Search content
Sort by

Showing 11 of 11 results by ChloeST
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Topic OP
How bitcoins are the perfect chips for poker
by
ChloeST
on 31/07/2011, 14:33:15 UTC
I found a neat article describing how bitcoins are perfect for poker. What do you guys think?

http://grinderhouse.squarespace.com/home/2011/7/30/the-perfect-chips-for-poker.html
Post
Topic
Board Marketplace
Re: 5 BTC Bounty - break site and help community (and earn 5 coins!)
by
ChloeST
on 20/07/2011, 15:31:19 UTC
Sorry for stating that the small blind could be stolen without verifying completely. I've played so much heads up poker that it became automatic for me to think that if the small blind doesn't do anything they lose. I was also trying to emphasize that I had found a bug, but if nobody can reproduce the missing buttons bug (not the blind stealing) then I guess it's a moot point. I've tried to reproduce the situation just today, but I cannot after two tries, maybe the code on the server has changed since then?
Post
Topic
Board Marketplace
Re: 5 BTC Bounty - break site and help community (and earn 5 coins!)
by
ChloeST
on 17/07/2011, 16:18:55 UTC
Thanks for the BTC, but the kind of problem that I was describing is a kind of attack on users running firefox and chrome browsers: I can make them not have buttons in a first-to-act situation every time.

In other words, I'm running an opera browser, and "stealing" the small blind of a user who is waiting at a table is very easy. The browser featured on screen in the video is firefox, I make the firefox browser have no buttons by running opera on a separate computer.

I'm sure I can make the first person to act in a full ring game that is already running not have buttons just by sitting down with an opera browser.
Post
Topic
Board Marketplace
Re: 5 BTC Bounty - break site and help community (and earn 5 coins!)
by
ChloeST
on 17/07/2011, 14:45:40 UTC
Please find the screencast of this bug here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iPtCCIxw9A

The reproduction of the bug is fairly simple, have testing01 sit at a table and have testing02 join. I'm guessing the problem lies in the uncommon browser used by testing02. There are no buttons available for the testing01 who is first-to-act. Reloading is performed with ctrl-r on both platforms. Reloading testing01's table does not fix the problem. Reloading testing02's table makes the buttons reappear even though the missing buttons are on testing01's platform.

testing01 is running:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686;en-US;rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110615 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.18

testing02 is running:
Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; en) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.50

In the video the first two out of three runs I reload testing02's table and the buttons reappear. In the third run I try reloading testing01's table and it doesn't have any effect, then one last time I reload testing02's table and the buttons reappear.

Please deposit funds here:
1BuTSJ7iNPYqJKY57ZAuZhjfEi7KaLpwn6
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Unable to compile bitcoin
by
ChloeST
on 17/07/2011, 12:44:26 UTC
I have tried compiling using the default instructions under Ubuntu and was not able to succeed.
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Pitfalls of Bitcoin
by
ChloeST
on 17/07/2011, 12:40:29 UTC
bitcoins are not imaginary, you can imagine all the fake bitcoins you want, but they will never be useable in a transaction
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Introduce yourself :)
by
ChloeST
on 17/07/2011, 10:36:05 UTC
loving the bitcoin revolution, I'm a freedom lover, and it's time to let free currency shine
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Newbie restrictions
by
ChloeST
on 17/07/2011, 10:33:42 UTC
I've been around for quite a while, but I am still labeled as a newbie as of today.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin Signed Binaries
by
ChloeST
on 29/05/2011, 12:22:14 UTC
I have to ask why there are no signed binaries of the Bitcoin Clients? The bitcoin client is the center of what should be a very secure system for an individual. (Unless their primary accounts are on MtGox or a similar site, in which case they have to trust ssl and MtGox.)

On Windows the binary has no digital signature on the executable. Other less important software has digital signatures (media players, games, even poker clients are signed (PartyPoker is signed with a Thawte verified certificate).

On linux, there are no hashes available of the current distribution .tar.gz. Ubuntu offers hashes of their product through a ssl encrypted page: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuHashes

PGP signatures for communication with bitcoin developers are readily available on the bitcoin.org front page next to their email addresses. Why aren't there verifiable gpg signatures for the binary downloads also available?
Post
Topic
Board Obsolete (selling)
want to sell $40 USD MoneyPak for Bitcoins
by
ChloeST
on 27/05/2011, 17:00:34 UTC
A MoneyPak is cash-code that you can put in a prepaid card account or PayPal account. By entering the code you will be credited with the cash immediately, it cannot be reversed like a PayPal transfer. To be clear: the cost of the MoneyPak was $44.95 to me (4.95 fee), the value of the code you will receive is $40. There is no fee when you enter the moneypak code.

https://www.moneypak.com/ReloadHowItWorks.aspx

I'm willing to send the MoneyPak code first to a poster that I can verify is a trusted trader, but I would like to verify who these trusted users are before I send the moneypak. This will take time so the exchange rate will probably change by the time we make the trade. However if you are interested in a $40 money pak for bitcoins please leave a message in this thread.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Necessary protocol improvement; dissent on future mining configuration
by
ChloeST
on 27/05/2011, 12:45:38 UTC
How can the cost of transactions become arbitarily high? Mining is a competitive enterprise right now. There is a option in the client to select a maximum processing fee, doesnt this communicate to transaction processors how much they can make by securing your transaction? If clients pay less than it costs to secure the transaction, the transaction is not processed. But if the processor is too greedy and doesn't accept low fees, he will be driven out of the processing market by a processor who is willing to accept the lower fee. The key is that the software is open and free, so the market for processing is huge, and there will always be competition.

Bitcoin has many tangible benefits for its users in comparision to regular finance: anonymity, security, universal acceptance (eventually). The value transfered to processors is well worth the benefits to the client, or clients would not use the system. Some value MUST be transfered to processors, because processing takes energy to undertake, and energy is not free in any sense.

The a question posed is "how many miners do we want?", the answer is we don't want ANY "pro miners".

Currently there are people heavily invested in mining: "pro miners". This group is an anomaly, almost a cancer that has grown on the system. Will these "pro miners" shut down and dissapear once their business becomes anything less than lucrative? For sure. Will bitcoin transactions slow to a crawl? Eventually they will. Will the curency devaluate relative to dollars? Eventually it will. But the currency will always have non-zero value due to its scarcity and it is and always will be traded for other goods/currencies. We can sit back and watch the variance while the system takes time to mature and become a well distributed system where the only miners and payment processors are the users themselves.