Who is/was stealing coins? Wallet was compiled and installed regularly with default settings on yiimp pool. Reward was 5 coins w. linux wallet and 4 coins w. windows wallet.

Its on you to check your code, instead of making changes every week and then telling us, anybody has stolen coins...

Do you expect any benefit from Masternodes? Imho it would be better to start MNs after longer mining period. If nobody will mine and buy coins, then price will fall.

https://ibb.co/bGYGFS

Anybody interested to know my experience with this shit?

(@first: Why are there 3 bitcointalk threads for this coin?)

Hi @all,

the last days super dev has updated many times wallet for this and for that... ohh and something else.

But start at first. New Coin... i thought MN for 1,000 coins is ok, lets mine some coins solo on my yiimp pool.

After some days i saw... oohh MN costs now 10,000 coins!

I bought some hashpower to get 10,000 coins for my 1is MN and immediately my wallet got stucked and must updated to newer version, because of thousands orphans and no valid blocks anymore. A lot of Hashpower was blowing in the wind

New wallet works until yesterday, thousands orphans again. After update to newest release 1.12.0.61 mining reward is only 1 coin. I verified this and saw also on other pools. WTF is this?

What is devs intention?  Payout = 5 Coins/Block ( 4 Coins > MN, 1 Coin > Miner)

Perfect for Masternodes, but 1 coin for mining is definitely too less. This shitcoin has only a value of 6 USD Cent and small marketcap...
And Masternodes earns nothing from mining when nobody is willing to do...

What do you think?

pls send me pm with transaction no if you have any problems. I will care about that. Satoshibox normally uses cookies to let you download software after finishing payment. So use link again and check if download is available now.

CGMiner version is 4.10.0

Instead of blaspheming and cursing, you could also remain friendly and objective. But that seems to be the standard in this forum. So I ignore it.

I make no secret that it is a variant of Blissz's firmware. But it is not a fake and works very reliable without DevFee.

Everyone should decide for themselves whether it is useful or not.

Antminer D3 firmware Mod NoFee version!!

Thanks to Blissz for creating this special improvements for Antminer D3 miners.

This firmware is based on Blissz version 1.12 but DevFee was removed. That means for you

no more switching between pools
no more devfee mining
no more reboots when pools are offline
The last goodies like Antbleed fix are also included.

This firmware is not for free anymore. Please support this work by spending a few satoshies for it. Thank you.

https://satoshibox.com/g2dmhrbzfvp2mzmntnqmgnpn

thx a lot. Also it's a matter of time, i will be patient...

Wallet (Windows) out of sync...

Hi, maybe somebody can help me a little bit. Yesterday, i was unable to create a wallet on cryptopia, because of site errors.

So, i installed a windows wallet, but it's not synced completely. On the bottom there is a message like 'checkpoint to old, please wait until...'.

Today, i deleted all files from data folder and left only wallet.dat & Trezarcoin.conf and started from scratch.

Here is my Trezarcoin.conf:

irc=0
dns=1
qtstyle=2
daemon=1
server=1
stakegen=1
logtimestamps=1
minersleep=2000
stakemindepth=1000
stakemintime=24
stakecombine=2000
stakesplit=4000
port=17298
rpcport=17299
rpcallowip=127.0.0.*
rpcuser=forgetaboutit
rpcpassword=localhostonly
connect=37.244.226.197:17298
connect=68.39.38.63:17298
connect=27.254.172.143:17298
connect=86.57.164.146:17298
connect=71.15.211.22:17298
connect=81.67.10.177:17298
connect=138.197.189.202:17298
connect=88.99.228.50:17298
connect=64.191.8.221:17298
connect=90.190.41.166:17298
connect=71.187.207.208:17298
connect=92.251.20.64:17298
connect=90.127.10.26:17298
connect=76.116.105.183:17298
connect=100.38.129.82:17298

Node addresses are taken from Cryptopia, because this will be my favourite exchange. Missed i something?

hi blissz, you asked for feedback and tips.

a good start for autotune is a 'lastgood' variable, containing after every tune the last working level of mh/s each chain. So you could set the new starting value after reboot to 'lastgood' - 18 as example...

Maybe bad news...

Here is an example code to build an X11 hash:

void x11_hash(const char* input, char* output, uint32_t len)
{
    sph_blake512_context     ctx_blake;
    sph_bmw512_context       ctx_bmw;
    sph_groestl512_context   ctx_groestl;
    sph_skein512_context     ctx_skein;
    sph_jh512_context        ctx_jh;
    sph_keccak512_context    ctx_keccak;

    sph_luffa512_context      ctx_luffa1;
    sph_cubehash512_context      ctx_cubehash1;
    sph_shavite512_context      ctx_shavite1;
    sph_simd512_context      ctx_simd1;
    sph_echo512_context      ctx_echo1;

    //these uint512 in the c++ source of the client are backed by an array of uint32
    uint32_t hashA[16], hashB[16];   

    sph_blake512_init(&ctx_blake);
    sph_blake512 (&ctx_blake, input, len);
    sph_blake512_close (&ctx_blake, hashA);

    sph_bmw512_init(&ctx_bmw);
    sph_bmw512 (&ctx_bmw, hashA, 64);
    sph_bmw512_close(&ctx_bmw, hashB);

    sph_groestl512_init(&ctx_groestl);
    sph_groestl512 (&ctx_groestl, hashB, 64);
    sph_groestl512_close(&ctx_groestl, hashA);

    sph_skein512_init(&ctx_skein);
    sph_skein512 (&ctx_skein, hashA, 64);
    sph_skein512_close (&ctx_skein, hashB);

    sph_jh512_init(&ctx_jh);
    sph_jh512 (&ctx_jh, hashB, 64);
    sph_jh512_close(&ctx_jh, hashA);

    sph_keccak512_init(&ctx_keccak);
    sph_keccak512 (&ctx_keccak, hashA, 64);
    sph_keccak512_close(&ctx_keccak, hashB);
   
    sph_luffa512_init (&ctx_luffa1);
    sph_luffa512 (&ctx_luffa1, hashB, 64);
    sph_luffa512_close (&ctx_luffa1, hashA);   
   
    sph_cubehash512_init (&ctx_cubehash1);
    sph_cubehash512 (&ctx_cubehash1, hashA, 64);   
    sph_cubehash512_close(&ctx_cubehash1, hashB); 
   
    sph_shavite512_init (&ctx_shavite1);
    sph_shavite512 (&ctx_shavite1, hashB, 64);   
    sph_shavite512_close(&ctx_shavite1, hashA); 
   
    sph_simd512_init (&ctx_simd1);
    sph_simd512 (&ctx_simd1, hashA, 64);   
    sph_simd512_close(&ctx_simd1, hashB);
   
    sph_echo512_init (&ctx_echo1);
    sph_echo512 (&ctx_echo1, hashB, 64);   
    sph_echo512_close(&ctx_echo1, hashA);

    memcpy(output, hashA, 32);
   
}

As u can see, there are many sub algos affected to make an x11 hash. These algos are hardcoded in bitmains asic chips. So you can input some work and get outputted the result of the complete x11 hash.

I took a deep look into cgminer (also the newest version) and what i found was only to put work into asic and get results back. My hope was, that it could work like Baikalminer, but i was wrong here.

Good Luck

I have already ordered one Baikal X10 miner from 1st batch. Maybe i will receive the device next week. If anybody interested to ge the image, please tell me.

Hi, i'm also an owner of some Antminer D3 devices.

My skills are software engineering, but my world is microsoft based and not linux. But i have installed cygwin and unpacked the new firmware (initramfs.bin.SD) to a folder to inspect all files. My idea is to get sgminer (from new Baikal X10) up and running. That would be very cool, but i don't know where to start.

What i can see is, that Antminer runs cgminer 4.9.0 and Baikal runs sgminer...

Is this possible? Anybody else an idea?

Here is the unpacked Folder from last firmware update.

https://mega.nz/#!JhhEhBqR!WWQEH3k-6meKovCf-snZmf8Wo-1VaMEwiS2tfOyLNgQ

selling 1,400 IRD for 355 satoshi each
on interst please pm

= 0.00497000 BTC
= 0.08308250 ETH
= 0.10804333 ZEC

Did you read the thread about +58 mh/s nvidia modded driver? This was an fake and i payed 200 USD on satoshibox.com.

All i got was the original NVIDIA driver.

You may think i'm stupid, but in my opinion, it can be possible to tweak NVIDIA gpus in this way a litlte bit. Now, i found this video and i'm not willing to make the same mistake... But it sounds possible to me.

By the way: in the mentioned thread, the starter was also suspected to have created the video itself. That's why I made it clear at the beginning. But that was probably not useful ...

Hi folks,

first of all, i don't have any relationship to the creator of this video i found on youtube: https://youtu.be/vfXzcMLxCAU. I asked already in other thread but don't got an answer.

Can this be legit? Or is it another type of scam?

Hi folks,

i have read a lot about scammers, but sometimes it's hard to identify it. IMHO 58 mh/s per GTX 1070 is impossible.

I found another video on Youtube https://youtu.be/vfXzcMLxCAU

The Guy is getting 38 mh/s per GTX 1070 with tesla drivers. Can this be legit?