Thanks for pointing these, these users are removed from the campaign. I will fill these spots next week.

First, I will not evaluate the criteria that a manager will choose someone. Next, there is no injustice here, managers have the right to choose those that they feel good.
In this case, we should discuss why those members are accepted, definitely, there is shady here.
There are a total of 11 pages of applications in the campaign    He can choose anyone better, who is always active. And now he accepts people who have been inactive for a long time. I wonder if there is any relationship between him and the people mentioned above?  Or they are his alt accounts  I think this should be investigated clearly, or at least he needs to explain 

Agreed with this, I don't know what is the basis of the manager why does he accept these people? yes they "should atleast have a 5 merits in last 120days" but it can be considered once their post has a good quality, but then, seeing some of the participants put their "total merit"(so it looks like they have plenty not the "merits they received in the last 3months" user Shallow doesn't have atleast 1 , some of them(almost all of the users stated above) are inactive for a month. Yes maybe some of you will tell me that I am bitter because I did not accepted, well yes why? because there are some people doesn't worth the slot, I am not saying that I am more deserving, but compare to those, I am confidently say YES I AM.

Just an advise manager cause you have the final say but ever since I'm on this forum no campaign manager has ever accepted an account that is inactive for more than 7days, 4weeks which shows they only contribute to the forum because of the signature campaigns not to even mention not having the require 5merit.
This is injustice to the genuine user of this forum.


 Henmark
perfect999
stepwilli
Emitdama
starkovblue
Shallow
SirLancelot
funchiestz