid memes will bring more than half of this topic.
If everyone devote 5 minutes of his or her precious time to this Quark eventually rise and shine. Yes, it's that simple.

A copy from reddit. http://www.reddit.com/r/QuarkCoin/comments/29vtyt/a_nonstandart_merged_mining_hashrate_solution/

What if we create a merged-mining cPoW coin (let's call it SPARK ) with STANDARD money mass distribution. 30sec 50-coin block with halving every 4 years. Spark will allow GPU-miners to loot mine the coin on a trully asic-resistant algorythm.
Merged mining means that the task of solving Spark block equals solving Quark one and all the spark hashrate automatically adds to Quark one. MM pool will distribute 2880 QRK a day and 144k SRK. Thus Quark will gain additional hashrate without hard-forks, changing economical mechanisms (PoS) or inflating its money mass.

There are three mid-term scenarios.
-- SRK will be engaged in massive mining pump-and-dump schemes and all the other activities of our free market. On its way it gain much more popularity than Quark and maybe higher price (50M SRK in first year vs. 247M QRK). Large bagholders of Quark may dump all the coins and switch to it for some time diminishing quark status to Namecoin in BTC-NMC pair. But eventually as money mass of SRk inflated and PnD fade the capital will move back for in QRK where it will be safe from inflation.
-- Noone knows and care about Spark. We loose nothing.
-- For miners QRK is additional reward for mining Sparks, but much more scarse (50 to 1). Psycologically more scarse resource is more valuable. For this reason Quark will engage in PnDs and mining activity too if such exists.

In any case we loose nothing as on the side of qUark will be only a redistribution of a minor miners' rewars which in any case rewarded to someone every block. On the other hand we could gain more hashrate and security, use CPU- and GPU-miners as a resourse. They are now frustrated and lost in ASIC hysteria and very like asic-resistant algos even if the algos are not trully such (scrypt-N or x11/13/15). If we give them something they used to and show a quark logic and phylosophy as an unnesesary option, some of them will definitely understand and join us.
I could start a bounty let's say in 20k QRKs.

Good point, TS.

30k BTC are amount of mining for a 8 days. If market panicking on this therer are 2 options^
1. People completely dont understand anything on market.
2. Price manipulation in action.

If latter then the question is by whom? Mining monopoly is a viable explanation. Not ideal but viable.

Nothing at stake or other similar technique are based on quite a poor Longest Chain Determination algorytm. And the algorytm is also responsible for diminishing PoS contribution to security.

We could demand both larger stake and larger pow difficulty to resolve the conflict iff favor of one of the chains. With this method the attacker will need both 51% of hashrate and 51% of working stake to fork blockchain as he likes. It's not ideal but with such a logic stakeholders will be able to prevent 51% PoW attack and pools will be able to reverse the chain in case of nothing-at-stake.

PoS provides:
-- additional security (different source of blocks)
-- reward for long-term adopters and holders
-- economical stimulus to maintain a full node

PoS if implemented won't spoil Quark monetary model (0.4% or 0.5% inflation p.a. is a little price)
PoS don't even connected with price or a position on a graphics. It's pure techical issue, an additional layer of security, an important one on a low hashrate.

And this is serious. Need to do some research.