Iowa: Walker is e Benjamin's leading by a huge margin (25% vs 13% to Paul). There is not much time, and Rand may not win this state.
NH: As per the latest polls, Walker is again leading this state with Cruz in the 2nd position (24% vs 14%).
SC: The main fight seems to be between Walker and Bush.

Looking at the opinion polls, I am pessimistic about his chances.

The major problem with this woman is not so much her awful stances on the issues but her and her husband have a significant track record of being corrupt and using everyone around themselves for their gain - many people have ended up indicted or in jail and even dead for being part of their endeavors. IF Obama promised transparency and has turned out to be anything but, including being terrible towards whistleblowers, then Hillary will be even worse as she merely tries to lie her way out of things and she religiously gets the benefit of the doubt cause she's a woman and a very liberal one at that. She's also very supportive of the military industrial complex and the banking/insider govt complex so she's got strong interests behind her which is why she can get away with all these obvious negative things.

There is plenty of text in Islam on all the issues you just mentioned. You are too dumb to research and just making a perception based on falsehood portrayed by western media. If you'll go through Islamic social code you'll find it a perfection and miracle itself.

She is almost certain to win the elections in 2016. The demography has changed radically. There is a steep growth in the number of Mexican voters, and a moderate growth in the number of the black voters. Both these sections will vote overwhelmingly for her.

Well this was only pointed out because there was an argument made that ISIS is not Islamic because Islam doesn't allow that and this was provided to point out that it was done in Islam and it was allowed.

Also, whether it can be proven by dna testing that who's the father of the child or not is a different matter, the point is, if a man is allowed to have 4 wives at once in Islam, than women should be allowed the same.

And it doesn't matter if she was 9 -10 -12, the point is she was a kid and it also doesn't matters if he did it once, it still makes him a pedophile for having sex with a kid.

It's morally wrong and disgusting and it doesn't matter if you had sex with 1 kid or many.

They define it as probability. Yes, it can tell who is your father sometimes but not all time and you will have to rely on probability mostly. When paternal parent issue comes, when 4 husbands are invloved, it is not that easy. Also think what they will do if more than one sperm fertilizes the egg? It is very complex and lead to complex situations. This can theoretically be enough but practically it isn't.(not always)


'Aisha was matured when 'Aisha started living with prophet. 'Aisha was 10-12 years old and in hot places, girls tend to reach puberty faster.

Nope, it wasn't "bought". It was nikkah.

Muhammad(PBUH) only married to ONE virgin and that is 'Aisha. All others were widows. If prophet was pedophiles or rapist, marrying more matured girls or virgins would have made sense.

Also in old traditions, the bond between two persons/familty were increased through marriage. This is also another reason of that marriage.

I believe it will be difficult for Hillary Clinton to overcome the hurdles of the Benghazi incident as well as the illegalities of her maintaining a State Department email server in her home/office and unlawfully deleting a potion of those emails that were legally required to be stored in the National Archives, let alone her deficiencies during the Bill Clinton administration and her time as Senator. These are all serious issues and blatantly unlawful and even some felonious activities. Opponents may even bring up Whitewater and other scandals from decades past to add more to the list.

The Email Scanel Issues of legality, or a lack thereof:

• The Federal Records Act requires agencies hold onto official communications, including all work-related emails, and government employees cannot destroy or remove relevant records. - http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2008-title44/pdf/USCODE-2008-title44-chap31-sec3101.pdf
• FOIA is designed to "improve public access to agency records and information," and those emails are public information if not determined to be state secrets, which they have not. Mrs. clinton does not ahve the authority to bdetermine them to be state secrets. - http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-104publ231/html/PLAW-104publ231.htm
• The NARA regulations dictate how records should be created and maintained. They stress that materials must be maintained "by the agency," that they should be "readily found" and that the records must "make possible a proper scrutiny by the Congress." - http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2012-title36-vol3/pdf/CFR-2012-title36-vol3-part1222.pdf
• Section 1924 of Title 18 has to do with deletion and retention of classified documents. "Knowingly" removing or housing classified information at an "unauthorized location" is subject to a fine or a year in prison. - http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2009-title18/pdf/USCODE-2009-title18-partI-chap93-sec1924.pdf

Now, it will probably never be known what exactly was in those deleted emails, but we do know that she blatantly broke the law and by maintaining the private email server for government use and deleted those emails. We can surmise that she didnt want anyone reading them because of their content. Then we can assume they - or some of them - concerned the Benghazi incident. It's unknown whether or not she will be indicted, but you dont need an indictment to be considered political poison, because you have her blatantly breaking the law in so many ways. Then then there is her conflicting and combative testimony before Congress.

All that said, Elizabeth Warren has always stated that she will never run against Hillary Clinton, so I believe Elizabeth Warren's appearance on the political stage for presidential candidacy for the 2016 race will be the determining factor for the DNC's decision whether or not they deem Hillary Clinton as electable in 2016, so keep an eye on Elizabeth Warren to understand how the DNC views Hillary's electabiliy.

I don't think they fully know what they're up to themselves. That's why they're up for messing around with it. I settle on none of the options so far.

No bank, other than a central one, has ever made its own currency and they're not going to start now. They might look for solutions for inter bank and international transfers. They might look at tokenisation like mintchip.

It'll be interesting to see if there are any conclusions and innovations. They might come up with nowt or grudgingly start to look at integrating Bitcoin in a modest way. There's a role they could play there.