There's a future with OX but not too high expectations from it . I am just expecting it to be in 1 usd as its all time high in 2019 . If the market is good then it can be more .

Ok, on April 30th my wallet stopped syncing.  During this time it showed 126,000 of my coins "staking". A month and a half go by and I finally decide to delete and reinstall the wallet.  I save the .dat from the wallet and then delete everything.
I reinstall the wallet, no problem, syncs just fine.  Now, when I load up my .dat that i just saved from the original frozen wallet I now have a balance of 99 coins.  The staking coins from the frozen wallet are missing.
Just to see what happens I load up a previous saved .dat from March and my balance is now 108,000 coins, but I'm still missing 18,000 coins.  Wallet is synced up to the current block.
Any idea why I can't seem to get my full balance when I load up any of these past .dat files?
Thanks!

We can conclude the coin is dead. No major exchange will take this coin.

Any thought to making this coin 100% POS? I dont see the point to having the POW any more I imagine network is securable just w staking.

Have fun being the shittoken for Maduro's Socialist Paradise.  Venezuala and XEM are prefect complements; they deserve each other just like degeneracy and AIDS. 

Why are you rambling about Monero instead of answering my questions regarding "exactly what problem XEM solves" and how you plan to "spin the response of XEM core to the hack as anything other than self-serving talking points and opportunistic marketing?"  Are you just mad that XEM is now ranked below XMR?

Do you have the faintest idea exactly what problem XEM solves?  If you do, please let the rest of us know.

If you can't spin the the response of XEM core to the hack as anything other than self-serving talking points and opportunistic marketing, I'd understand.  It did seem fairly indefensible, and the market apparently feels the core devs' appallingly hand-waving self-congratulatory response was worse than the actual hack.

There are 30 billions of Siacoin in circulation, so valuing the project at $230 millions. That is a market cap 10 times more than 4 months ago, 20 times more than 5 month ago and 200 times more than one year ago. Do you dare to say there is no interest in the project? Sia is an already functional product offering 3 petabytes of data so far among 750 hosts, but there is of course room for new features (all of them are in their roadmap https://trello.com/b/Io1dDyuI/sia-public-roadmap) and a lot of room for adoption growth: the value will keep growing naturally the closer we get to the endgame of Sia.

Your problem is also that you are using as a reference of the value of Sia the Bitcoin. That is a bad idea in general: how can you use a reference point for the value of Sia a coin that has duplicated its value during the last month? That's a horrible control. Is anybody panicking around about the dollar devaluation because the USD/BTC charts say so? But in the case of Sia it has even less sense to use the BTC as a control for its value, as file contract prices are adjusted manually to dollar prices by the hosts. It is an economy linked t dollar prices. And if you check the SC/USD charts, you'll see Sia has grown enormously, reached a peak at 2 cents on May, and since then it has been stable at the 0.7-1 cent of dollar.

Ultimately, still you are only using market charts to determine how good a project is. Seiously @attilafx, if you are an investor and you are only looking at BTC charts to know which projects are good or not instead of checking more info, digging in the communities and learning abut upcoming features, sell right now all your positions in cryptos because very soon you are going to lose everything