Search content
Sort by

Showing 5 of 5 results by Casawi
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Have one in full or just part?
by
Casawi
on 12/10/2023, 20:54:28 UTC

In other words, it will only be useful for the wallet you currently have or that you create after having part of the node assembled. It even makes sense. If it is something older, it can no longer obtain all the transaction information.

But, if you think about it, the same thing will happen in a new wallet, if it only has part of the knot. Older transactions are no longer listed in the wallet. Or am I wrong?

Yeah, you know the pruned node will only have just few 100 blocks, so transaction below that few 100 blocks associated to the key will need to be updated and this can be done by downloading everything again. So if you’re just going to use a new created wallet after that hundreds it will be possible. Not much other than not having the benefit of sync the full blockchain

But the other part is you using a pruned node means you’re trusting a third party

Undoubtedly, a pruned node has significant drawbacks, particularly in terms of transaction history,its important to think about your particular use case and if the advantages of a full node outweigh the space and trust issues.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Have one in full or just part?
by
Casawi
on 12/10/2023, 20:47:41 UTC
Many advantages, one is that you get to import a new key on the wallet, but if it is half node I think you cannot run another wallet (imported key) on it. Because an importing a wallet will need transaction history of that wallet and it might be that the few blocks there will not have all of them available.

In other words, it will only be useful for the wallet you currently have or that you create after having part of the node assembled. It even makes sense. If it is something older, it can no longer obtain all the transaction information.

But, if you think about it, the same thing will happen in a new wallet, if it only has part of the knot. Older transactions are no longer listed in the wallet. Or am I wrong?


It would appear that having a full node provides benefits particularly if you want to import new keys into your wallet.you might not be able to use multiple wallets or access historical transaction data if a pruned node only has a piece of the blockchain another issue can be having faith in a third party.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Sniffing LN traffic with Wireshark
by
Casawi
on 12/10/2023, 10:36:05 UTC
It appears that you just want Wireshark to note the packets associated with Bitcoin and the Lightning Network in the protocol column without necessarily analysing them. Although Wireshark may not be able to classify them by default, you can construct display filters to aid in identification.

To concentrate on traffic that is associated with Bitcoin, use a display filter like bitcoin. To reduce the number of results in the Lightning Network, employ a filter similar to lightning. The packets in the Info column that match those keywords will be highlighted by these filters.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: I can't keep up with the High gas fees
by
Casawi
on 03/10/2023, 15:33:28 UTC
I'm an average person with some tech knowledge, and after facing the challenges of inflation, I ventured into the world of cryptocurrency this past year. I'd like to raise what I see as a significant contradiction. I believe it's quite disconnected for many individuals in this community to advocate for self-custody and crypto adoption while simultaneously expecting the average person to tolerate exorbitant gas fees.

When I mention "high gas fees," I'm referring to fees that surpass the current charges imposed by Visa and Mastercard. After all, decentralized finance (DeFi) aims to compete in this space. Is it reasonable to anticipate that individuals investing thousands of dollars should be content with paying tens of dollars in gas fees for each transaction, especially during what we consider "busy" periods?

What do you think would be a solution to this not everyone would be able to keep up with this especially in everyday transactions?


Many people, especially the typical person, may be discouraged from adopting cryptocurrencies for regular transactions or even for investing because of high transaction fees.

Scalability is one of the main issues with cryptocurrencies, especially Ethereum, which is a well-liked blockchain for DEFEI applications. With Ethereum 2.0, which strives to increase network capacity and lower fees, and layer 2 solutions like Optimistic Rollups and sidechains, this issue has been addressed. Ethereum has also been working on ways to solve high petrol fees.
We can anticipate the emergence of more user-friendly applications and interfaces as the crypto ecosystem develops. These platforms will attempt to remove the customer from the technical details of petrol fees, resulting in a smoother, more user-friendly experience.
The cryptocurrency industry is really cutthroat.Additionally, a number of other blockchains and networks are emerging that provide quicker processing times and lower transaction fees. If the exorbitant fees on the current networks continue, users might begin looking at alternatives.
 Changes in regulations can have a big impact on the bitcoin industry. Petrol prices and the whole user experience may be affected if governments impose stronger rules on cryptocurrency exchanges and DeFi platforms.The problem is recognised by the cryptocurrency industry and its developers, who are working diligently to find solutions. They are aware of the necessity to increase public awareness about cryptocurrency.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Zksync transaction checker for those doing retroactive airdrop
by
Casawi
on 01/10/2023, 19:37:30 UTC
I’m wondering if there’s still a plan for launching their own native token because it’s taking a lot of time since most of the blockchain that developed same time with them already launched their own airdrop. Are you still bridging on this L2 project?
Yes they have hinted before about their airdrop and potential launched. Im not sure why it took them so long to release maybe because the market is still not good and they are aiming it when the bull is there. Lots of airdrop tokens arent that much have raised their price so if you think about it. So they are not gonna tried to have a lousy launch.

It appears that market targeting conditions may be related to the delayed release of airdrops do economic variables influence the timing of product launches like this if they are targeting the market when circumstances are favourable?

There are numerous airdrop models whose prices have not significantly increased could the lack of demand for these goods be the cause of this?!!or does this suggest that there are market obstacles making a successful launch tough to achieve?