Im not so convinced by this new identity management platform. They claim that first to market is irrelevant because the competition is buggy and not working properly but I see Civic making good progress, being more and more recognized and closing business partnerships left and right. It would be unfortunate to see Stratis becoming too spread out and wasting ressources best spent on a platform that will set them apart.
Any thoughts?
I'm also not as convinced anymore about the business model in general, and the schedule of development in particular.
Sure, the C# implementation looks great at first sight, but the fate of the project is too close tied to the fate of BTC, for my taste.
BTC dominance is tanking and Stratis just pisses away a lot of significance.
They should really put more focus on the development of the platform and side chains. This mixer tech is a nice feature, but not as important.
The masternodes should run contracts, not be just mixers. And they seem to be much too expensive. They are already between a rock and a hard place with the decision, because Tumblebit's anonymity will work better with fewer servers.
And they don't seem to be following segwit2x with Breeze, instead they are fanboys of the core whiners, which I found rather disappointing.
Its denial of reality which I didn't expect in such a well managed project with strong leadership.
Their Slack is probably the biggest circle jerk in crypto land. Bring up just a trace of scepticism and your messages are either deleted, or you're banned right away.
I also share those concerns. Although when asked, Chris clearly said Srtratis would support both chains in case of a hardfork. I wish they could do an interview soon so we know more clearly what they are working on and what their strategy is. The overzealous community is what concerns me the most. Just a few days ago I have been called a troll because I game an opinion in which I defended Stratis but basically tried keep things down to earth.