It's an operating-system issue, not a Dash/Bitcoin/WhatEverCoin problem.

The operating systems using those glibc versions (means: most Linux distributions)  are vulnerable, therefore ALL software not statically linked to a 'safe' glibc version/replacement is vulnerable.

Update your Linux once a fix is available and you'll be okay.

I think the key is to keep it in Dash and let the people take the volatility. I think we forget that for long periods of time last year Dash was in a downtrend. So for example it happened to me before that I would fund a certain initiative with X amount of Dash and then the price will go down and by the time I recover the exact same amount of Dash back the FIAT equivalent was less. So should I have gotten more Dash to match the FIAT equivalent of when I funded the DASH?  My answer was no, I am happy with getting the same amount of DASH because I am long in the project.

So I think the same applies the other way around people should get the same amount of Dash they initially agreed even if the price is going up. That creates network effects and everyone wins when the price goes up.

For example, and this is just hypothetical lets say Coinbase requires a 10K DASH payment ahead of time to integrate Dash to their service. But we decide to split it up in 6 payments not to clutter the budget space. Then when the news is announced the price of Dash rallies. Does that mean that by the 4th month we are going to start saying we should not be paying Coinbase their full 10K because the price went up?  Of course not, we need to pay our full agreement, that is how business works, and people making money with us is a good thing.  After 6 months Coinbase would be paid, we kept our word and our reputation and we have a way larger budget to work with. That is just my opinion of course, but I feel strongly about it.

FeelTheBern, I agree with you. There needs to be transparency with the PR campaign.

But man, you're really are spamming the crap out of this. And the logs from slack show you were spamming in there as well. I know it doesn't feel that way, I can tell you feel strongly about your opinion and you are just expressing it in a way you feel is appropriate. But you have to try to put yourself in everyone else's shoes and see it from a different prospective.

I know you are not a troll, you are just pissed off because you take this very personally. Please realize this is not the best way to get people to listen to you and understand your cause.


You are obviously not the only one who feels like there needs to be more transparency, but you are the only one kicking and screaming and that does not help. I hope you can understand this and that I haven't offended you.

How do you figure? By my math we experienced 16% inflation for 2016 and will have about 12.6% inflation in 2017, then 10.55%. I've actually never thought of any of these cryptographic currencies as deflationary, they are constantly creating coins until they stop at some point; the only deflation comes from coins being destroyed or lost.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RpLd87PTs65sz8USrrXwGRoVGVbzaC-nunErEtGSJoE/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=0

I recall there were at least couple of variations of that.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg10502421;topicseen#msg10502421

and

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg10900376;topicseen#msg10900376

 

I've looked all over and cannot find a thing...

I'm looking for a type of Darkcoin/DASH chart that was published here many many months ago
It has 4 different charts on the same screen
Black background - and very similar to dashwisdom style.....

ANY - help locating a link - of even the source code/script - would be great :-D

thx in advance to any kind soul that can locate said chart...


[very important]


:-D

how big is "to big" and how long does this take to happen ?

link?

The masternode graph's gone a bit wonky.

i guess he is referring to shared Masternodes. i agree that a safer solution to shared MNs is crucial for the inclusion of small DASH holders