Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 34 results by DenBlad
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
⭐ Merited by fillippone (1)
they are proving it to the institutions and the corporate world that you can hedge off the dollar with more than cash in the bank. This was done with gold reserves, and slowly has gone away from the spotlight.
Do you see it breaking a new ATH?
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2024/10/27/KYkV8.jpeg
With that information we see above, it shows that Bitcoin has had a very positive year, and the year isn’t even over yet. If it hits a new ATH by the end of the year, that percentage of profit will increase significantly. We should definitely believe in investing in Bitcoin since it's backed by data.
If there are people we want to convince to invest but who are still doubtful, we can point them to this thread. They can ask questions, and we’re ready to share facts with them.
Quote
According to the latest report from New York Digital Investment Group (NYDIG), Bitcoin continues to stand out as the best-performing asset in 2024. Additionally, Q4 is expected to remain positive for Bitcoin’s price, despite facing various challenges.
https://beincrypto.com/bitcoin-best-performing-asset-2024/With that information we see above, it shows that Bitcoin has had a very positive year, and the year isn’t even over yet. If it hits a new ATH by the end of the year, that percentage of profit will increase significantly. We should definitely believe in investing in Bitcoin since it's backed by data.
If there are people we want to convince to invest but who are still doubtful, we can point them to this thread. They can ask questions, and we’re ready to share facts with them.
everyone really knew that ethereum didn't have much network utility once they discovered the NFT's were not on chain. It was a transaction proof they were buying. No use case was discovered by the market.
I expect the fees and wallet addresses to reach a new All time high in 2025 as well. The latest developments of L1, L2, ordinals, BRC20, it is unavoidable to see all the charts go up for Bitcoin in 2025.
What makes you think that, the fee hike was happening at the end of the cycle when the correction was near and the price had exploded to new levels.
It is true that the fees are low but some are still paying higher fees either because of BRC-20 (Ordinals) or because they are using bad wallets which means there is a possibility that the fees will rise significantly in 2025.
If we take what happened in 2017 as an example of bad fees, we will find that the price rises first and then the fees rise.
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/10/21/8xDoC.png
It is true that the fees are low but some are still paying higher fees either because of BRC-20 (Ordinals) or because they are using bad wallets which means there is a possibility that the fees will rise significantly in 2025.
If we take what happened in 2017 as an example of bad fees, we will find that the price rises first and then the fees rise.
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/10/21/8xDoC.png
I have not seen any verifiable emails that this is real. Who verified it?
I mean nowadays, because when I registered there was a lot of spam, but someone tell me this isn't stupid.
100 Push-Ups A Day Until Bitcoin Is $100K Challenge
I had seen the thread before and I guess because of the title I hadn't stopped to read it but now I see that it is 174 pages long, a spam megathread at its best.
At first you might think that this is just a funny way of doing sport, but no, if you know anything about physical education, doing 100 push-ups a day is bollocks to begin with, but here's what's most relevant:
I imagine it's a fake, but if Satoshi really said that, in this case he said some nonsense. You can be very intelligent and say some nonsense from time to time, it's not incompatible.
And in this case, to think that doing 100 push-ups has anything to do with what happens in the price has more to do with going with a loincloth than with any rational speculation.
That does not belong to speculation, as the first comment says:
I'm going to report it again to off topic. I'm sure it won't grow at the rate of 22 pages a month there.
Edit, I was going to report it and I see this:
100 Push-Ups A Day Until Bitcoin Is $100K Challenge
I had seen the thread before and I guess because of the title I hadn't stopped to read it but now I see that it is 174 pages long, a spam megathread at its best.
At first you might think that this is just a funny way of doing sport, but no, if you know anything about physical education, doing 100 push-ups a day is bollocks to begin with, but here's what's most relevant:
I imagine it's a fake, but if Satoshi really said that, in this case he said some nonsense. You can be very intelligent and say some nonsense from time to time, it's not incompatible.
And in this case, to think that doing 100 push-ups has anything to do with what happens in the price has more to do with going with a loincloth than with any rational speculation.
That does not belong to speculation, as the first comment says:
This may seem related to bitcoin speculation but it is not bitcoin speculation at all. We are not speculation on bitcoin price but to know if someone can know if he or she can go up to 100 push ups before bitcoin hit six digits. This belongs to off-topic.
I'm going to report it again to off topic. I'm sure it won't grow at the rate of 22 pages a month there.
Edit, I was going to report it and I see this:
Quote
Old post: We generally do not moderate posts this old for on-topicness, substantiveness, multi-posting, and other "cleanliness" issues.
it is easier to use magisat.io and you don't have to connect the wallet right away.
Start by copy and pasting your traditional bitcoin wallet address.
If you find any sats share what you found, and I can provide some basic guidance
That site doesn't seem to be very privacy friendly when it comes to Tor, at least as far as I'm concerned it refuses to connect because it can't pass the CF check.
I don't even know where to start with such a check, and somehow it doesn't seem logical to me (for the sake of privacy) to enter my addresses or transactions in that site. I have to admit that there are some really smart people who sell literally what should be worthless for a real fortune - but I wonder who are the people who are willing to pay for something like that?
Even if I have some hidden treasure, I'll leave it buried for now
Start by copy and pasting your traditional bitcoin wallet address.
If you find any sats share what you found, and I can provide some basic guidance
For curiosity, use it is acceptable but use it with Tor connection. Security wise.
~snip~
~snip~
That site doesn't seem to be very privacy friendly when it comes to Tor, at least as far as I'm concerned it refuses to connect because it can't pass the CF check.
I just discovered this nice web site which lets you know if you hold any rare satoshi
---
Do you have anything ?
---
Do you have anything ?
I don't even know where to start with such a check, and somehow it doesn't seem logical to me (for the sake of privacy) to enter my addresses or transactions in that site. I have to admit that there are some really smart people who sell literally what should be worthless for a real fortune - but I wonder who are the people who are willing to pay for something like that?
Even if I have some hidden treasure, I'll leave it buried for now
The AI already uses basic indicators, but I want to figure out how to combine them. Or maybe use all of them at once, it's still unclear.
I'm open to a public test and am trying to launch a beta version, but I don't have enough resources yet.
Thanks for the idea about open-source trading bots, I hadn’t thought of that before.
I'm open to a public test and am trying to launch a beta version, but I don't have enough resources yet.
Thanks for the idea about open-source trading bots, I hadn’t thought of that before.
what resources do you need?
Observing mempool.space, I also don't really saw that many big consolidation transactions taking place.
Thus, I'm concluding that the activity rise this time is genuine Bitcoin transaction activity. It's not unlikely that it is related to the price increase in the last days. Retailers are returning slowly to get their share of Uptober, perhaps ?
Thus, I'm concluding that the activity rise this time is genuine Bitcoin transaction activity. It's not unlikely that it is related to the price increase in the last days. Retailers are returning slowly to get their share of Uptober, perhaps
?Well, I also asked myself the same question, the reason for this increase in fees. I didn't find a logical reason, so maybe it's just that, the simple increase in BTC transactions.
It's a good sign when fees rise for this reason. It is a sign that the market is really moving.
very healthy sign. It is looking better these days my friend
And JJG is of course correct when he says that this could as well take 50 or 100 years because it would indeed be positively ridiculous if bitcoin's market cap would overtake that of gold within 20 years of its existence, considering that gold has thousands of years of history to look back on.
When I mentioned 50-200 years, I was referring to bitcoin reaching 1,000x gold's market cap.
Bitcoin could reach parity with gold's market cap this cycle or next cycle.. that is a much easier target, and surely even bitcoin reaching parity with gold's market cap (which might be in the ballpark of $600k to $700k per BTC) is not even guaranteed to happen, but surely it is not impossible to do or even unrealistic in this cycle.. perhaps even greater than 10% odds for this cycle, just like there perhaps could be odds approaching 0.5% for BTC to reach $2 million this cycle..
I fully agree and I know the reasons why you say that. I think many of the folks here don't grasp the whole picture and every time they compare gold market cap to bitcoin market cap, something inside tells them this isn't possible, parity isn't possible because of this, because of that, because of whatever.
But you are indeed right that there are plenty of reasons to believe it does reach parity, while there is no need to be naive and push any and all skepticism aside. I don't know if you'd perhaps miss the topic, so I leave you a link here of a quick overview that I just put together about bitcoin vs. gold and why parity is not utopian. Would enjoy a comment from you, but I guess no need to mention that
You have the right idea my friend!
I agree with you all the way