Both v20 and v20.1 seem to produce a lot of stale share…at one point 20.1 was producing 49 stale shares. Dropping back down to v19…if that doesn’t fix the issue, I am going back to Phoenix.

Yes: news version stale bad share, a rollback to "t-rex-ver. 0.19.12-cuda111" no stale

We are still waiting for me to dev, participate in the topics a little ... and explain to us !!!

Yep and wait for Lon Wong show with false wechat hype. That can do the trick I will give that a shot. I like pump and dump schemes.

Huh losses. I someone accumulated XEMs under 10 cents, now he has XEMs for 34cents and XYMs for around 50 (and it was around 70 few days ago), yep definetly that are devastating losses.

Annoucement for today

Binance distributed airdrop to NEM holders and they have yet announced any listing support for Symbol, before the snapshot and today. I don't think they will ignore a coin that gives them good trading volume like Symbol.

Price is unpredictable so in bull market, don't shake your hands too easily.

Symbol (XYM) Distribution Is Now Complete

A 3070 in a laptop has the same memory bandwidth as a 3060 ti and 3070 and more cuda cores then a 3060 ti. It can be faster then a desktop 3070 with an unlocked tdp vbios and/or a shunt mod. My laptop 3070 mines at 62 MHS.

I hope you wont be totally disappointed, if "your devs" aren't doing so cleanly 

Thats a sincere wish after reading old Nem forum writings. Specially the disagreement about how much XEM's were saved to Foundation accounts. The original plan was something like 25 % to F's but finally there was 50 - 60 %

Now six years later I cant avoid getting such an impression that most of the developers were young boys, who may have been genius crypto coin coders but less educated in ethics 
One interesting thing was also the lack of commenting by the leading coders. Apparently they didnt want to get dirt to their hands. If they wanted that Foundations get only 25 % then they said so. No comments at all means ,,,,, what ?   

Maybe one evolvement has been done in Symbol platform when they did drop the Foundations. Maybe also they read or even remembered the old disagreements. Or they just got older 

so far so good T-Rex ok ))

This is a known thing about NEM, the old devs dumped and manipulated everything. Even censoring their channels from people stating facts.

ProximaX claims to be the better improved NEM that split away from all the drama of the NEM community.

ProximaX did the right thing by taking the code with them and distancing themselves away from NEM.  

NEM is decentralized and public unlike XRP

Quite a lame answer ....
where is the definition of "scam coin"?
If Devs cashed out, then Why in the NEM rich list (https://nemnodes.org/richlist/) still exist Devs (Jaguar, gimre, Alice) with the same XEM amounts as since 2015 ?    


The one exact math, which is every time forgotten, is the fact that when someone sells, then also someone buys.
According to the distribution list changes the big owners have not sold. Of course some of them have sold, but in the big picture they have not sold, because the Top100 has increased their ownings from 57 %   to   71 %.  


Distribution Fri, 05 Jan 2018 18:33:44 UTC:
Top Accounts           XEM                                         Percentage
Top 50                    4,804,818,406.12                         53.4%
Top 100                   5,119,481,371.59                         56.9%
Top 200                   5,455,792,305.26                       60.6%
Top 250                   5,609,101,108.18                       62.3%
Top 500                   6,365,621,548.69                       70.7%
All                           8,999,999,999                         100%




Distribution Fri, 12 Mar 2021 05:39:36 UTC:
Top Accounts           XEM                                         Percentage
Top 50                    6,166,236,694.24                       68.5%
Top 100                   6,423,452,170.92                         71.4%
Top 200                   6,739,353,256.10                       74.9%
Top 250                   6,890,203,307.06                         76.6%
Top 500                   7,543,466,571.50                       83.8%
All                           8,999,999,999                           100%



That may be mainly caused by the exchanges' accounts (people have moved their XEMs there...), but still: the Top100 individual owners have not sold much of their ownings. Now can easily be detected only 3 names whose accounts have been "emptied": mixmaster, bogdana and rockethead.

There may be different reasons: transferred to 3 MXEM nodes to harvest, or to exchanges to trade. Or to exchanges to ensure the XYM airdrop instead of "not-so-working-XYM-wallet-in-own-computer". Or to exchanges to sell some to cover the expenses of life. The last is the reason for some, no need for examples ...