first of all, thank you all for the feedback!


well its not like i did something very illegal. I just want to go sure. Anonymity is important for me.

The concept I suggested has one advantage: anonymity is assured by monero which is open source. Those mixer services are mostly not open-source and have more likely a vulnerability than monero.


and yes both services (morpthoken and xmr.to) have no KYC, no registration

Yes the fee's are def a con. I already tried it, its smth about 5% fee in total.

@BitMaxz, thats a very interesting method. Heard that first time that a "mixing" service doesnt actually mix but use new coins. I will have a look. The good thing is, you can verify that the coins are new.
Edit: cant see on the chipmixer website, that they mention to use new coins :S ?

Hello,I know its better to use only XMR to make sure to stay anonymous. However some merchants still dont accept monero, and somtimes people also just want to pay you with BTC.

So what do you think of following anonymity plan regarding BTC usage (combined with XMR):

BTC Address W (mine, not anonym) -> BTC Address X (controlled by Morpthoken service, converts to XMR. this is input address for conversion)XMR Address A (controlled by Morphtoken, output address) -> XMR Address B (mine) -> XMR Address C (controlled by XMR.to service, converts to BTC. this is input address for conversion)BTC Address Y (controlled by XMR.to service, output address) -> BTC Address Z (mine, anonym) -> BTC Address V (merchant)

So the coins from the first BTC address shouldnt be traceable to the last BTC address. Assume also that for each transaction you use different amount at different time.And since we use also two different conversion services you make sure that the services self arent a weak point (and do not require registration).

What do you think of this anonymity/privacy plan? I think it is far more recommended than using any BTC mixing service (many are proven to be unsecure).