Search content
Sort by

Showing 15 of 15 results by Christopher761
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [OS] nvOC easy-to-use Linux Nvidia Mining v0019-1.4
by
Christopher761
on 05/01/2018, 23:12:21 UTC
For your information...

Thanks for the info.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [OS] nvOC easy-to-use Linux Nvidia Mining v0019-1.4
by
Christopher761
on 05/01/2018, 18:56:35 UTC
I have been wanting to give this a try.

If I can throw together a rig with 1060s on a biostar TB85, what version of NVOC should I use?

It is not clear whether the official version 19-1.4 or one of the community versions.

Any current recommendations on usb 3.0 flash drives?  I have a 64GB drive that runs hot.
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
Christopher761
on 22/12/2017, 03:16:11 UTC
@d0n4ald as to which coins to hold:  It's anybody's guess where each individual coin is going to go.  Some will sky rocket.  Some will dump.  Anyone that says they know for sure is lying.  Do what you feel is best.

But, having 20 different coins means that it is going to take 20x longer to get a payout to your wallet.  And it means you need 20x wallets.

Personally, I exchange everything to BTC, and then when I get a bunch, I send it to a wallet that I control.  Maybe not the right thing to do.  Bitcoin was at $20,000 a few days ago, and now down to $14,000.  Round and round she goes, where she goes, nobody knows.
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
Christopher761
on 20/12/2017, 23:49:01 UTC
Does zpool have problems transferring money to a bitpay bitcoin address?  Mine seems to be barfing, and the transaction has been pending for 24 hours.  Bitpay wallet seems to know the money is coming.  But it says, it was sent with minimal transaction fees, so the transaction might fail.

Also is there a way to increase the minimum payout on zpool?  It sent me .0023 on a Tuesday.    With a transaction fee of .0003....  (I just started that new address that morning, and was not expecting a payment for 6 more days.)

On MPH, I just set the automatic transfer off.  And then when it accumulates $80+ bucks, then I send it.  That way I am limiting the transfer fees compared to the transfer amounts.  I have not been able to see anyway to do that on zpool.

Not really an MPM problem, but given the way that MPM switches pools, I am hoping someone knows how to address these.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Is CPU to Pcie converter safe?
by
Christopher761
on 19/12/2017, 18:48:37 UTC
Just because it is an 8 pin connector on one side, does not mean it is for connecting to an 8 pin to CPU cable.  It could be.  Or it could be a PCIe power extension cable, which is could be 8 pins or 6 pins.  The 8 pin PCIe power cables are wired differently than the 8 pin CPU power cables.  Be very careful.

Based upon the OPs original post, it is not clear at all what he is working with.  Pictures of the cable and the 8 pin connector would help.  He said he ordered a PCIe Extension cable, but that he got a CPU extension cable with a y on it.  Never heard of CPU power extension cable with a Y output to 2x6 pin connectors.  That would seem to overload that line considerably.  I have seen 8 pin PCIe extension cables that Y out to 2 PCIe 6 pin cables.

Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
Christopher761
on 17/12/2017, 03:11:22 UTC
The miningpoolhub scams with the transaction fee size!
Its my monero withdrawal.
No explanations about huge tx fee from the support.

16976265   2017-12-16 06:30:03 (UTC)   TXFee      Confirmed   47VvBUVE...4NMg9kSa                                    n/a   0.01500000
16976264   2017-12-16 06:30:03 (UTC)   Debit_MP   Confirmed   47VvBUVE...4NMg9kSa   f272e14d...9adee17b   n/a   0.05746817

https://image.prntscr.com/image/b3X8ZIV_TeWxq8JmoARcWQ.png
oh f*ck. i dont check this. move hashrate to nanopool.

And from the Nanopool information

Pool settings
Pool settings

Fee is 1%
Payouts several times a day
Payout commission 0.015 XMR
Default minimum payout is 1 XMR
Share difficulty is static and equal to 120000.

https://xmr.nanopool.org/help
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
Christopher761
on 11/12/2017, 17:35:18 UTC
What I'm going to do now is to mine Monacoin here on MPH for three days, then on suprnova for 3 days and then I'll compare average hashrates and profits.

Bad approach. If you want to compare 2 pools, you have to mine in parallel. Otherwise, the results are not comparable as the net difficulty in 4-6 days can be completely different from days 1-3!

You are right, I have not considered difficulty  change.
I'll do next: I'll run two instances of ccminer with 2 GTX 1070 each: 1. MPH, 2. Suprnova
24 h should be enough to make conclusions.


Please keep us updated on your test
Thanks

Sure, I'm already running the test. I'll update you tomorrow.
It would be nice if someone else could also run a similar test just to get statistics. As admins mentioned earlier (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=472510.4840), this is a known issue, but some users do not experience it.
I'm using tpruvot ccminer 2.2 and 372.54 nvidia driver. I wonder if it can be miner/driver versions dependent.

I have tested suprnova it worked out immediately - online pool hashrate catched up the miner speed for 1min after launched!!! Then even surpassed a little and after that it went equal with the miner speed

I use ccminer-x64-2.2.3-cuda9 and NVIDIA driver version 23.21.13.8843 from 27/11/2017

Now there is new NVIDIA driver from 07/12/2017 but I can't decide do I want it or not, because finally I see what I should see.....


If it ain't broke....

Seriously, if you have a 100 card server farm, you should leave it alone for now.  And then on a separate test machine with one card in it, you can play around with bios mods, new drivers (or block chain drivers) etc.  When you get the test bench running the way you want it, and if there is a statistically significant gain, then start porting the changes to your the rest of your rigs.

Otherwise, sit back, and monitor it.  Things will change all on their own, and everything will start crashing, without you changing anything. 

I had a rig running equihash mining zec on nanopool.  Dialed in the afterburner settings.  Everything was fine.  Left town for a 5 day trip, and everything crashed on day one.

By the way, I hate the way Microsoft updates production machines while they are working.  Next, I hate that afterburner doesn't necessarily restart the fan settings.  Sigh...
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
Christopher761
on 10/12/2017, 21:24:21 UTC
https://imgur.com/a/EA3rP

Any idea why there's no reported hashrate in my hub worker's section ?

The part that says "no work" is the algorithm that you are choosing to utilize.

I am not sure if Multipool miner even uses that. 

Keeping in mind that the miner mines to the MultiPool Hub and to Zpool, I would check both of those to see if you are getting anything.  Under MultiPoolHub, you need to look at the individual coins to see what your received hashrate is.  So if the program is doing equihash, and you at getting BTG on the balances screen, I would look at the graph under BTG.
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
Christopher761
on 10/12/2017, 20:55:03 UTC
@aaronsace

FYI:

I downloaded the new master copy of the mining program from github. (https://github.com/aaronsace/MultiPoolMiner)  I wanted to see if the changes you talked about would make a difference in the calculations, because I was getting failure to connect to zpool API.

I put it on one box with the RX570 and let it run overnight, and the benchmarking was completed.  The numbers seem to be more accurate.  RX-570 at 600 H/s is calculating at 0.00011 BTC.  Based upon the reported hashrate, that looks good.  (I know I will need to update the bios to get more out of this card in terms of hash/second, but that was not the point of this post.)

I then tried to run the new master version on three Nvidia boxes.  All of them failed, because they got stuck on EthDcr64.exe failed to find libcurl.dll.  Comparing the bin directory from the old version to the new version, it appears that there is stuff missing on in the .\bin\ethhash-claymore directory.  I copied everything from my old version for that directory, and now all 4 boxes are humming along.

I can't comment on how accurate the nvidia calculations are yet, because those boxes are still benchmarking.  But, preliminarily, the numbers look more around what I would expect.  I will report back when it is done.
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
Christopher761
on 10/12/2017, 18:01:23 UTC
Is neoscrypt supposed to work with AMD using MultiPoolMiner?
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: Electroneum mining pool inconsistency?
by
Christopher761
on 09/12/2017, 20:34:27 UTC
Everyone look to be here etn.nanopool.org

I ve done the same, but 500 etn min paiement, (1000 by default)
and 6h pllns

84 mhs now

84.000 khs is not even 1mhs but still i switched to nanopool, hashrate will grow fast since all the other pools doesnt work properly

it is 85,000 KH/s which equals 85MH/s
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: NiceHash hacked?
by
Christopher761
on 09/12/2017, 18:06:09 UTC
The whole story smells.

An organization as big as Nicehash that was keeping all the hash-rate sellers payments in non-cold storage wallets? I don't believe they would/could have been so stupid. It's an exit scam IMHO. They kept raising the minimum payout so they could get that kind of ridiculously high amount that they owed sellers sitting in their hot wallets, waited until it was REALLY high, then they let someone "hack" them and shared the proceeds. That's my tinfoil hat theory, but I think it makes sense.

I think that the majority of their sellers were just people who were too lazy to work out what to mine for themselves, and/or didn't know enough to be able to, so they also don't understand how the explanation Nicehash is giving is pretty weak and lacks credibility. There are just SO MANY noob miners out there. Like I said - what kind of organization manages the huge amount of hash power they were working with, and the huge amounts of BTC they were supposed to be paying out - and doesn't use cold storage or multi-sig wallets for payments?

They were a huge honey trap. Maybe they didn't start out that way but it was probably just too much of a temptation for them. Obviously I don't know even a tiny amount of the facts but from where I stand I don't trust them and never will again. They were one of my 5th or 6th fallbacks and owed me maybe $60-$100 in BTC for small amounts of mining over the last few months, but I never used their wallets so if they had used a fair payment scheme I would have most of that BTC now, but oh well. Maybe if they pay me what they owe me I would recover some respect for them but as if that's going to happen.

Well  they were running  175 ph in  btc sha-256 alone.


that is  about 28 btc earned by hash sellers
and about      28 btc paid by hash renters

56 btc x 3% =    1.68 coins  a day income from sha-256  with on book hash

now they had say 30  al-gore-rhythms

so 1.68 x 30 = 50 coins a day income or  800,000   a day income



now  if  50 btc  coins a day was income  for them  x 33 =  btc 1650 coins  was renter and rentee money

since 4700 hundred coins were stolen  and it was about 3 or 4 days  worth stolen  the math is close .


So  is giving up 50 btc coins a day for year   worth 4700 coins in one shot?

And the company  said fuck it  lets grab and run.  last I heard they are sitting in a wallet.

What I don't understand is why all in one wallet.

and if I cracked a wallet with 4700 in coins.  I would first pull  say 100

they pull 4600.

they did 700
then 1000
then 1000
then 1000
then 1000.

all to one wallet.

So  that gives security more chances to  catch the thief and shut down wallet.

Smells inside  to me  but an IT  secondary employee makes more sense the the ceo.



The whole story stinks.  I have no idea if it was an insider or an outsider.

But based upon the above, if they could get the market share back, they could pay everyone back in 94 days.  Call it a year.  So maybe, they might come back.

Somehow, I think my .0109 BTC is gone.  Permanently.

I remember reading advice on this forum and others that say to keep your BTC offline.  If someone else controls the keys, it is their money.  Heck, even if you have it on your own personal PC it is at risk.

The only reason I had that much at Nicehash was because I sweep the account only when it makes sense compared to the transfer fees.  It does not make sense to transfer 0.001 BTC with a .0003 BTC fee.
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
Christopher761
on 07/12/2017, 15:27:43 UTC
@Aaronsace:

I have removed the pool nicehash from my startup scripts.  But one machine gives an error about Warning: Pool Api (Nicehash) has failed.

Is that for setting prices?

Is it something to worry about?
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
Christopher761
on 07/12/2017, 15:14:16 UTC
I've problem to connect to that pool using excavator miner. I'm not getting even message like "Connecting to 1.24..4:5 (google.com)". Hashrate equals 0: https://i.imgur.com/Pkjno8C.png

I've added worked (even two, normal and hub) in config and then set port to: hub.miningpoolhub.com:20593 for MonaCoin or hub.miningpoolhub.com:20507 for Vertcoin. Mining at others pools works perfectly with excavator.

@Atexor: I guess you haven't been reading any news.  But Nicehash was hacked.  All their BTC is gone.  I am not going to hold my breath about getting any of my money back either.

See the news statement at www.nicehash.com
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
Christopher761
on 03/12/2017, 21:51:58 UTC
New to MPH:

I am running what appears to be a very long benchmark.

Does the benchmark look for the best on a per card basis?  Or is it on a per machine basis (where each machine has multiple cards)?

The reason I ask, is I have 3x 1060GTX.   One is 6gb samsung and 2x are 3gb hynix.  I also have 1x1050 and a 1x950 and 2x570s and 4x 1070.  (the 1070s are 1x of one, 1x of another, and 2x of a third type)  I am just wondering how to arrange the machines the cards in machines.  Or does it matter?

Based upon the benchmark progress, it is creating some interesting numbers.