Search content
Sort by
Showing 8 of 8 results by DappInvestigator
Re: [PRE-ANN] WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform.
it does seem like a waste. maybe it will work if we rally together and move out of bittrex. let that whale have it by himself.
move our coin to an exchange that will list waves.
move our coin to an exchange that will list waves.
"That whale" is Sasha, the 5k he took out of bitcoin funds is being used for buy support.
Is the reason why Polo never really list waves? and that Sasha never really have the intention to list there?
I guess this is just something that we didn't look into before investing. Minable coin still is where we should get into then.
Sasha already answered about that many times : All informations needed has been given to Poloniex for adding Waves, now, it's 100% in the hand of Poloniex !
Re: [ANN][ARDR] Ardor, or Nxt 2.0, a Scalable Child Chain Platform
I dont understand Why people arent holding 
Ardor has a very big potencial... Nxt will increased the price 10x in one or two month, very easy...
Ardor has a very big potencial... Nxt will increased the price 10x in one or two month, very easy...It's starting to pump on poloniex, just wait and you'll see it rising soon !
There is still a lots of people who didn't heard about this awesome coming 2.0
Re: [ANN][ARDR] Ardor, or Nxt 2.0, a Scalable Child Chain Platform
Any exchanges available?
You didn't read anything from the first post right ?
Launched in October and if you want Ardor token (fnxt), you need to buy and keep NXT in your wallet between july and october
Re: [PRE-ANN] WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform.
This just seems like poor planning. A missed 14th deadline that should have been provided to exchanges pre the 14th in time for the actual release. No press or updates from the Dev team on a failed exchange listing timeline is troubling no matter how you look at it. Saying it's all on the exchanges is a pretty lame excuse, devs failed to properly plan for their own timelines.
14th deadline was a "ready to launch on exchanges" date, not a "trading start" date.
Only pump&dumpers and "get rich quick scheme" can't wait one or two more days before trading Waves.
I prefer a better and secure Waves platform than a launched-as-fast-as-possible platform.
Real Waves believer can wait and are here for a long term, we don't care about the delay because we don't care about all that bulk of dumpers at launch as fast as possible who didn't understand the real potential of Waves
They already added an additional 2 weeks to their first 'launch' date.
Only a moron would be happy to lose access to their bitcoins even longer.
Lose access to their bitcoins ?? Sorry, I thought they bought Waves, not bitcoin
ICO price is still the same, the project is still the same, the potential is still the same, and the project still moving on.
What is the problem ? Are you new here ? Did you not know that most of ICO have delay at launch ?
Everybody should know when they are investing into a ICO, it can have a delay, they can loose money and they take a risk !
I'm sorry for you if you don't know how investing into something works and what can happens during and after the ICO.
This is how works investment in the crypto world, same for stocks market, same for crowfunding, etc... You should deal with it.
This is so ridiculous all that cryings about this small delay, Waves team should be sorry for the delay for making you rich
Re: [PRE-ANN] WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform.
This just seems like poor planning. A missed 14th deadline that should have been provided to exchanges pre the 14th in time for the actual release. No press or updates from the Dev team on a failed exchange listing timeline is troubling no matter how you look at it. Saying it's all on the exchanges is a pretty lame excuse, devs failed to properly plan for their own timelines.
14th deadline was a "ready to launch on exchanges" date, not a "trading start" date.
Only pump&dumpers and "get rich quick scheme" can't wait one or two more days before trading Waves.
I prefer a better and secure Waves platform than a launched-as-fast-as-possible platform.
Real Waves believers can wait and are here for a long term, we don't care about the delay because we don't care about all that bulk of dumpers who want to dump at launch as fast as possible just for making money and who didn't understand the real potential of Waves
Why the Waves team should care of you seriously ? You didn't support the project at all by acting like that.
I'm happy you can't handle with that delay
Re: [ANN][LISK] Lisk | ICO | Decentralized Application & Sidechain Platform
We need a press release about this successful ICO on main cryptonews websites !
Re: [ANN][LISK] Lisk | ICO | Decentralized Application & Sidechain Platform
You can't talk about a "success" of the team when the project is just started and brings almost nothing for the moment ! Come on, be serious.
The motivational concept doesn't works if they already have a huge rewards at the start, just before realizing the project !
Rewards should be earned AFTER realizing something great.
Let me get this straight. The more successful the management team is, the more you want to reduce their reward.
Interesting motivational concept.
This is not FUD and I am crying right there with you.
My beloved grandfather told me once "Sometimes you just gotta grunt "
The motivational concept doesn't works if they already have a huge rewards at the start, just before realizing the project !
Rewards should be earned AFTER realizing something great.
With that unexpected ICO raised money amount (according to Lisk team), maybe the two members of the team could reduce their personal rewards of 8% of all Lisk ?
I believe in this project in long term run and I bought a lot of Lisk, but i think a such amount of Lisk (and its current dollar value) hold by two persons is unnecessary and should be reduced in favor of all investors who have taken risks in that ICO.
Just an idea, no offense
I believe in this project in long term run and I bought a lot of Lisk, but i think a such amount of Lisk (and its current dollar value) hold by two persons is unnecessary and should be reduced in favor of all investors who have taken risks in that ICO.
Just an idea, no offense
Let me get this straight. The more successful the management team is, the more you want to reduce their reward.
Interesting motivational concept.
One thing that worries me is this. With all the money raise we all get less coins which means the coins will have to be worth more after launch to get our money back. there fore the more people join then the bigger chance of lots of bag holders? Is this a valid concern or am I just raising FUD?
My coins are disappearing and I am crying daily. Each blow takes away a part of my soul and dreams.
My coins are disappearing and I am crying daily. Each blow takes away a part of my soul and dreams.
This is not FUD and I am crying right there with you.
My beloved grandfather told me once "Sometimes you just gotta grunt "
Re: [ANN][LISK] Lisk | ICO | Decentralized Application & Sidechain Platform
With that unexpected ICO raised money amount (according to Lisk team), maybe the two members of the team could reduce their personal rewards of 8% of all Lisk ?
I believe in this project in long term run and I bought a lot of Lisk, but i think a such amount of Lisk (and its current dollar value) hold by two persons is unnecessary and should be reduced in favor of all investors who have taken risks in that ICO.
Just an idea, no offense
I believe in this project in long term run and I bought a lot of Lisk, but i think a such amount of Lisk (and its current dollar value) hold by two persons is unnecessary and should be reduced in favor of all investors who have taken risks in that ICO.
Just an idea, no offense