Trying to cite Satoshi Nakamoto as some defense for your software REALLY tells me a lot about you, their software was OPEN SOURCE, while yours remains closed source and had data stripped to conceal its contents, you also included auto-update software via torrent that would allow you to put anything onto someones computer now or in the future and they just have to "trust you" that its safe, guess who never did that, Satoshi Nakamoto.

Now you CLAIM to have removed the auto-update software but you can't REALLY prove that, because once again your software is closed source and we just have to "trust you" there isn't simply a better masked version of it within, you know who never did that, the very person you're attempting to steal name recognition from to deflect away from your shortcomings and gigantic red flags waving about your past, present, and unknown future actions.

You are the epitome of software that is dangerous and wrong for crypto, and your responses to people bringing that up on other forums simply casts more red flags upon you.

Trying to cite Satoshi Nakamoto as some defense for your software REALLY tells me a lot about you, their software was OPEN SOURCE, while yours remains closed source and had data stripped to conceal its contents, you also included auto-update software via torrent that would allow you to put anything onto someones computer now or in the future and they just have to "trust you" that its safe, guess who never did that, Satoshi Nakamoto.

Now you CLAIM to have removed the auto-update software but you can't REALLY prove that, because once again your software is closed source and we just have to "trust you" there isn't simply a better masked version of it within, you know who never did that, the very person you're attempting to steal name recognition from to deflect away from your shortcomings and gigantic red flags waving about your past, present, and unknown future actions.

You are the epitome of software that is dangerous and wrong for crypto, and your responses to people bringing that up on other forums simply casts more red flags upon you.

1. You claimed on another site four people have been involved in this process for over a year, I would expect at least one to be known by someone, but it seems all four are complete mysterious unknowns without an ounce of provenance between them, in crypto, thats a big deal when many signs are pointing to scam. (and thats one of the big ones)
2. Once again we circle back to lack of provenance for four people trying very hard to have no past history or current connections.
3. I'm not going to point out several things misstated just yet, but I would expect four people who have been involved a year to not make such rookie blunders if they truly had an advanced understanding.
4. (see 3.)
5. We couldn't actually disable automatic updates because its closed source and you are using bittorrent within it, so lets be a little genuine here that most will never be able to secure their machines enough to stop your closed source software and it can tell them anything you want it to whether they disable autoupdate or not.

Running something in a VM is not really a proof it works or works without unintended consequences tomorrow or the next day, thats the problem with an unknown group (who is trying very hard to remain anonymous) making claims with no connections to the community or seemingly the outside world in crypto or otherwise.

Extreme caution should be used with this closed source software.

1. they are unknown users with no documented history in the community
2. the domain name used was created days ago
3. some of the terminology they have used is incorrect
4. some of the facts they have stated are incorrect
5. the software automatically updating means they can put whatever they want on your computer

combine all that with wild promises of 30% gains over all other software thats been worked on for years from multiple parties and projects, its ripe with scam warnings galore.

you also left out that ETNX added a SECOND premine on one of their forks... they literally paid themselves a second time after selling off all their original coins, it doesn't get anymore scam than that, thats why they got removed...

P.S. they claim it was asked by them to prevent any exchange to exchange manipulation, how can you manipulate the lowest possible trade of 0.00000001 btc lol, seriously they just keep making up excuse after excuse...

is there a discord for all of this, I saw someone mention a FPGA discord but saw no link...

you're not going to repeat yourself not answering the question? lets make it super basic...

there are what roughly 15 billion etnx in circulation, etn owns roughly 7 billion, you roughly 7 billion, and everyone else has whatever is left, thats a fair enough estimate... so the entire problem you said about someone having to much control and quantity, is now two-fold, you and etn now have too much and everyone else has too little...

so how could you now with a straight face tell investors this is no big deal, when the problem has not gone away, it was just amplified and a new secondary winner was picked, you, to hold so many coins... but you can't stop etn from selling their 7 billion now, and they can keep doing that for DECADES at 1 million coins a day sold...

but then again, at the current value of 0.00000001 I don't see a lot of people in a rush to buy, so how is this not a gigantic issue when electroneum hasn't even begun selling off their coins which they have no reason to hold... a 7 billion coin mistake looming over this coin isn't going to disappear overnight, how is that not a huge problem?

once again you dodged the point I made... your attempt to diminish my statement as "its such a small amount of the total supply" does NOTHING to address the supply/demand issue when someone is dumping a million coins a day, or maybe 10 million coins a day, EVERY SINGLE DAY for years, depressing any demand because nobody wants a coin that is forever stuck in one spot or sinking because others now sell theirs off as well...

how can you claim exchanges might solve this??? supply and demand is what it is, and when a million coins are being dumped, the price of this coin surely would never rise, how can this coin succeed when 7 billion coins from your "competitor" could be used any given time to destroy its value for investors? nobody can afford to invest in something THIS risky to manipulation, and really its not even manipulation, they have no need to keep your coin, every reason to sell it and use those funds for their coin, how can YOU solve this, you can not, and thats the problem...

you once again are dodging the question...

with Electroneum having 7 billion ETNX under its control, how will you stop Electroneum from selling 1 million coins a day and depressing prices of ETNX for the next 20 years? thats how long it could take to sell through 7 billion...

they have no reason to keep your copy coin, so why wouldn't they sell a constant stream of them in order to use that money to fund their own coin, you keep dodging how you plan to deal with this very big reality for investors...

how will you prevent Electroneum from depressing prices of ETNX for years to come when they will control close to 7 billion coins outright with a 1:1 swap? they could sell 1 million coins a day for 20 years, how will you create enough demand to sustain that, I just don't see how this coin doesn't get destroyed quickly with that looming over its head...

(quoting one of the "selling points" of this coin in the first posting of this thread)

"""another  7  billion  is  apparently  being  held  up  to  feed  the  mobile  miner.  These  extreme  figures  represent  a  big  risk  for  users  due  to  a  large  amount  of  capital  being  controlled  by  the  ETN  team"""

P.S. side note, you doubled this very problem setting some aside YOU control for the mobile miner, plus and almost equal amount set aside for you, so you tripled the problem you use as a selling point why we should use this coin.

good to get clarification on block 280,000 but the other question still stands, if one big selling point of this was electroneum having billions of coins, won't they now also have billions of this new coin, for all the coins they possess waiting to be used, plus all the coins from the user wallets through their website that I suspect they won't release to people in any way shape or form? so they will have the monster share of this new coin and could manipulate or drop the value of this forked coin in a heartbeat? I can't really think of any way to get around that and remove them having majority share of new coins?

how will that issue be addressed if the people you dislike, could manipulate your price on any exchanges you get listed, what viability is there when that could be the case, it would certainly be a dick move by them if they did it, but so is cloning their name and trying to branch off them... so they might return the favor so to speak and destroy any value for quite some time as it will take eons before anyone could mine enough coins even at increased rates to counter them dumping billions upon billions of coins? or do you have a way to weed out their accounts and not give them a 1:1 because I can't think of any way...

so if one of the issues was Electroneum having the huge premine, will this coin be expunging all those premine coins so they don't have a large control of the supply of this coin as well? or will Electroneum still have billions of coins in this new coin since its a 1:1 fork? and what happens to all users who have their app wallet that doesn't give them access to any private key to import into a new wallet, and that accounts for the bulk of their coins...

so basically, almost nobody will have coins and little reason to cross over to a new fork because they don't control the wallets to extract forked coins? or Electroneum will have billions of the new coin and could any given day of the week drop its value immensely out of spite, or just to screw around?

P.S. and is it block 260,000 or block 280,000 since both are stated and conflict quite a bit heh... image says 260,000 text says 280,000... which one...

I've already tried this, tried numerous miners, tried various multiple thread tricks, they don't improve performance on the Radeon Pro Duo, so far claymore 10.2 at this 2040 setting it falls back to when I set higher numbers is the best H/s overall no matter what I do in the other miners, which is why I am trying to figure out if this is some hard coded limit because he didn't expect anyone to have larger than 8GB cards, it would be nice to see what 2304 with double memory enabled will do for this card and miner. no other intensity settings performed better, maxed was best, which indicates to me I have a lot of head room to go with this card, but I'm simply not able to capitalize on it yet, normally folks clog their cards and have to lower intensity, I seem to be in the opposite scenario where I am hitting some software limited wall, at least thats my assumption, I just don't know, which is why I am asking if folks know if there is a limit like this, its not like we can view source to find out so all I can do is ask and hope heh.

P.S. and yes I have tried 3 thread even 4 threads with those other miners, they always seem to choke on it, when I tried copying files to run two completely separate instances the program would kill itself, so I've tried everything I can possibly think of and have run out of ideas. I realize this is a workstation card so the odds of me finding someone with direct experience is almost zero, but hey its the internet, maybe I'll get lucky right.

Sooo I have a bit of an unusual situation, almost nobody uses workstation GPU's to mine with, my project is over and now I have a "Radeon Pro Duo (polaris)" sitting idle doing nothing at all, it gets recognized as an RX 480/580 Ellesmere GPU which is basically what it is, but my problem is the largest intensity I can set is 2040 because any number larger just gets changed to 2040 and I am wondering if this is a software limitation? The GPU has 32GB total split into two 16GB chunks, one for each chip on the card, but it seems I can't use a full 2304 so every shader has its 2MB plus double memory enabled.

I don't suppose anyone has insight to this, I realize this is the 0.01% question but I just don't see anything stopping me from using 2304 intensity with double memory since that's only 9216MB which is well below the 16GB per chip on the card, it just changes it to 2040 when I use higher numbers.

Claymore 10.2
Windows 10 Pro
Blockchain Drivers
24GB System RAM (pagefile sizes up to 128GB tried makes no difference with or without one)

With intensity 2040 and a -20 power limit I get 1300 H/s and I can't help but wonder, what could I get if I was able to use 2304 instead, but it just won't let me set anything higher, it always changes itself back to 2040 on me, is this an internal limit since nobody expected a workstation card to be used?