I don't think Vlad is deleting his posts. His false accusations of Coinbrief are still up...
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg10677066#msg10677066

BTW, CoinFire is offline.

With all due respect it doesn't matter if he was the tea boy or the janitor, that shit is going to stick.   Unfair I know but it will.

Yes, I posted a factual real NEWS link from CNN.

Please, I beg you, don't report me.

Bahahahaaaa.

The teen is an "intelligent kid," a man who hired him to write for a digital currency news website said Wednesday evening. Dustin O'Bryant, the editor of the website Coin Brief from Alabama, said: "He did not come across as radical in any way."

No, the ISIS guy was just the Editor.   haha!

Obviously you haven't graduated highschool.

Any and all articles are approved and reviewed by the editor.

The editor runs and directs the stories which are to be published.

What an idiot.  I hope there are smarter sock puppets than this here.

Sounds like a bad situation in all regards
Guess there are all types in the world kind of interesting that it was a chem paper

This thread is moving so fast and there is so much trolling and FUD that it's impossible to discern what's really going on.

Yesterday morning I saw a screenshot posted here where coinbrief said the emails they leaked were in fact faked.

Was that screenshot legit, were those leaked emails which dropped the price 2 nights ago to .0011, in fact fakes?

Cause now I'm seeing a 50,000 email dump?

WTF is going on?  Are these real or not and who has the most to gain if they're being faked?

If this is all FUD, it is the biggest most elaborate FUD I have ever seen.


Thanks for any clarification!  I hope Coinbrief posts to clarify once and for all or better yet, write another article to clarify or add some color.

Not only that, but the general consensus on HT is that the Coin Brief article was libelous and that you will soon be retracting your story.

Edit to add: I got ninja'd by Jimmothy. I was looking for that thread on HT, there are a bunch of idiots on there going on about how the article is false, even after PC fan admitted he was wrong and resigned from HT.

This is the thread on HT: https://hashtalk.org/topic/32996/coinbrief-article-update/100

Found another post I was thinking of:
http://i.imgur.com/soXdu65.jpg
https://hashtalk.org/topic/33111/what-exactly-is-going-on-can-someone-post-an-unbiased-account/11

Coinbrief never said the leaked emails were faked. You are probably referring to this post made by a user who is NOT Coinbrief:

http://i.imgur.com/MSh52NH.png

After this was posted the OP admitted he was an idiot and resigned from his position as paid mouthpiece. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg10647824#msg10647824

It's shocking to see the paid bashers here.

I mean, coinbrief comes out and says the leaked emails were faked and nothing, there is no positive response.

That's not possible.  There can't be that many blind haters on one board which means we have a lot of sock puppets here trying to keep the price down.

If the faked emails don't prove what I've been saying then nothing will.

These broad stroke are what nudge us toward polarization--I'm sure not every resident of the "Southern United States" are deliberately ignorant.  Come on, man.

oops...well, clearly not my fault, i posted very recently that I had 2 (almost 3) little monsters that consumed my oxygen and time....no, really ,my bad. no excuses.

i'm late to the party, was busy at HT and gethashing, but it hit 0.0011 in case you missed it
I think it was mostly the coinfire article (with info we already knew about ) and the lack of response. This thread has been good
https://hashtalk.org/topic/32948/gaw-needs-to-respond-to-this/3

Could this mean we're also getting closer to figuring out whether Joe Mordica is a zombie or not? 

I gotta disagree with this.

Why would someone sit on such important emails, if they are indeed legit?  It implies that they were either implicit in these alleged wrongdoings or they were hoping to get paid which means they are extortionists.

Or of course - the other possibility, the emails have been altered or totally faked.

There is no doubt XPY has been attacked by someone from day one.  Part of it might have been deserved but I've never seen such a concerted attack against a coin or a dev like what has happened against Garza and XPY.

There is more to all of this than meets the eye and the XPY volume and price proves [in part] this possibility.

So I at least entertain the possibility that someone has a lot to gain by seeing XPY fail.  If you eliminate any potential possibilities then you will run the chance that you will miss what's really happening.

Many did this with Bitcoin back in November 2013.

oh.. haha.

the date isn't important? at worst, "he" was sitting on emails for 2-3 months and just decided to release them. that seems mildly important from a context standpoint. "he" claimed "he" has someones lost ipad/iphone from Miami. That date's them back to mid/early January that "he's" had them. So, at best, he was sitting on them for a month+. Not important?  

Ran out of emails to leak? If they were legit (and I'm still on the fence on that), everything was from back in December/January right? Has he/she leaked anything more recent?

Although a likely futile attempt to get a straight answer, I suggest asking him one simple question:

Mr. Garza, in (250) words or less, please explain how you plain on defending your admitted involvement in what can be easily classified as a classic cryptocurrency pump-and-dump scheme in addition to other ongoing conduct relating to the mishandling of verifiable securities in violation of sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a), and 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. §§ 77e(a), 77e(c), 77q(a) & 77q(b)], Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)], and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5]?

Sum it up with, "Again, please stay on topic, keep it (250) words or less and be specific. Thank you."

Scott-