Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 58 results by Bushuqa
hi, could anyone direct me to where i can find resources on "HOW YOU CAN USE LibraryCredits? "
are those coins useful right now do they have any real applicability i couldn't find to many resources around that
thx
are those coins useful right now do they have any real applicability i couldn't find to many resources around that
thx
How long etherum will be dug using the pow for sia so long will be cheap. 
[/quote
why is that, could you explain?
[/quote
why is that, could you explain?
hi, could anyone direct me to where i can find resources on HOW YOU CAN USE GAMECREDITS?
are those coins useful right now do they have any real applicability i couldn't find to many resources around that
thx
are those coins useful right now do they have any real applicability i couldn't find to many resources around that
thx
Re: Banca Transilvania iti blocheaza contul daca tranzactionezi cu BITCOIN
am facut ieri o cerere prin bt24 sa depun bani in kraken
Am cateva intrebari:
1- este posibil ca BT sa imi blocheze contul pt depunere in kraken?
2-Pot anula tranzactia la o zi dupa cererea facuta prin bt24?
3-cand blocheaza contul la depunere sau retragere sau ambele?
4-daca iti blocheaza contul ce se intampla mai exact? cand iti retragi banii?
thx
Am cateva intrebari:
1- este posibil ca BT sa imi blocheze contul pt depunere in kraken?
2-Pot anula tranzactia la o zi dupa cererea facuta prin bt24?
3-cand blocheaza contul la depunere sau retragere sau ambele?
4-daca iti blocheaza contul ce se intampla mai exact? cand iti retragi banii?
thx
I do not think that is unrealistic in a way that if it keeps going.
I mean any coin that goes until 2025, than it will make it to one dollar, If the core or the community let it go it goes to 1 satoshi each and than dies away, if it is kept alive it goes to one dollar.
I mean any coin that goes until 2025, than it will make it to one dollar, If the core or the community let it go it goes to 1 satoshi each and than dies away, if it is kept alive it goes to one dollar.
wow .. now thats a bold statement
sorry to say it but without some strong reality backed arguments that sounds silly to say the least..
could you be so kind and argument you view ?
why do you think that?
Well that kind of a price would actually be impossible, at least i think so.. 10-30 cents could be a possibility, that still high if u look at the current price
$1 in 2020/2025 is realistic
with such claim i would have thought that your blog has some siacoin related articles, but did not find any..
just to understand where i coming from:
- i own siacoin,
-i believe in their project
-i try to understand more
eu nu inteleg 2 chestii
1- cum spuneti ca cex are preturi ok cand eu vad ca poti cumpara cu 1000 usd 0.8581 btc cand acum btc-ul pe poloniex este 1100 , daca calculezi o sa vezi ca diferenta este uriasa nu doar de cativa dolari
2- bitstamp nu merge in romania sa iti verifici contul din cate stiu, nu ii accepta documentele
1- cum spuneti ca cex are preturi ok cand eu vad ca poti cumpara cu 1000 usd 0.8581 btc cand acum btc-ul pe poloniex este 1100 , daca calculezi o sa vezi ca diferenta este uriasa nu doar de cativa dolari
2- bitstamp nu merge in romania sa iti verifici contul din cate stiu, nu ii accepta documentele
roger that...chrrhrrh
sa nu te deranjeze sa dai 15-20% in plus ar insemna sa fii inconstient dupa parerea mea..
cex cred ca are preturi mari deasemenea ca nu cred ca il cumperi cu l-ai cumpara de pe poloniex
over...chrrhrrh
sa nu te deranjeze sa dai 15-20% in plus ar insemna sa fii inconstient dupa parerea mea..
cex cred ca are preturi mari deasemenea ca nu cred ca il cumperi cu l-ai cumpara de pe poloniex
over...chrrhrrh
hey! guys!
care to read the title ?
I guess the user starting this post had something else in mind.
"Re: Steem pyramid scheme revealed"
This topic/forum needs some moderators, pronto!
care to read the title ?
I guess the user starting this post had something else in mind.
"Re: Steem pyramid scheme revealed"
This topic/forum needs some moderators, pronto!
LOL
The "user" starting this "topic" definetly had something else in mind.
He is inactive since 2 September 2016 and 65 out of his 66 posts are FUD and nonsense about STEEM! He created his newbie account just to FUD and then he dissapeared in to the mist...
yeah but the points that he made do make sense he has a strong point if you pay attention to it
I do not think the post is about him but to attract attention to some things that people might be missing
If i say that the politicians are corrupt but i steal an apple from the market that does not change the reality that i pointed to
Why storej is so cheap compared with sia? Sia has much larger market cap than storej which is too undervalued.
i think what you meant is the opposite
why is sia so cheap compared to storj
Re: Atentie la ING Bank! Conturi inchise permanent fara un motiv exact
eu nu ma refeream la o modalitate ilegala ci intrebam daca este o cale legala prin care sa nu determini banca sa iti inchida contul pe motiv va bitcoin nu este reglementat.
Este bine de stiu bitcoin nu este ilegal deci nu ai motive sa te ascunzi sau sa faci ceva ilegal
Este bine de stiu bitcoin nu este ilegal deci nu ai motive sa te ascunzi sau sa faci ceva ilegal
i bought at 62(did not even know about this thread) not very happy now but i have a question:
where do you think siacoin could be in 1-3 years?
Could we expect a 10.000 X or maybe just a 2-10x type of increase?
Many people complain about the ICO 24B is this something that will stop it from reaching prices over 1$-10$ like the big coins, or that could be possible?
What i am asking is: could such a coin ever be 10-100$ or do you find that unlikely?
Thanks
where do you think siacoin could be in 1-3 years?
Could we expect a 10.000 X or maybe just a 2-10x type of increase?
Many people complain about the ICO 24B is this something that will stop it from reaching prices over 1$-10$ like the big coins, or that could be possible?
What i am asking is: could such a coin ever be 10-100$ or do you find that unlikely?
Thanks
may be sia need work hard to catch up storj.
It seems many people are interested in the comparison of Sia and Storj. I don't think Sia looks Storj as a competitor. Sia only looks the centralized clouds as the competitors such as Amazon S3. The goal of Sia is to over take Amazon S3.
If you really want to compare these two projects, the best way to do so is to check their github activities and run these two softwares to figure it out yourselves.
If you don't know how to check the github activities and you are too lazy to run the softwares you have to rely on other people's opinions. But you still can choose to rely on some reliable sources with data and facts which other people have aggregated. You need data and facts, not just words. Here are some reliable sources for you to refer to:
https://www.coingecko.com/en (projects ranking and pay attention to the Delevoper column)
www.coinmarketcap.com (marketcap ranking)
https://thecontrol.co/meet-sia-a-user-owned-amazon-s3-challenger-that-lets-you-rent-out-your-extra-disk-space-fa9da6ff9223#.9mrlonvf7 (in the middle of this article, there is a nice graph with data to compare Sia, storj, and maidsafe)
on coingecko even dodgecoin which is mostly dead and no development is being done , still scores a healthy 72% in the developer column, how do you explain that?
According to their website:
A key part of Sia's approach to stopping Sybil attackers is proof-of-burn. Hosts burn coins by sending them to a provably unspendable address. Hosts are expected to burn a portion of their revenue (~4%) as a demonstration that they are real. Renters will select hosts that have burned coins with a probability that grows in a linear relationship to the total number of coins burned. Therefore, a host that has burned 2x as many coins will be twice as likely to be selected as another host that has all other factors the same. This provides a very important defence against Sybil attacks.
Is this something that deals with the problem you pointed out?
more on that here : https://forum.sia.tech/topic/108/how-sia-works
A key part of Sia's approach to stopping Sybil attackers is proof-of-burn. Hosts burn coins by sending them to a provably unspendable address. Hosts are expected to burn a portion of their revenue (~4%) as a demonstration that they are real. Renters will select hosts that have burned coins with a probability that grows in a linear relationship to the total number of coins burned. Therefore, a host that has burned 2x as many coins will be twice as likely to be selected as another host that has all other factors the same. This provides a very important defence against Sybil attacks.
Is this something that deals with the problem you pointed out?
more on that here : https://forum.sia.tech/topic/108/how-sia-works