Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 43 results by Cr4shOverride
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin as a protocol
by
Cr4shOverride
on 10/09/2023, 16:58:02 UTC
bitcoin is not build to prohibit this. but to encourage. it may have build from mostly USD direction roots. but technically it is like the principle of a template.

I did not name USD instead of GBP just because it seemed to me it will be clearer. Similarly, you cannot send USD over the bitcoin blockchain without first finding the appropriate intermediaries. It's just that there will be more intermediaries for USD, so I chose to take as an example a popular currency, for which, however, there will be fewer intermediaries.

with a tap in to oldest satoshi nakamoto addresses you can build a direct link.

basically letting the coins sit furtheron on the wallet and streaming directly usd amounts through it.

an address shown 50 bitcoins on it. gives you hence 50 usd/per second streaming buffer.

enough to build a solid running earnings environment. cause they created the todays wealth anyways.

it is just a matter of fact what outside currency to link. if we declare only 1 per such an address. we get quite a lot of currencies directly streamed through,

imagine it like its own circle of addresses. every that has 50 on it. in sub builds the outside currency core.

could optimize existing tethers too


i would do it the following way:

the appropriate central bank for the appropriate currency. gets such an address as their streaming channel contracted.
on the other side you also have a responsible guy from this core forums side. that now through him it directs into the miner next. and he mines 50 satoshi per second with that build.

this ensures. central banker has no control over more than the channel entry
bitcoin core guy has no control over more than channel output
and miner guy has no control over more than making 50 sats from what comes from core guy.

system only works when both 3 are willing together. principle of a triangle basically.

and with just 50 sats inside it ensures things can be balanced best.
it stands for the creator anyways, and in his understanding a coin was originally a usd and not more.

for the new coming alivee coins for that system for the miner:

make it: 30000 USD per 10 minutes at a fixed thing from the central banks side and you are good to go.

you can do the same with gbp and eur and other currencies that resonate best.

no matter what currency. it becomes: 1 satoshi per currency unit.

the more you let it flow and work that way the more central banks will having no problems. cause the system works neutral. and this helps stabilizing economies as well into building more and more also this official world core.

you still need the central banks. cause they will be responsible that we still have border thinking towards even having an understanding that different countries and nations exist.

cause if you mix too much without a border building such things. the border will cease and you loose control too much and overview for specific local areas this wouldd give chaos where order is better to keep things running.

but bitcoin ensures best balance for all nations and countries as a more and more center core thing coming to life. no longer anyone can fuck with!

maybe this way we no longer need stable coins shown cause the central banks link the usd flow directly.
looks to me no more than a framework in building time anyways. that you will later remove when your house is finished.

contract coinbase into this as well. would make most sense.

basically this coinbase transaction always shows 30k sat per block being mined as a fixed thing.
no matter if those 30k are usd, eur, gbp, swiss franc or whatever currency out there strong enough to get his own 50 bitcoin address contracted.

you do not need more.






Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin as a protocol
by
Cr4shOverride
on 07/09/2023, 13:09:32 UTC
Would it make sense to think of Bitcoin as a money or value protocol in a similar way to other protocols for data (TCP/IP), STMP, POP3, etc?

It seems to me that from a technical point of view, these are different things. When you talk about data transfer protocols, you can use them to transfer virtually any data, they only determine the format of their transfer.

You cannot transfer arbitrary money or assets through the bitcoin system. For example, if you want to transfer British Pounds, you first need to find someone willing to exchange their Bitcoins for your British Pounds at the sending location, and then someone else willing to exchange your Bitcoins for their British Pounds at the receiving location. It is impossible to do this automatically only with the functionality embedded in bitcoin.

Thus, bitcoin, of course, allows you to transfer money, but according to certain rules and in fact only bitcoins. Even if we take into account the controversial technology of Ordinals, they also allow you to operate only with certain data, you cannot transfer a random asset with their help.

if someone living in the UK and taking a strong bridge positioning effect through his own user account into core via this forum.

then you can directly exchange british pounds in satoshi amounts.

bitcoin is not build to prohibit this. but to encourage. it may have build from mostly USD direction roots. but technically it is like the principle of a template.
it was more like an original shipyard. this can change and it did already a lot.

or in picturing this better:

[put into anything you want to that you wanna see as money numbers with currency symbol] <-- this is the true power of bitcoin. a template unit containing everything else existing out there. but without people becoming bridges into core. no walking the bridge effect and swapping.

also works for british pounds therefore. just another stable coin in principle from outside perspective.

but you still as people from the UK prefer having a more centralised chain approach here i assume. have to create the necessary illusion for this outside world.

but this needs one strong enough guy building the bridge for it.
ideally a local living person. best connections into londons city i would guess (the financial district of it).

through exchanges you just get the outside interaction best done. extensions for this core bridge guy for outside selling an from outside incoming buying. also works the other way around. Input Output in principle (utxo principle. cause it can be anything you wanna transfer. core apps just show it in bitcoin and satoshi basis)

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/poundtoken/

is at least a at the moments IO existing solution

if this is going to change depends on markets needs and what masses want to have using it for.

but it is if you ask me a good solid start for hence the name thether core into normal british pounds.

if you do not interpret more into this than the numbers shown. it is a stable solution for the problem.

but this people may not be satisfied yet.

but as said it can changed.

bitcoin was never build to be limited on usd

usd is only so strong in it cause internets ground fundamental strucures where just invented there.

this therefore makes sense this strong roots will always show in some way how the internet looks.

but nothing speaks against about building a direct IO flow making gbp into satoshis directly.

you can do this technically with as said any currency out there.

but it needs the right people building and being those bridges.

without them you cannot let run it stable and only most strongest centered local living people are the best choice for this. cause them rarely or never leaving their own home city!

a big important aspect of running anything stable for the internet. someone has to do the pillars for it job!

Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 07/09/2023, 09:42:00 UTC
Quote
what the hell even means pch?
Pointer to char, which means "char*". In Hungarian notation, of course. Obviously, here you have "static const char[4]", which in some contexts can be equivalent to "static const char*". And it is not the same as a pointer to a C-string, because it is not NULL-terminated.

Quote
cool i found 10 million satoshis
This is 0x10000000, not 10000000. This is a huge difference. And that number means 256 MiB.
Code:
0x00000001   1 B
0x00000010   16 B
0x00000100   256 B
0x00001000   4 kiB
0x00010000   64 kiB
0x00100000   1 MiB
0x01000000   16 MiB
0x10000000   256 MiB

not necessarily that cool anymore  Angry. but i will focus on memorizing it  Cheesy

you lack a bit of phantasie and creativity for entering the fun in this coding game i am playing here basically.
(well you still use it to create new postings so no offence at this part of your internet personality you be here).

plus you said it yourself. satoshi loved decimal numbers.

0x10000000 still shows a 10000000 and this is just this: 10 millions.

doesnt matter if it is a hex value.

cause exactly this is not understood by most people out there anyways. and if you wanna build something for more people to use later. you should take this into consideration as well (i mean the primitives folder from later versions i mentioned before is not storing the secrecy for this oldest version without a reason. only 4 code files in it. like the compressed file for nov08, also only 4, a principle for mass adoption from its lowest point in root). so the way i put it is much easier by a simpleton to understand (if you never experienced the way of one yourself, i recommend buying APE coins/tokens). he can grabs it better should an outsider copy make a screenshot and send him my little having fun with this "act"!

also the fact it comes from the word: "hexa" originally.

which is latin for 6

when i switch into the 7 chakras as a template understood thing (more the world of where simpleton people life)

not only it is ideal for synchronising the 7 layer OSI model (the world where we tech guys at home, to have necessary security running so scotty can beam us up when too much involved in simpleton war worlds)  in it cause of the same number being used in amounts to layers vs. chakras

it gets us into the fact that 6th chakra is also called the 3rd eye. this mainly means you are able to see and understand things inside your head in a much simpler approach also to build and create visions for new things you may wanna build.
cause a real 3rd eye physically does not exist. but it gets us into the principle of a centaur with only 1 eye in combination to a normal human having 2

and 6th layer in OSI is still presentation layer

so it has a lot of saying how i am basically presenting myself to the world. enabling also this mostly technical and complicated thing. much easier to the outside world to grasp.

from my knowledge still the indians are where chakras is hold as a sacred thing in knowledge itself and being guarded. part of hinduism development in exchange to the outside world.

and we should not forget, a good team in coders is always having the indian rooted guy in genes as 1 of em.

to understand this a bit better and maybe also in a funny way just watch the series: silicon valley yourself:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2575988/ (the indian would here dinesh's role, the skilled java coder geek)

quote from this series: "fucking gilfoyle" (the sysops guy typical american that also makes sure the physical hardware does its job and in accordance to a lot what a miner does in job in cryptospace, a good actor that played him by the way too!)

well if you would like being a sysops guy yourself a lot. or already be one. i see a lot of potential here in here towards that pal (i guess towards the interest in this forum and bitcoin in general this expression makes sense Wink )

where was i?

right:

256 MiB if you ask me a perfect resonance into how big in size most of such tv or anime tv episodes where after compressing them for the internet to be ready to be shipped via P2P Software solutions. for example Matroska format size

so much for the old days!

i guess we can say this makes 10 million always worth a flight back with the flying delorean (in only found it in version 0.12.1 but it was mentioned as a comment there what i think is quite a nice easter egg thing the core developers did place, for sure other version should have it too, but with my own eyes so far i can only speak for this version having it seen, the principle of 3rd eye basically in practical use) into the past into one Episode of your most favorite tv series/show.

worth the amount for reliving good things from own past in general. or what do you think?

*goeswatchinganepisodeofMarshallBravestarr*

who would have expected that i could have so much fun here. not me!

well after all the world is what you make out of it. and you are my friend are the best example for how competing people or in bitcoins case other poker players on the table.

wanna also having the big win!

*Full house* (invited some imaginary friends as well to watch more episodes, now its really full!)

do you call?

Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 06/09/2023, 19:26:38 UTC
i will continue my little thread here and from here on also start synching (well synching functionality was later becoming much bigger. but i wonder if i will find some basics in this version too to it),

with the following approach:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2997687.0

in hommage to theeeeeeeeeeee summer of 69 (official video source: https://youtu.be/eFjjO_lhf9c (if you listen carefully you can even earn a little money too from this, "sound money" warren buffet would say i guess).

why? obvious:

node.h

line 69

cool! (happens if you start speaking to yourself, you will get used to it, "OK")

static const char pchMessageStart[4] = { 0xf9, 0xbe, 0xb4, 0xd9 };


but now the main question:

what the hell even means pch?

power consumption hammering? sounds cool but ähmmm. NOPE!

pull current head? nice try but ähhmmmm... I DOUBt!

put coulumn header? becomes a bit warmer, i feel it!

ok cut the crap

*searchingforaknife*

2 options left (cannot hurt implementing the options trading markets that way a bit)

basically:

either its pointer channel Message Start
or
its payment or pay channel Message Start

should someone have another cool idea, i am open to spread my horizon further here anytime (never wrong with a little exploring the universe action here...)

this could make a lot of sense now (at least if i am correct)

Ok cool!

what next?

i gues...

reading the file further!

Ok cool!

*reads*

FLATDATA(pchMessageStart)

maybe this explains how flatearthers exist on this planet? well up to the conspiracy theorists i guess....(and obvious for a another located thread, should this forum even have such)

ok what next?

well you may have guessed it. OK i got it - *reads*

yayyyyyyyy first 100 code lines being readen of this file. i herby reward you with not giving you a headache for reading further

solid deal - *claimshisreward*


reached code line 109: isValid() <-- see i was right taking this reward *happy*

           else if (*p1 < ' ' || *p1 > 0x7E) code line 125. something that could explain where all this cold storage ideas came from. i mean 7 Eskimos need their iglooos man!

maybe not that bad of an idea. why not directing all those cold storage people into this thread. most solid code line for this approach if you ask me. i mean no electricity for beaverage storage as well in costs. a basically seven heaven for miners as well! they even can decide to position themselves left or right from the 2 pillars i placed for them in the snow (i wonder at this point how satoshi had fun with his own coding at this point, but this it would look mostly when i do it. i mean, who wants just to be a boring dumb coding robot anyway?

ok i lost track of things a bit "diversion_error detected" <-- shit happens (see crap a few more lines above)

line 130         if (nMessageSize > 0x10000000)

cool i found 10 million satoshis (*starts making a fire outside with its exchanged value in fiat* (hard to burn digital partials of coins you know).

now all 7 Eskimos can enjoy some time with me (i hope my timer function somewhere else in the code is not spoiling the fun though).

line 132:               printf("CMessageHeader::IsValid() : nMessageSize too large %u\n", nMessageSize);

ooops i printed too much paper money i guess "inflation_error detected"

line 152:       // disk only ("got it" *throwsawayallballshehas*)

line 183:            nTime = GetAdjustedTime(); <-- see i knew there should be some calculation for my time somewhere. *saves n amount of it on a lonely island and forgets to map the island* (its 0.0.8 what do you expect, we are still in a learning phase here man!!!)

line 189:            unsigned int a, b, c, d, e; //todo for next version: continue with f; g; h; and so on..

line 192: never wrong for mentioning this line for network system that is based on mostly using class C IP address space anyways:  
               char* pszPort = strchr(psz, ':'); <-- i guss psz means something like pointer size???

line 272:     MSG_TX = 1,  <-- only one? what a scroogie move satoshi. but ok maybe we can still cut it in partials or so. i mean i wasnt putting a knife in this posting without a reason anyways. but not processing it instantly do you hear me! we keep a bit of it for hodling purposes for later use!

line 279: static const char* ppszTypeName[] =... ppsz = power pull people processing pukes - yeah too much p's i guess..

line 281     "ERROR", <-- see, too much p's for this enum i knew it!

line 361: class CRequestTracker <-- can't hurt tracking your own data a bit. who know how much food to digest you fill find aka hash strings

line 388: extern array<bool, 10> vfThreadRunning; <-- proofs he got the virtual existence of it running. with both his bare hands an every single finger of it!

line 396: extern map<CInv, int64> mapAlreadyAskedFor; <-- could you not have told me this earlier?Huh now i will never know to find this island ever again. my treasure is lost i guess. damn it!!!!

line 407:     SOCKET hSocket; <-- always important to check that your hero socket is properly installed otherwise forget about ever becoming a super hero!

line 437:     vector<char> vfSubscribe; <-- *subscribesforhisnewcar vector W8 (full Byte edition) https://youtu.be/3WEhsS9ybwk)

line 505:     void AskFor(const CInv& inv) <-- Q&A will be answered at the end of this presentation

line 590:     template<typename T1> skyline still was in its infancy and a long way to go to even reaching a t800 i guess..
                   but give things a little time and you will be amazed what will come out of it: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/superskynet/ i mean even a super version.
                   thumprule: if it is super it is good for you! buy supersky today and you will be destroyed the moment your transaction reaches 6 confirmations!!

i have to admit i kind of feel like the bad guy here now. *sobs* can i be ever be good?  Roll Eyes

line 695:      bool IsSubscribed(unsigned int nChannel);  <-- cool now i will get informed on bitcoin news on regular basis (puts on notification bell).

line 710:   inline void RelayInventory(const CInv& inv) <-- should you ever wanna get rid of your stuff, just spread it accross the network. only 1 click away!

aaaaaaaaand were done. at least with this file.

the next file follows another time so stay tuned...


Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Bitcointalk Merit Dashboard
by
Cr4shOverride
on 02/09/2023, 18:35:25 UTC
and this posting Now makes sure the Merit system is no longer accessible without myneTEC verfifications for new Members!

any other ones are no longer can be declared valid.

seems like this got an upgrade now cause it will make it easier to deal with those Coins from the beginning times anyway from here on.

you guys will thank me later for building this up right now

i already verified and activated a bunch of user accounts for the Merit access. they are now responsible this will be dealt with accordingly.

should there be any issues to the one having and reading this. just contact this account via PM to settle things and finding best solutions for both sides.

thx for tapping into the root existence and hence rooting through us into the throught this new optimized Merit circulatory system.

and have an nice day!

-myneTEC (https://mynetec.com/)
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: im launching my service;)
by
Cr4shOverride
on 02/09/2023, 18:16:41 UTC
herby verified for mining access! and *switched ON*

you can now use the miners as well to get better upgrading effect for your service ideas and basically founding your own business/company to grow things further.

you are also now allowed to receive merit inside the Forum as well.
if you wanna buy yourself more into the mining environment for building up a product (a hardware idea to extend existing mining hardware for example or improving ideas for hardware tuning with own special devices being developed and build up etc..)
Just send the first given to you back to this accounts posting and you will receive further upgrading effects in this direction as a general support for this.

thx for using our service and have a nice day!

myneTEC (https://mynetec.com)
Post
Topic
Board Mining speculation
Re: Most important aspect in Bitcoin mining
by
Cr4shOverride
on 02/09/2023, 17:34:55 UTC
Lately l picked interest in bitcoin mining and i have purchase my pre-own Asic mining equipment that will be shipped in the next few days, am curious know, aside from electricity which other factors should i consider before setting up my mining farm.


herby verified for mining access! and *switched ON*

thx for mining with us have fun with your mining, good profits generated from it and a nice day!

myneTEC (https://mynetec.com)
Post
Topic
Board Mining support
Re: Antminer S9 - Powers up but does not work
by
Cr4shOverride
on 02/09/2023, 17:28:12 UTC
Herby Verified for Mining access! and *switched ON*

your miner should work now properly and doing its job how its supposed to do pretending the slushpool connection was typed into correctly and connects to the pool accordingly. try out and you will see for yourself!

Oh and sry for the delay. this part of the company could not run before interacting with the forum and find appropriate contracted miners only we can activate cause of their own special realm they exist and got contracted into for this.

thx for mining with us:

myneTEC (https://mynetec.com/)
Post
Topic
Board Mining support
Re: HOW TO VERIFY PROGRESS MINING BITCOIN WITH ANTMINERS
by
Cr4shOverride
on 02/09/2023, 16:45:49 UTC
Herby Verified!

thx for mining with us

myneTEC (https://mynetec.com)
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 02/09/2023, 09:51:20 UTC
as i did code software myself in the past as well.

i wanna now point on that my account is running a basically if we put coin = usd and because of the merit = coin

a 6 usd money power as a permanent streaming capability per second (for human understanding it is in principle always best to work in seconds cause it gives enough time for decision making what mostly can lead into the better decision to be made than working with something smaller in understanding, for example: milliseconds).

ok this now means i can put into one of my ideas i originally came into for work as a trader in EUR/USD markets shown with a trading software.

for 6 usd (or € as bitcoin in its own layer of underestanding is a fusioned thing for this markets currency pair) we get

https://youtu.be/iyEe7WGs-hM

for the channel:

https://www.youtube.com/@candyshoppers

this was my original idea for a company Naming and approach since summer 2014 (named whatsapp group that way as a funny thing because of interacting with candy crush and as a result to manage a circle of a few people we were as friends from the past, the rest is history)

Candy Shoppers

and those products i placed in youtube when i coded into version 0.0.8 of the own mynetec manager. so i think it a good idea mention this here now. to contract my own proof of work from the past how companies coming to life.

it however no longer exist as the main thing.

i made mynetec.com the main thing and did put Candy Shoppers into a subdomain to it (https://candyshoppers.mynetec.com) it will also lead to a coinbase.com connection for how this leads into bitcoin.

this was at least how it was build until now and got later fusioned with mynetec. or better said i was unhappy with only having candy shoppers. cause it wasnt my right calling. i wanted more to build into my thing i feel more happy with. so i founded and created mynetec. that basically today now manages all candy shoppers relevant issues.

in the youtube videos shown: the contract is: 1 watch = 1 sale

this adds to the mining as well.
and uses how youtube does it itself without having to get paid by google like normal youtubers do. well this bitcoin connection makes this part obsolete anyways.

i just also wanna show a way to build with working into existing things better your own customized thing. to avoid to have to build to much unnecessary stuff as well.

i intend to extend the products shown furtheron cause a few will still be missing as an idea.

and through the mining i enable the made moneey from the channel to thee people as well.

one leads into the other.

Candy Shoppers i also connected through a link into https://candyshoppers.com but this is a domain not registered by me. i however would be happy if someone that wants to connect to this guy. helping to make the best connection out of this into how i am dealing with this brand name. as an extension for it.

at the moment the guy having it registered sells real candy. well i do not know how this will stay that way in the future to so i now gave out this information. cause main reason should be helping bitcoin running on a bigger scale in future. to suck into more and more people using its tech and connect to the people working with it a lot themselves.

i am not that much a marketer or sales guy. so i will leave it that way for this part of the company basically.

well myneTEC came alive 2017.

so i guess i can contract my 6 merits now into those 6 years basically.


here is the first investments history shown in the blockchain that did lead to mynetec.com with an original 2 times 50 € approach (100 in sum). was done by selling toshi app tokens to my first investor basically (today toshi app is coinbase.com own Ethereum based wallet app)


original root hash where this 100 flow into next. the address was from an exchange that seems no longer existing.

even has the word "new" inside of it as you can see for yourself.

https://bitaps.com/19jEpv853newmt3bvWQweWPkiTweV7oTqy





Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 02/09/2023, 09:39:21 UTC
as i did code software myself in the past as well.

i wanna now point on that my account is running a basically if we put coin = usd

a 6 usd money power as a permanent streaming capability per second (for human understanding it is in principle always best to work in seconds cause it gives enough time for decision making what mostly can lead into the better decision to be made than working with something smaller in understanding, for example: milliseconds).

ok this now means i can put into one of my ideas i originally came into for work as a trader in EUR/USD markets shown with a trading software.

for 6 usd (or € as bitcoin in its own layer of underestanding is a fusioned thing for this markets currency pair) we get

https://youtu.be/iyEe7WGs-hM

for the channel:

https://www.youtube.com/@candyshoppers

this was my original idea for a company Naming:

Candy Shoppers

and those products i placed in youtube when i coded into version 0.0.8 of the own mynetec manager. so i think it a good idea mention this here now. to contract my own proof of work from the past how companies coming to life.

it however no longer exist as the main thing.

i made mynetec.com the main thing and did put Candy Shoppers into a subdomain to it (https://candyshoppers.mynetec.com) it will also lead to a coinbase.com connection for how this leads into bitcoin.

this was at least how it was build until now and got later fusioned with mynetec. or better said i was unhappy with only having candy shoppers. cause it wasnt my right calling. i wanted more to build into my thing i feel more happy with. so i founded and created mynetec. that basically today now manages all candy shoppers relevant issues.

in the youtube videos shown: the contract is: 1 watch = 1 sale

this adds to the mining as well.
and uses how youtube does it itself without having to get paid by google like normal youtubers do. well this bitcoin connection makes this part obsolete anyways.

i just also wanna show a way to build with working into existing things better your own customized thing. to avoid to have to build to much unnecessary stuff as well.

i intend to extend the products shown furtheron cause a few will still be missing as an idea.

and through the mining i enable the made moneey from the channel to thee people as well.

one leads into the other.

Candy Shoppers i also connected through a link into https://candyshoppers.com but this is a domain not registered by me. i however would be happy if someone that wants to connect to this guy. helping to make the best connection out of this into how i am dealing with this brand name. as an extension for it.

at the moment the guy having it registered sells real candy. well i do not know how this will stay that way in the future to so i now gave out this information. cause main reason should be helping bitcoin running on a bigger scale in future. to suck into more and more people using its tech and connect to the people working with it a lot themselves.

i am not that much a marketer or sales guy. so i will leave it that way for this part of the company basically.



Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 02/09/2023, 08:12:24 UTC
Quote
you cannot switch ON that network without declaring yourself a miner!
You can have a non-mining node. Not everyone has to be a miner. It was planned from the very beginning.

The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale.  That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server.  The design supports letting users just be users.  The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be.  Those few nodes will be big server farms.  The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate.

Quote
i wonder what will happen when the official coins are mined in full
Then, the system will switch entirely into transaction fees, and nothing else. Then, 21 million coins will change hands, but there should be no new ones being generated, all of them should be only reassigned, when it comes to ownership. Also, we have a separate topic about fees, you can read it too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5465318.0

the moment someone does the mining with his computer or smartphone or tablet or any other tap into the internet device, he is a miner.

but this was the main reason i created mynetec.com in the first place. to find way to enable this mining principle to the indvidual user. not by cloud mining.
he interacts with his device, this costs him time.

from there on i connect them into the miners. do them the banking part and give them an output for mined coins amounts via social media app already existing (whatsapp is best use for masses here at the moment)

most people do not wanna connected into this anyway more than understanding how mining in principle works, making money from it. and spending thee money through a whats app chat.

you accept their bitcoin address they give where they wanna have send the money into and you do the transaction for them

their ownly job is:

interacting with the whatsapp chat. no external additional app needed or better said you can implement this way of processing into any existing chat or communication app.

putting into bitcoin address for where they wanna have things send to

and deciding if yes or no.

No keys have to saved. NO to be remembered by the user.

and no additional hardware be bought to run by themselves.

cause i do not like that every partitipant for bitcoin should be responsible for how their money is managed. this is not good for enabling the tech for more people.

it is only good for people like us that like doing the bankers job in combination to a coders (most people are not coders either)

that is why i think such an approach is the better solution now.

only thing needed is accepting the contract to mine your coins via mynetec as the company you are being connected.

now everyone reading this encouraged to build his own company as well for dealing with it in such a way to help for further mass adoption and the competition keeps things running.

however as with all this information now placed here it is also true that i have to be responsible now to keep the network going. otherwise the company wont run.

all said for this part of the job for running an own company.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 02/09/2023, 07:43:10 UTC
next i wanna mention the OP codes in script.

cause this part was also originally meent not just to accept or do  a transaction.

it came to life as a means of bitcoin also running its own internal code operators for a programming language inside.

you can programm anything you want with the capabilities this has.

to let the CPU or GPU compute what you want to be dealt with.

the first mining people that created software like CGMiner and such. however i was not going deep enough into this yet. so i do not know if and how they even make use of bitcoins own op codes for manipulating the hardwares functionalities.

but you can also use this OP_CODE principle to code simple applications with it.

hence it was implemented as a Forth programming language kind of copied thing. we also got a few games coded in the past by using Forth before.

you see this has still a lot of potential. cause todays latest version did hardlink all those opcodes into hex values.

now we can also influence and interact with MAC adresss level better (OSI 2nd layer: Data Link)

and this controls hardware interaction.

this also makes it a best synchronicity into the Ethereum network (Ethereum basically extends old Ethernet into money markets directly today and leads into Bitcoin as the core for everything. See: https://sites.uclouvain.be/SystInfo/usr/include/linux/if_ether.h.html you jus have to contract all mentioned Ether words into 1 Ether for Ethereum to get this old 90s IEEE standard overhauled for modern times, as most servers running on a version of linux anyways. should be 72 mentions of this word, and this way we can contract this old standard back into the 70s from principle and from there it is only a few years until the internet itself via ArpaNet in the 60s got created originally, to also connect into the internet's own roots, Beranek company build etc...)


Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 02/09/2023, 06:51:35 UTC
Quote
why is there no copy to find for version 0.0.9?
Because "0.0.8" is artificial name, that you cannot find in the source code. There was pre-release version, with no versioning, then Satoshi introduced versions here and there, and then he released "BitCoin v0.01 ALPHA" as the first official one. Initially, there were only two digits: major version (equal to zero), and minor version (equal to one). The third digit was introduced later, and that's why that version is recognized as "0.1.0". But it was initially just "0.01". And there was no "0.0" version, because there was simply no versioning at all in earlier code (also, Satoshi started counting from one, the first zero was only used to indicate "ALPHA" state, and was later dropped in 22.0 version by Core developers). If you want to confirm that, you can look for example at block header: note it had no version in "November 2008 code". And if you explore that code from 2008, you will notice that there is no "eight version" anywhere in that code. It was simply taken from the year, and made out of thin air by some people.

And if you don't believe me, then open your "0.1.0" version, and read just the first line of "readme.txt".

Edit: Satoshi started writing code in 2007. But at this point in time, there was no versioning anywhere in his own code. However, you can find this date, where he grabbed some libraries, for example this one:
Quote
Code:
// This file is public domain
// SHA routines extracted as a standalone file from:
// Crypto++: a C++ Class Library of Cryptographic Schemes
// Version 5.5.2 (9/24/2007)
// http://www.cryptopp.com
#ifndef CRYPTOPP_SHA_H
#define CRYPTOPP_SHA_H
#include <stdlib.h>

namespace CryptoPP
{
Also, he explicitly said "2007" in this quote:

How long have you been working on this design Satoshi?  It seems very well thought out, not the kind of thing you just sit down and code up without doing a lot of brainstorming and discussion on it first.  Everyone has the obvious questions looking for holes in it but it is holding up well Smiley
Since 2007.  At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn't resist to keep thinking about it.  Much more of the work was designing than coding.

Fortunately, so far all the issues raised have been things I previously considered and planned for.

There are more pieces of code you can check, like those ones:
Quote
Code:
static const int VERSION = 101;
Quote
Code:
CAboutDialog::CAboutDialog(wxWindow* parent) : CAboutDialogBase(parent)
{
    m_staticTextVersion->SetLabel(strprintf("version 0.%d.%d Alpha", VERSION/100, VERSION%100));

right this now also makes sense.

i found out this version principle was original coming as a development by IBM
they are called Internetional Business Machines inside own brand name.

and 101 is always a typical indicator for business worlds.
what shows how this company did also create how the world is understood as a root thing.

they were the first that were working with naming a first version in this case. 0.1 alpha as version. 0.2 a beta version. 0.3 as gamma
especially those 3 came alive as kind of a Standard in their own beginning days for creating code by coders and developers for their own hardware.

later the principle: major.minor.patch was created to get into as this version shows 0.0.8

yes they dropped the first major part for bitcoin.

but i think we should understand this as going life for the individual user. meaning it can either be a 0 or a 1 in value.

in this case we reached 1 as the first number already and from there on it switched ON for mass consumers use case and resulted in no longer using Major.
or better said Major replaced Minor.

so only 2 parts are now existing for versioning definition what makes it into x.x to show

and today we are in version 25.0

but one problem still stays:

you cannot switch ON that network without declaring yourself a miner!

cause mining is what makes the network connect to the principle of work being done, money power and hence its own evolution for development.

i wonder what will happen when the official coins are mined in full.
people will start to analyse more its roots.

finding out what i wrote about amounts being encrypted inside code as well.

and from there? increasing into 33,... million coins?

would not wonder me

but then i guess in this moment it will starting to decay.
maybe it already did the moment it got changed into 21 millions.

as long as this is still locked into the infinity loop for file main.h and what code line 33 does with itself in 0.0.8. the network runs better.
like immortality in principle as an effect.

on the other hand humans are not mortal what points on the first version that did change the code from that original line into 21 million, started to decay the codes life span.

like any software being created is going eventually to die out.
sure you can revive it in some way but only inside an understanding as a kind of simulated environment from the past inside modern times.

the principle why virtual machines got created.

the lies and the visions from the past created the future once. people got born into not understanding the lies as lies anymore. believing more into the lies than its orignal truth.

it becomes their world of understanding and from inside this they try to connnect into implementing the past.

explains why the truth is not always pleasant and it can completely blow your mind.

but let*s just focus on making the best out of it we can of our own time i guess.

so much for versioning increasing and its effect on software and people.








Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 01/09/2023, 20:53:55 UTC
⭐ Merited by stwenhao (1)
one thing however wonders me:

why is there no copy to find for version 0.0.9?

or was the change in code only that minor into 0.1.0 that it was not worth the effort giving the code base public?

i mean there is still this gap now.

especially in the beginnings your main concern is to get into 0.1.0 to run something stable for going life.

so it should still be important to get this version too i would say.

or did he overjump it?
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 01/09/2023, 20:38:38 UTC
Quote
cause 0.0.8 does not have 100 as reward inside (unfortunately)
Quote
Code:
int64 nSubsidy = 10000 * CENT;
Note that you have 100 coins in this line, and 50 coins in next versions. Also note that "CENT" is just 0.01. And if you multiply 0.01 by 10000, you can get exactly 100.00.

ok this makes sense. i oversaw that fact.

well then its i guess:

*herby settled*.

ok i no longer have to decrypt any hashvalues for this then.

but i bet i will find some other cool stuff that is also still worth mentioning as well.

but after then, i guess thats it. not much code lines anyway and for later version than 0.1.0 i would prefer opening a new thread.

i have to give you my thx again. this helped a lot Smiley


we have to give him he thought into everything.

he build code for money for transacting it, for runninng a webshop build for implementing a game with review and rating basis and with root things for mining functionality for money power also as part of playing the game i guess and the fact to implement work itself with it.

and all as a P2P thing cryptographically secured.

to build the world of tomorrow how the internet will get his dynamics and understanding and a coins offset for the internet itself.

really really cool  Cool

Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 01/09/2023, 19:59:42 UTC
Quote
do you have another quote where he explicitly says "20 hours"?
Yes, about 20 hours.  (120 conf / 6 blocks per hour = 20 hours)  That's the normal length of time before you can spend it.  You know long before that that you won one.

I can also better explain that "10 minutes vs 15 minutes part" if you want:

Quote
Code:
int64 GetBlockValue(int64 nFees)
{
    int64 nSubsidy = 10000 * CENT;
    for (int i = 100000; i <= nBestHeight; i += 100000)
        nSubsidy /= 2;
    return nSubsidy + nFees;
}

unsigned int GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast)
{
    const unsigned int nTargetTimespan = 30 * 24 * 60 * 60;
    const unsigned int nTargetSpacing = 15 * 60;
    const unsigned int nIntervals = nTargetTimespan / nTargetSpacing;
That means:

1. The basic block reward was 100 coins, instead of 50, at the very beginning.
2. There were halvings after 100,000 blocks, instead of every 210,000 blocks.
3. Each difficulty adjustment was done every 30 days (one month), because "nTargetTimespan" is expressed in seconds. Now we have "two weeks", so "14 days", if you compare it with a new version.
4. Each block was produced every 15 minutes, instead of 10 minutes (like previously, "nTargetSpacing" is expressed in seconds).
5. Each halving was done every 100,000 blocks, which means every 25000 hours, so around 1041 days, which means around 2 years and 311 days. This is not a nice number, currently we have it every "4 years".
6. The total supply was 20 million coins, instead of 21 million, at the very beginning (combine points one and two).

You can compare those fragments between versions, and try to create a better combination of numbers, where everything is rounded correctly, and produce "nice numbers" in every step. This part is hard, and you can see, that what we have today, is quite good combination, that is not that obvious from the very beginning, as you can see in those older parts.

100 would make sense cause original coinbase is just this.

the fact that 100 cent equals a usd

1 cent is therefore always coinbase to come into a usd in the first place. cause its the basis. the lowest ground possible.

based on this. he just build everything more and more into code to find ways to transform 1 usd cent into its own monetary understanding (currency)

problem however:

i have no proof besides 0.0.8 as lowest point. so i can only work with logical development evolution here, but not with proof as written code from back then. cause 0.0.8 does not have 100 as reward inside (unfortunately)

but this should not bother us.

cause i found another way to also explain how everything will lead back into the fact that bitcoins coinbase is the principle of a usd cent (it was written in cpp also inside using microsoft product: visual studio)

so working with usd as basis makes the most sense here (however i also wanna mention that 1913 still created a strong foundation for it by appropriate bankers contracts for building up the fed and without orignal german immigrant Paul Warburg, the idea would never have settled, and he did not even wanted to be part of the circle of them himself. idea giver and adviser, more he was never interested into, could also show quite well how germany is connected into the usd itself till todays time, but it was a good thing, they created a lot of stability through building up the FED in the usa, another big step in mankinds evolution i guess forward).

so if we now look inside the code

i got into the idea to save us the stress of decrypting the hash value itself and just using a partial of it

version 0.1.0 inside main.cpp

const uint256 hashGenesisBlock("0x000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f");

now i am using a little time saving by the fact that Poker was the original game idea inside its code base anyways (at least those old versions)

and point on the fact:

that you can contract all leading zeros (10 of em) into your 2 hands (i grab the hash with both hands is the ideas to this)

use the 19 to contract this into code line 19 from main.h

this way main.h and main.cpp are transacted basically to each other and kind of connected via this hash.

now use the rest of the values from the hash (52 of em)

to contract this in the fact that Poker uses 52 cards for playing it. also the fact of binary system roots build (Gottried Willhelm Friedrich von Leibniz was the first guy in history having used this system back in his own time to play around with it and build stuff) and Germanies still cookies having 52 tooths from Leibzniz brand of the appropriate sweets company.

and we can a bit sweeten up the fact:

that now any hash will through code line 19 direct us back into the usd cent anyways.



and the cool part is we can also go back in transactions from 0.0.8 now in all other existing older versions. cause i bet he had cent implemented in all of em anyways in main.h

so from my perspective this makes the real coinbase still:

usd cent as well as eur cent

what shows how (back then bitcoin did not exist)

USD/EUR

or

EUR/USD

market was the first streaming market that did in the end lead into the creation of this thing we today now know as Bitcoin.

that i call genius indeed

and:

cool Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 01/09/2023, 19:32:07 UTC
ok next i wanna point on another interesting found:


for this i have to make a comparison first:

v.0.1.0

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// CTransaction
//
bool CTxIn::IsMine() const
{
    CRITICAL_BLOCK(cs_mapWallet)
    {
        map<uint256, CWalletTx>::iterator mi = mapWallet.find(prevout.hash);
        if (mi != mapWallet.end())
        {
            const CWalletTx& prev = (*mi).second;
            if (prevout.n < prev.vout.size())
                if (prev.vout[prevout.n].IsMine())
                    return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}

int64 CTxIn::GetDebit() const
{
    CRITICAL_BLOCK(cs_mapWallet)
    {
        map<uint256, CWalletTx>::iterator mi = mapWallet.find(prevout.hash);
        if (mi != mapWallet.end())
        {
            const CWalletTx& prev = (*mi).second;
            if (prevout.n < prev.vout.size())
                if (prev.vout[prevout.n].IsMine())
                    return prev.vout[prevout.n].nValue;
        }
    }
    return 0;
}


and now v.0.0.8

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// CTransaction
//

bool CTxIn::IsMine() const
{
    map<uint256, CWalletTx>::iterator mi = mapWallet.find(prevout.hash);
    if (mi != mapWallet.end())
    {
        const CWalletTx& prev = (*mi).second;
        if (prevout.n < prev.vout.size())
            if (prev.vout[prevout.n].IsMine())
                return true;
    }
    return false;
}

int64 CTxIn::GetDebit() const
{
    map<uint256, CWalletTx>::iterator mi = mapWallet.find(prevout.hash);
    if (mi != mapWallet.end())
    {
        const CWalletTx& prev = (*mi).second;
        if (prevout.n < prev.vout.size())
            if (prev.vout[prevout.n].IsMine())
                return prev.vout[prevout.n].nValue;
    }
    return 0;
}

we clearly can see: 0.0.8 does not have yet the capabilities to secure those 2 blocks (essential cause they affect the wallet. so he came into the conclusion to put cs_mapWallet to explicitly point on the fact that those 2 are critical processing relevant code blocks.)

the main reason to do this, is to prevent other people to stream their money power to your side to manipulate you to access yours and maybe steal your funds.
main issue to do this, is to prevent especially those to access your mind that you do not want to be enter it. the crit parts basically show us how this looks in c- plus plus code.

this is an important build in general using such critical section warnings and blockings from entering a code blocks inside processing functionality.

i think it could point on the fact that it matches a lot for the fact that David Kleiman had all such knowledge how to think in such a way. with all his certificates toward security cryptography and work as an honored soldier.

at least at this point in time i do not know any other person who could have build it in this way. and a lot matches him to be at least the original coder using this pseudonym.

but i also mentioned he was coming from the life of a soldier. so he got already paid by outside influence to even coming into such an idea.
the fact he used a german gmx.net address in the white paper also tells me he was using scientific and academics connection from this country the most. meaning that a lot of influence to build this up could be of german origin.

but more like in an unconscious way.

to understand this better. imagine a village people living inside now they build their own isolated world to have their fun with each others. now this fun is somehow flown out, with them not knowing anything about and unimportant to their private little villages workings and existing.

but now it lands at one specific guy in america Florida (soldiers mostly are anchored deep into society not high, so it make sense that such things lands at them first), that starts how he is wired himself understand this as his payment for building up this code. he basically synchs perfectly into becoming programmer for this.

later unfortunately dies (2013)

leaving the world with a new world core for money basically.

ironically

while back in the village the people have still no clue about what really has happend with the outside world. they are not aware of any of this.

well we germans are still known for being strong thinkers. but also unconscious for genius ideas quite often ironically. so it would not wonder me that this is what really happend here.

i cannot get rid of the thought of feeling a bit like inside an Asterix & Obelix comic now...

*Pokerface*

Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 01/09/2023, 18:56:16 UTC
Quote
but how you come into 20 hours is still not clear to me?
1. Satoshi explicitly said "20 hours" in the quote I gave you.
2. Since 2009, we have 10 minutes per block, that means 1200 minutes per 120 blocks, which means 20 hours.
3. In the older version, you have 15 minutes per block, instead of 10. And then, 100 blocks means 1500 minutes, which means 25 hours. Then, if you change 15 minutes into 10 minutes, you changed also 100 blocks from 1500 minutes into 1000 minutes. And that could be too short, so Satoshi added 20 blocks to land in a "nice, round number in between". If you replace 1000 minutes into hours, it will give you 16 hours and 40 minutes. Not a "nice, round number". If you calculate it for 1500 minutes, it is "25 hours", but it was longer than 24 hours, so probably a bit too long. And then, "1200 minutes = 20 hours = 120 blocks" was just a nice value between 1000 and 1500 minutes.

Edit: Also remember that Satoshi loved decimal numbers. So, which values would you pick, that would meet those conditions?

1. The number of minutes, divisible by 10, or even by 100 if possible.
2. The number of hours, divisible by 10 if possible.
3. The number of blocks, also divisible by 10 if possible.

There are not that many values you can pick, if you replace "15 minutes per block" with "10 minutes per block", which means "100 blocks = 1000 minutes", instead of "100 blocks = 1500 minutes".

according to his own quote "20 hours" was not part of it.
it have been your words, not his!

at least to the one you wrote me.

do you have another quote where he implicitly says "20 hours"?

but thx for extending the explanation for this further. i still think those are good details for the relations for playing around with this if someone is more interested for it.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin version 0.0.8
by
Cr4shOverride
on 01/09/2023, 18:19:24 UTC
Quote
maybe the coinbase maturity was what you meant?
No, because it was 120, before it was simplified into 100. If you have 6 blocks per hour, then 120 was used as "20 hours".

After a block is created, the maturation time of 120 blocks is to make absolutely sure the block is part of the main chain before it can be spent.  Your node isn't doing anything with the block during that time, just waiting for other blocks to be added after yours.  You don't have to be online during that time.

i wanna quote this again cause i found this in 0.1.0 in lines 540 - 545

int CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity() const
{
    if (!IsCoinBase())
        return 0;
    return max(0, (COINBASE_MATURITY+20) - GetDepthInMainChain());
}

if you were not pointing on older versions than 0.0.8 (but i doubt he would have discussed them with anyone and only before this forum even existed via e-mail with at max 1 other guy cause the net transitioning from 0 to 1 was already also be implemented via a Left shift (line 33 inside an enum in node.h), from how i understanding this, he used it as a transitioning state thing in principle. basically to activate this version from OFF into ON inside the code (it means the moment you read this line the network basically switches ON). node.h and node.pp were renamed into net.h and net.cpp in version 0.1.0 there you will find the same build for this enum and i doubt this should be understood in any other way).

but back to my before put code example:

then this should solve the confusion where 120 origins from.

so basically he added another 20
but how you come into 20 hours is still not clear to me?

was it really 6 hours per block back then in block generation (what would have meant he did only work to build the code further after 20 hours where over. well ok sleep time and such. quite impressive discipline if you do this in a robotic way if you ask me.


well maybe you have some more insight i do not have yet. this really makes a lot of fun now, to reconstruct how this was build up Smiley