There was a reason for that. We knew we had a long lead time.. and what we were releasing was quickly being copied and made it's way into several other projects whitepapers who have gone on to launch their own ICOs off our materials. So with that we felt it best to keep things to be released closer to when they are actually released lest a first mover advantage or confusion over who made what first happens.

That code that is public is of course public.. and demonstrates our capability to execute on what we are doing.

I understand some people itching to dig into the guts of this for their own curiosity, but sadly there are others in the world who dig for other reasons.

Hope this is understandable.

Tier 1 is now sold out.

Tier 2 is selling...

www.peerplays.com

Testify! 

I appreciate the attempt at analysis of some kind.. but so many of these questions have already been answered many times over in many places. We also are available online to answer questions all the time. All you have to do is ask. Regardless, lets answer some of the questions here:




Asked time and again... and we have said time and again the remaining tokens simply will be unminted.



I looked for a question but saw none. Just observations of anything that could be cast in a negative light. Regardless of a reddit channel we never gained traction in, or a few chat channels that you had some trouble with or don't have a lot of activity in because there is more activity elsewhere, or a bitcointalk thread that we paid little attention too because we were engaged directly with people asking us questions... we have a working profit sharing gaming platform blockchain which launches in just over two weeks with or without some people.

If you're interest is in this bitcointalk thread you can go back to the beginnings where people couldn't understand how their $2-$3 'priced too high' presale tokens started trading at $10 then $20 then $30 nd ending at $42 each in less than six months. How we skyrocketed to #9 in Coinmarketcap in the end.

I highly recommend once again for anybody who wants the facts and want to really know what is going on to simply sign up on Telegram @Peerplays.. we have an awesome community forming and now have as of writing this 244 members.

Well.. some facts: We closed last time at a $42m market cap.. today we are coming out at $30m market cap.. so there is room to grow.. this was at a time when a $42m market cap had us in the TOP 10 of CMC.. we were #9. Today that same spot is occupied by a project that at the same time we were valued at $42m was valued at $18m.. and is now sitting at $347m... its all speculation at this stage.. its amazing whats going on though.

The blockchain is launching.. with or without you. Our presale had people saying these exact same things at $2 to $3 when we had nothing but a whitepaper to show. Today we have a team of 25 developers worldwide, proven ability to deliver on our milestones... and a working technology and already have raised nearly $5 million.

These attempts to misdirect on price have increasingly seemed more like an attempt to shake us down to lower it in some fashion when we have in fact already come in at a discount. ICO dumpers just cant see it.. and really who wants them in a starting blockchain?

1. Witnesses are block signers. They cannot generate on their own.. it is predetermined in the code.
2. 3 second or less blocks.
3. In theory unlimited. We will have to put a number in the code though, so will start with 1000 upper limit.. more likely to start with 15 or so.
4. Hard limit in the code similar to bitcoin 21m we have set at 15m.

Once again the persistence of false narrative is showcased in this final post.

All I can do is repeat once again what was already stated in the same transparent and very detailed and clear language we have illustrated throughout this project since it started:

www.peerplays.com/docs/Peerplays_Bulletin-Feb_2017.pdf

Everyone should study this for themselves. The document is significant. Many professionals and legal counsel contributed to this document and it passed through many layers of approval before it was made public. We take communication very seriously and went to great lengths to provide more transparency than what is the defacto. So to say we have been 'misleading' in any way is a stark mischaracterization of the facts and our clearly demonstrated intentions over the span of nearly a year.

Join us in @Peerplays Telegram Group.. feel free to ask questions.

Published February 21 a week before the crowdfund started:

www.peerplays.com/docs/Peerplays_Bulletin-Feb_2017.pdf

In here we have given great detail of all distributions including the UIA 10:1 allotment which is being claimed above as being unknown.

In regards to "shady to freeze the price at peak without announcing".. I completely agree that is seriously shady. Good thing we gave everyone two weeks notice prior to closing the markets in order for them to buy/sell/hold as they saw fit:

www.peerplays.com/news/important-announcement-peerplays-snapshot-date/

The only market that was open was Bitshares DEX, the most transparent market in the world that operates on a decentralized blockchain. We had no involvement in the trading that took place. It's all public and on the blockchain, so anybody can certainly check into it.

I could go on, but I trust everyone can judge for themselves at this point.

So for all the newcomers, you are welcome to check into the facts of the matter rather that this. Join our Telegram group @Peerplays and ask questions.

Market cap at previous trading ended at $42million and placed Peerplays at #9 at that time on Coinmarketcap before markets were closed for the snapshot.

Today, as you noted in price, the project would be coming into the market with a launched blockchain and a very solid roadmap this year at $30m which by todays standards places the project at #34 on Coinmarketcap.

Regardless this does bring us in at less than where we left off in the market to give us room for growth considering we have now had six months of further development on top of that.

This is fairly reasonable for something this far along in development and about to launch into production.

As for your other commentaries about most for devs and angels seems a bit exaggerated. About 33% is from people who initially funded the prototype in our presale, and 16% is to founders which are locked up for a year. Doesn't constitute most.

Aside from all of these things. This is a profit sharing blockchain. The first ever. Holding a PPY token means getting a basket of the most used crypto currencies out there be it BTC, ETH, DASH, or BitUSD. This is a unique value proposition available only with Peerplays. How much is that worth compared to a speculative token alone is up for each individual to decide.

Not sure what this is in response too. June is a few days and month from now.

They are $5 now in Tier 1 of the crowdsale.

I can only assume you mean the testnet announcement from last year. We launched it for a limited time to allow those that held Peerplays tokens to be able to check how much was available in the sharedrop with Bitshares. Since then though we had to reload the genesis and didn't include those tokens in further testing.

It was only for testing purposes to allow people to check what their balances might be close to when the Peerplays Blockchain launches.

If however this is your account in Bitshares where your balance is zero. Either you had your Peerplays on the market and they sold, or your account was hacked somehow.

The Peerplays Bulletin details all of this in full transparency and was open for public review weeks prior to the launch of the crowdfund.

Section 3 - Token Information gives a full detail of the distribution. The strategic donations amount to 1 mill PPY tokens. The $4mill means thats they paid $4 per token. This is effectively only a 20% difference from where the public sale started. In addition to this, that 20% difference of the strategic doners has to be locked up for at least six months. This was done in the interest of ensuring stable markets following launch and ensuring alignment of interests.

In case anyone missed it, here is a link to the document: https://www.peerplays.com/docs/Peerplays_Bulletin-Feb_2017.pdf

You can review the details in the Peerplays Bulletin under SECTION 2:

https://www.peerplays.com/docs/Peerplays_Bulletin-Feb_2017.pdf

Project will continue  and blockchain will launch on schedule May 30th, 2017 and less tokens will be minted in the scenario we do not reach the full $5m.