Indicators are pretty good, but it seems to me that this ease ICO creation can contribute to the fact that on this platform, many shit and scam projects will be deployed. Maybe I'm wrong not knowing this project deeply, but these were my first superficial thoughts on this.

No, this is complete nonsense and always was. Now any rating system is focused on quantity, instead of quality and it only supports the filling of this market with rubbish and scam

As a few coins from the top 100 have already shown their turn, although of course we should look on bitcoin and its turn. But in general, as it seems to me, now a favorable environment for buying altcoins, but only real projects that really develop an actual product or a whole direction.

By the way, I know only one project (this is DAOstack), which paid full bounty in ETH for legal reasons. At least that's how they explained it.

For example, this thread is already more than half a year and yes, we know only a few projects that applied this approach during this period. But it seems to me that in general the bounty as a direction is already changing and soon we will not see really good projects with traditional bounty campaigns, only a scam will remain.

Interesting. I have not heard about this project and this model of ICO. I will investigate this. Thanks for the info. In general, security tokens definitely a good thing

As if there was not, the main thing - don't participate in everything in a row. Don't support scam and shitty projects. Be avoidative and this can give you more good result. Although now there are quite a few really good projects that are conducted traditional bounty campaigns. Good luck in solving your problems

I think today it's relevant to consider the possibility of investing in powerful infrastructure projects that develop integrated solutions for mass collaboration and collective governance within the DAOs (companies, organizations, cities, nations). The most famous projects in this area today are DAOstack, Aragon, Bitnation, Colony

Thank you for sharing this. I checked this project and personally it seemed to me a typical ICO project for raising funds, instead of the real project which conduct ICO. Maybe I'm wrong, but at least outwardly it looks exactly like that.

I'm sure that with the introduction and distribution of solutions like Dether and PundiX this will happen much sooner. And as a whole already now a lot of business around the world accepts cryptocurrency as payment and also increasingly offers its employees the opportunity to receive salaries in the crypto too.

An important thing that all bounty participants should consider, regardless of what form of payment it is, there is no need to support shitty projects or projects that carry no real value and usefulness or are a hundredth copy of the original or at all an obvious scam

In any cases, it will be very good if people don't contribute to the projects of tokens which potentially can become useless. It is worthwhile to carry out a more thorough check of the projects before help them, otherwise very soon the market will finally turn into a dump.

Now, there are practically no worthy bounty campaigns, especially with payout in ETH. Decent projects are increasingly abandoning the typical bounty campaigns, as they often have a bad effect on reputation. The last project that made 100% payment in ETH - it was DAOstack.

I think that it makes sense to invest exclusively in strong projects with a strong work product that has already taken the leading place in its sector or is likely to do so. There are not a lot of such projects, but almost all of them are pretty much sunk, although it is likely that this is not yet a bottom. As well as probably that we are expecting a long calm

Moreover, many do not intend to survive, and for them the prevailing situation on the market is beneficial. This allows them to completely abandon the fulfillment of obligations and leave investors with bare tokens. This again shows that it's not worth investing in crappy projects, which is not difficult to identify among real ones.

I guess that we still have a dump and then a rather long calm. Although I have long ceased to be surprised at anything in this crazy market.
I am sure of one thing that we are in the beginning of the way, but this way will be substantially transformed.

It is often enough to look at the logo and the name of the project.
This is the first level of checking for me and I can assure you that 8-9 projects out of 10 do not pass it.
No matter how trite it sounds, try to find a project that can't be a scam

As a rule, bounty participants often drop tokens of bad projects, in which they also participate as well as in good ones. And this is the main problem contributing to the spread of the scam and the overall clogging of the ecosystem. And unfortunately the bounty participants are the main spreaders of this. If investors don't invest in bad projects, they will probably be less likely to face the situations of dropping coins by participants after distribution. But of course, the bounty participants should not contribute to shit and scam!

Personally, I now only participate in signature campaigns and it does not take much time, but it give additional tokens of projects that I really like and which I really support

Crypto it for a long time. Of course, everything will evolve, improve and what for the world and people doesn't need will die. In the future, I see more than one powerful, globally significant and useful projects / organizations / structures that the global community owns and manages. That is why I particularly support projects that are developing advanced solutions for mass collaboration and direct governance, such as DAOstack, Aragon, Bitnation, Colony