So, I decided to take a look at Ubiatar’s Telegram chat after I read that a user was chatting with their CEO, Francesco Raco, and he told him that now the bounty hunters’ request aren’t 12k, now they have increased to 20k!!

A quick recap:
- Before the bounty hunters are 12k
- Now they are 20k
- In the Telegram chat there are less than 13k subscribers
- In the old bounty spreadsheet there were less than 2k people.

So it’s easy to see that Ubiatar and their CEO are lying to everybody, probably they think to be very smart and have a very low consideration of other people’s intelligence…

After I took a look at their Telegram subscribers I found this:




















Those of course are just a part of the screenshots, there literally are hundreds or even thousands of deleted accounts and other accounts with Southeast Asia names without profile picture. So what does it mean? It means that all those accounts are fake and have been bought in packages just to increase the number of the subscribers in the chat, so they are trying to show a lot of people interested in their project when clearly many of them are fake.

This project just gets worse day by day, SCAMMERS!!

So, I decided to take a look at Ubiatar’s Telegram chat after I read that a user was chatting with their CEO, Francesco Raco, and he told him that now the bounty hunters’ request aren’t 12k, now they have increased to 20k!!

A quick recap:
- Before the bounty hunters are 12k
- Now they are 20k
- In the Telegram chat there are less than 13k subscribers
- In the old bounty spreadsheet there were less than 2k people.

So it’s easy to see that Ubiatar and their CEO are lying to everybody, probably they think to be very smart and have a very low consideration of other people’s intelligence…

After I took a look at their Telegram subscribers I found this:




















Those of course are just a part of the screenshots, there literally are hundreds or even thousands of deleted accounts and other accounts with Southeast Asia names without profile picture. So what does it mean? It means that all those accounts are fake and have been bought in packages just to increase the number of the subscribers in the chat, so they are trying to show a lot of people interested in their project when clearly many of them are fake.

This project just gets worse day by day, SCAMMERS!!

Do you wanna speak out? Then leave 1 star here, at their rating, so maybe they wake up when they have the shittiest ranking of the whole store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ubiatarplay

So you are saying you have received almost 12,000 email?! Please, do you really think we're this stupid?

Without the Telegram bounty these are the numbers of the other campaigns:
- Translation: 75 users (accepted: 12)
- Signature: 265 users (accepted: 185)
- Blog and articles: 564 users (accepted: 180)
- Facebook: 632 users (accepted: 588)
- Twitter: 421 users (accepted: 376)
Total: 1957 users (accepted: 1341)

I highly doubt that all the people who took part in the Telegram campaign have sent an email, they will get 1-2 tokens maximum...

Explain better, what are these choices? What exactly did he do wrong?

Actually to all of us the spreadsheets look quite good, with a correct ratio work done / reward, and all the final calculations reach the full amount of tokens so again, explain what's wrong and how it's possible that the data are unverifiable when everything is written in the bounty thread, week by week.

Why don't you want to solve this in a public way? Why keep separate every inquiry and problem of the bounty hunters? Why don't you want to solve this in a public and transparent way?

Can you confirm that you are going to distribute the full amount of UAC you previously promised, so 1.000.000 tokens?

Are you guys in the Telegram chat? They keep hiding themselves behind the "mistakes" of the old bounty manager (of course they don't say exactly what these mistakes are) and, this is ridiculous, they say they can't publish the new spreadsheets due to "privacy reasons". A guy asked what these reasons are and they answered again "for privacy reasons we can not publish data", so they really are like bots!

And this is maybe the funniest part, that guy then asked how it's possible that they have to keep safe those personal info if there was NO KYC process, so they have no info at all of the bounty hunters, and than replied the CEO, with these words, this is his very answer:
thanks for the advice but you have no responsibility in our company.
the chat is made to talk about the project and the ubiatarplay initiatives.
we are handling the emails concerning the bounty disputes.
with a large community this is normal.
now I beg you to be patient and you will also be given an answer.
do not continue to be insistent.
thank you

So again, they don't answer and they imply that if you keep asking you're gonna be banned. Disgusting behavior, these people are very shady!

Guys, this is Ubiatar's Facebook reviews page: https://www.facebook.com/pg/UbiatarPlay/reviews/?ref=page_internal

Why don't we all leave a 1 star review explaining that this project has been a scam since the beginning?! 

We want answers now, not on Monday. What's the problem to simply explain what's going on?! And why hiding the new spreadsheets? There is no transparency at all from the Ubiatar team, these people are shady!

Here we are talking about ICOs that actually made it and reach their caps, not ICOs that failed, that's a completely different situation, perfectly understandable.
And I'm sorry but I don't get the point "because the value of Cryptocurrency is not stable", they pay you anyway with their tokens, they don't have to buy the tokens, they make them. Maybe am I missing something?

So for you people it's ok to say that a bounty campaign will run for 4 weeks and you'll be paid 100 tokens (just as example), then before it finishes they tell you they're gonna extend it for other 6-8 weeks without any extra reward and if you change the signature you'll be disqualified and then, few days before they give you the reward they tell you they decided to give 50% of what they had previously promised? So you worked the triple of the time for half of the reward? Wow, probably you people work for the glory, not for the money, I really admire you and I really hope you can buy a lot of food with that glory!  

I think we should try to see this from a different point of view: do they actually decide these kind of stuff at the end of the bounty (make it longer, reduce the rewards etc) or maybe, I say maybe eh, they decide all this before the bounty begins, they write their "we can do whatever we want" clause and here we go! They cheat a lot of people make them believe there is a short and/or rich campaign so they have a lot of people joining them and then they change everything, and the poor idiots can't do a shit. Am I really the only one who thinks this?

I have just found this article on Steemit and I completely agree with the author: https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@criptomoneta/the-world-of-bounty-scam-qurrex-tokenpay-and-more

Lately the bounty managers and the devs have been doing everything they want thanks to clauses such as "We reserve the right to change, modify, add or remove portions of these terms and conditions at any time without prior notice and you accept and agree to the changes" and the only people who lose money and waste time of course are only the bounty hunters.

Do you agree with the article? Are bounty managers and devs taking too much advantages of their position? Do you think it's correct they have such a big power in order to exploit the bounty hunters?

They are playing with us.

With this attitude you better don't invest.

Yes, you got a great point there! In a certain way BTC is an inspiration too.

I agree with you.

That would be quite stupid, no? 

I agree, for example if you use that address to send BTC to an exchange where you've been verified there is a connection between that address and your name. Of course none of the common people would ever know that, but someone can have access to those kind of info. Being 100% anonymous it's not so easy.

It's hard to say what's gonna be in 1 year, image 10...

A delayed withdraw and you're here screaming scam? Aren't you exaggerating?

I think so. We go down again to 8kish, I hope no more.