1. We will not be using TxID's to monitor withdrawals and we will be polling our databases for negative balances before allowing withdrawals.

Perhaps the above sentence is a bit to esoteric leading to the ambiguity you have experienced. We'll look into rewording it.

The sentence is making two separate statements, the first part is a direct response to the transaction malleability issue which had affected MtGox. The second part is referring to an issue which befell poloniex, their withdrawal system did not check for negative balances and thus a user could become 'overdrawn' due to other issues in the way their withdrawal code was written. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=499580
When we were developing our service we trawled through many exchange theft threads with the purpose of securing ourselves as well as we can.



2. Our withdrawal system performs cryptographic audit of user balance before admin can manually approve all withdrawal requests.

This sentence builds on the 'polling databases for negative balances' statement. We check the arithmetic of all actions the user has made since their balance was last 0. This includes cross referencing new deposits on our db with the blockchain just in case there was a large fork and our main daemon was on the wrong side past the deposit confirmation threshold.



3. Physical Security
"I am guessing it is a locked door that any bank theft can break thru "

You've made it abundantly clear that no physical security will be enough for you so I'm guessing your preceding question was rhetorical.

In this situation the VPN is acting as a proxy.

I see the deposit showing on our site, let me know if there is anything else you need assistance with ^^

I've looked into this for you. Our wallet is showing the following when I try to run gettransaction on your txID:
error: {"code":-5,"message":"No information available about transaction"}

We are currently on block 4636 and this is increasing roughly every minute so I am confident we are upto date with the blockchain.
I also tried to search your txID on the blockexplorer(cryptobe) given in the OP but it showed nothing; it is worth noting that cryptobe is showing their latest block as 2795 so that may be why.
I cannot find any other independent way to verify your deposit and we have successful deposits from other users so I would guess perhaps its a fork or a bug in the wallet. If we had a working block explorer we could ascertain the truth independently.

If the coins have still not shown up could you provide a txID?

Hi guys,

EAGS market is now live at LazyCoins https://lazycoins.com/trade#EAGS-btc

Follow us on twitter for news and updates https://twitter.com/LazyCoins

Thanks

Thanks for the prompt advice, I tried this but the issue persists. Does this coin need an odd version of libboost?

I'm getting this compile error on ubuntu 14.04.1

obj/walletdb.o: In function `copy_file':
/usr/local/include/boost/filesystem/operations.hpp:497: undefined reference to `boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file(boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::path const&, boost::filesystem::detail::copy_option, boost::system::error_code*)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [eagsd] Error 1

There's no doc folder and no discernible documentation for this coin.
Please advise.

Hi does this coin use the bitcoin RPC API & can anyone direct me to the daemon build instructions because it isn't obvious on the github how to compile the wallet.

Hi guys,

XDE market is now live at LazyCoins https://lazycoins.com/trade#XDE-btc

Follow us on twitter for news and updates https://twitter.com/LazyCoins

Thanks

You're saying chrome has a larger attack surface which is true but I doubt it has more exploits(per arbitrary unit of time such as month) than IE, if I'm wrong then I don't mind being corrected.

Im on     "version" : "v1.1.0.0",

I used the master branch to compile from source yesterday.
So do you have any working nodes you can share?

Thanks for the reply, perhaps your presumption of his intent is correct. I'd just want to remind everyone that we are still in beta, we do not intent to remain a low volume exchange (or only crypto to crypto.) As for the two bugs you've mentioned. The KHC trade history we are aware of and it's being fixed however I didn't know about the IE11 issue. O.O People still use IE? Or is it a computer at your work that forcing this? Either way I'll look into it

In what way is lazycoins unreliable? If you've had an unresolved issue with our site I can try to help you.

Hi guys,

BTMI market is now live at LazyCoins https://lazycoins.com/trade#btmi-btc

Follow us on twitter for news and updates https://twitter.com/LazyCoins

Finally if there is a .png coin icon you'd like us to use can you please pm me a link to it

Thanks

Hi I've added all of these nodes but I still have no connections in the daemon. Can somebody give me a *working* node or two please.

It can slow down withdrawals because by design it isn't automated. This doesn't however, affect deposits.
As for your question regarding beta, we are taking our time to ensure everything is as perfect as it can be before we launch and we will announce this when the time is right; suffice to say we have some big plans for next year.

Thanks I appreciate all your help thus far

Okay it's done, withdrawals and deposits are opened up.
Can someone please make a small deposit/withdrawal and let me know. Just want to make sure, after all the forks, that everything is working 100%.

That wasn't me, we've had quite a few tickets generally for KHC.
As I said elsewhere in the thread I was trying to stay up for the .8 version but I fell asleep maybe 20 minutes before you released it heh.
I compiled from github a few minutes ago and the version is reporting  "version" : 30700,

Have you updated the source?