Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 44 results by DigiLab
origin-AL, wow, great find, right in haters and spammers face. One to wonder how many of these haters are paid ones, or MA is in their way by him exposing the truth.
And you are correct for the 2018 correction on DOW. It was on his private blog (I had access at the time).
Whoever doubts that, still can check on his private blog, from end of January 2018.
I cannot rely on going back to those blog posts. I know for a fact that Mr A deletes posts. Not often, but he does. What is to stop him from changing them as well?
Through the brief search, there is another post where the number 1044 is being brought up again, clearly. Likely the disconnect is people following MA's opinion, not the number.
This post is actually on the last day of 2015, for yearly closings.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/precious-metals/gold/closings-today-will-be-the-year-end-signals/
I'd like to ask the Pro Armstrongers a few serious questions.
For the rest of you, I know your thoughts about the following so please give Over45, Truth777 and the rest a chance to respond. Thanks
According to various people, Mr Armstrong included, he has a computer named Socrates that can predict market, economy and other changes to the day. If this is so, why at the end of 2015 into Jan./Feb. 2016, did he write at least 3 public blog posts saying that gold would go under $1000.00, while during the time of at least the 3rd one of those blog posts, and after, gold climbed up into June?
Why did he wait until June to say, 'see I told you' and referenced a one sentence item stuffed in among the several paragraphs in the first 'gold under 1000' post, (that may have been there originally, assuming he did not add that at a later time), saying that if gold closed over such and such a number, (which it did at some point), it would be bullish?
If that bullish scenario was in fact coming true, why did he not give his many readers on the public blog, the same ones that he was telling in at least 3 public blog posts that gold was going under 1000, an early heads up and say, 'hey, it's bullish now' , instead of waiting 6 months to point it out after the fact?
These are serious questions and I would like a serious answer if possible please.
Thanks
Angus_P
For the rest of you, I know your thoughts about the following so please give Over45, Truth777 and the rest a chance to respond. Thanks
According to various people, Mr Armstrong included, he has a computer named Socrates that can predict market, economy and other changes to the day. If this is so, why at the end of 2015 into Jan./Feb. 2016, did he write at least 3 public blog posts saying that gold would go under $1000.00, while during the time of at least the 3rd one of those blog posts, and after, gold climbed up into June?
Why did he wait until June to say, 'see I told you' and referenced a one sentence item stuffed in among the several paragraphs in the first 'gold under 1000' post, (that may have been there originally, assuming he did not add that at a later time), saying that if gold closed over such and such a number, (which it did at some point), it would be bullish?
If that bullish scenario was in fact coming true, why did he not give his many readers on the public blog, the same ones that he was telling in at least 3 public blog posts that gold was going under 1000, an early heads up and say, 'hey, it's bullish now' , instead of waiting 6 months to point it out after the fact?
These are serious questions and I would like a serious answer if possible please.
Thanks
Angus_P
Ok, I did research on MA's blog from that time, and I would pull out his following two posts. First is from Dec 25, 2015, where he writes:
"Therefore, a closing ABOVE 1044.50 for 2015 implies that this is not sufficiently weak enough just yet.
This can mean only that 2016 will produce the lowest closing and 2017 will produce the intraday low."
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/precious-metals/gold/gold-the-update/
And this one from Feb 11, 2016:
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/markets-by-sector/precious-metals/gold/gold-the-february-crisis-the-prelude-to-chaos/
He writes: "The low came on the first benchmark right on target at 1045 ($1 from our number at 1044) and was 51.6 months from the 2011 high.
The year-end closing ABOVE 1044 warned that gold was “not as weak as it may appear.”"
He is spot on the number (first sentence from the Dec 25 post), but his interpretation in the second sentence is not correct. He said it many times, he is human as well, and as such, his interpretations are not always correct. Anyone with the real trading experience, understands what MA is saying here.
But the numbers are there, and they were correct. MA himself like every other trader has found in a situations where his human emotions are telling him one thing, but the computer is telling other thing.
And, in such battles computer always wins over MA.
Above is what I found, but what I can tell myself, is that MA was spot on, both the number, and his interpretation, on the Monthly Bullish Reversal, I think it was 1362.
I didn't listen, again human emotion, and I blame myself for that, not someone else. Because once that number (which was out for years, provided by MA) was taken out, after 3 years of ranging, Gold took off.
That would have been very lucrative trade.
Hey Bozos, if you really want to hurt Martin, how about posting updated information from his Private Blog.
That should also show he is not right, and that would be easy for one to notice, as per you.
All this other bs, is just falling back on yourself. You are delusional to think that someone would actually read it, and even less believe it.
That should also show he is not right, and that would be easy for one to notice, as per you.
All this other bs, is just falling back on yourself. You are delusional to think that someone would actually read it, and even less believe it.
psp777, brief, yet so useful, thank you.
Compared to the humongous garbage the other hater bozos are constantly spewing. Bozos, MA beat you, fair and square, crawl back to your holes.
Compared to the humongous garbage the other hater bozos are constantly spewing. Bozos, MA beat you, fair and square, crawl back to your holes.
Basically MA called for a correction - it came. A continued correction down to 22000-21000 if we had closed about 50pts lower on the DOW today...this is where it gets tricky - we will see what he says this weekend. Next week we could continue to sell hard to those levels.
Gold to find support around mid 1400s
Gold to find support around mid 1400s
"Shill" 
Anonymous, you've been COMPLETELY exposed, and yet you keep preaching the same bs, and desperately trying to project your own behavior to others.
And of course, blaming others for your own failures. You don't even have the capacity to realize that all the bs you are throwing, is falling back, just on yourself.
I didn't know about ignore feature of the forum, but now it will come handy. Just hope that Shelby Moore will come back to this forum, or someone like him to join, in order for this thread to be useful again.
p.s. Just tried the Ignore, beautiful.
Anonymous, you've been COMPLETELY exposed, and yet you keep preaching the same bs, and desperately trying to project your own behavior to others.And of course, blaming others for your own failures. You don't even have the capacity to realize that all the bs you are throwing, is falling back, just on yourself.
I didn't know about ignore feature of the forum, but now it will come handy. Just hope that Shelby Moore will come back to this forum, or someone like him to join, in order for this thread to be useful again.
p.s. Just tried the Ignore, beautiful.
Ok, so that is the reason behind spamming this forum, someone's personal frustration with Martin Armstrong.
Btw, the book arrived "Manipulating the world economy", half way through it, it's worth every dollar.
Most (if not all) of the material can be found on Martin's Blog, spread over the course of many years though.
It's being put together in this book, easier for keeping and browsing.
Btw, the book arrived "Manipulating the world economy", half way through it, it's worth every dollar.
Most (if not all) of the material can be found on Martin's Blog, spread over the course of many years though.
It's being put together in this book, easier for keeping and browsing.
I received this private message from Anonymous Coder today:
Quote
Martin Armstrong,
This is all payback.
I requested my money back from your scam. You refused.
Too bad.
I have educated the people, they know that you post at these forums with multiple identities.
They now post at your youtube interviews, they post at amazon.com, they are everywhere.
All I need to do is to watch this unfold now. I don't need multiple identities. It is organic.
The people are even posting in the forums where to complain at Government agencies. I don't need to do anything. I just watch now.
This is all payback.
I requested my money back from your scam. You refused.
Too bad.
I have educated the people, they know that you post at these forums with multiple identities.
They now post at your youtube interviews, they post at amazon.com, they are everywhere.
All I need to do is to watch this unfold now. I don't need multiple identities. It is organic.
The people are even posting in the forums where to complain at Government agencies. I don't need to do anything. I just watch now.
Traxo, there is a problem. You desperately trying to spin that I believe in omniscient Socrates, yet I never claim such thing. Furthermore, I even stay away to comment on it, as I don't have much experience with it.
What is your problem with MA, idk, and I don't care. If it makes you happy to spew bs and hatred on MA, it's your choice. I'll go after the knowledge and understanding, which MA is willing to share.
What is your problem with MA, idk, and I don't care. If it makes you happy to spew bs and hatred on MA, it's your choice. I'll go after the knowledge and understanding, which MA is willing to share.
And his cult member or paid shill who comes to tell us about it:
I've figured the book will sell out, so I was checking regularly. And as soon as it was available, I did order, two copies, one for myself, and other as a gift (to be backup copy as well).
I'll buy mostly whatever writing Armstrong has to sell on the matter of economy and finance, below 100$. And for this book I was ready to pay even more.
I'll buy mostly whatever writing Armstrong has to sell on the matter of economy and finance, below 100$. And for this book I was ready to pay even more.
March 22, 2016
But this guy just doesn't stop to amaze me. I was following Socrates on irregular level, since I didn't understand much in the beginning. But in the same time, as time was allowing, I started to educate myself on the actual modelling that MA is doing. And it's not a trivial thing to understand. Lately I started to have a grasp of what MA is actually doing with his modelling, and I can start to imagine the amount of work that MA has put into it. And from my point of view, it's monumental.
But this guy just doesn't stop to amaze me. I was following Socrates on irregular level, since I didn't understand much in the beginning. But in the same time, as time was allowing, I started to educate myself on the actual modelling that MA is doing. And it's not a trivial thing to understand. Lately I started to have a grasp of what MA is actually doing with his modelling, and I can start to imagine the amount of work that MA has put into it. And from my point of view, it's monumental.
December 25, 2019
No comment on Socrates, no experience with it.
No comment on Socrates, no experience with it.
Traxo, why didn't you quote the whole thing (below), and yet you and alike are blaming Martin for a fraud. I had a basic private blog subscription when it was yearly, before it was switched to monthly.
I was trying to figure out MA modeling at the time, whereas private blog subscription (limited access to Socrates) has not much to do with it.
You and alike are so pathetic, MA is one of the best economists, ever. We are lucky that he is sharing some of his knowledge publicly, and you pity fools are bashing on him???
What is even more ironic, you think that someone believes your spewing of bs and hatred.
I have Investor level for some time now, and yes, there was a change where regional subscriptions have been condensed to a single site membership. My original intention of subscribing was to be a small sign of gratitude for all the work that MA has done (and still doing), and more importantly, that he is willing to share it publicly. I learned (understand more importantly) so much about economics by reading his blog, and my starting point on economics was absolute beginner.
But this guy just doesn't stop to amaze me. I was following Socrates on irregular level, since I didn't understand much in the beginning. But in the same time, as time was allowing, I started to educate myself on the actual modelling that MA is doing. And it's not a trivial thing to understand. Lately I started to have a grasp of what MA is actually doing with his modelling, and I can start to imagine the amount of work that MA has put into it. And from my point of view, it's monumental.
From where I sit now, if I decide to put some money in trading, I wouldn't think twice to subscribe to the Trader level, which is still not available. I would love to put my hands on the information for the Reversals coupled with the Timing Arrays. Since one without the other, doesn't quite provide that much of a view.
If one by subscribing expects to receive straight forward guidance to buy, or sell, then forget about it. I wouldn't recommend to subscribe, since one can get disappointed, and maybe come back and bash on MA.
But, if one puts an effort in order to UNDERSTAND what MA and his modelling is about, then that will separate the men from the boys. Pls be aware though, it's not a trivial process, at least not for me,
.
I'm assuming that information for the Reversals and the Timing Arrays are only available to MA's clients. Also I'm wondering, has maybe MA sometimes in the past published publicly the fixed frequencies of the transverse waves for some of the markets.
But this guy just doesn't stop to amaze me. I was following Socrates on irregular level, since I didn't understand much in the beginning. But in the same time, as time was allowing, I started to educate myself on the actual modelling that MA is doing. And it's not a trivial thing to understand. Lately I started to have a grasp of what MA is actually doing with his modelling, and I can start to imagine the amount of work that MA has put into it. And from my point of view, it's monumental.
From where I sit now, if I decide to put some money in trading, I wouldn't think twice to subscribe to the Trader level, which is still not available. I would love to put my hands on the information for the Reversals coupled with the Timing Arrays. Since one without the other, doesn't quite provide that much of a view.
If one by subscribing expects to receive straight forward guidance to buy, or sell, then forget about it. I wouldn't recommend to subscribe, since one can get disappointed, and maybe come back and bash on MA.
But, if one puts an effort in order to UNDERSTAND what MA and his modelling is about, then that will separate the men from the boys. Pls be aware though, it's not a trivial process, at least not for me,
.I'm assuming that information for the Reversals and the Timing Arrays are only available to MA's clients. Also I'm wondering, has maybe MA sometimes in the past published publicly the fixed frequencies of the transverse waves for some of the markets.
Total, one came at USD102.98, and other USD109.10, Europe and Canada. I don't think that one would be willing to sell you his copy. But I assume there will be ebook available for free download, that's usually the case with other books.
As for trading, I guess I wouldn't pay for Socrates, will stick to common stuff (Fibonacci, ...). Would like to have the numbers of major reversals though. Someone here provided a way to calculate those, haven't looked thoroughly into that yet.
As for trading, I guess I wouldn't pay for Socrates, will stick to common stuff (Fibonacci, ...). Would like to have the numbers of major reversals though. Someone here provided a way to calculate those, haven't looked thoroughly into that yet.
I've figured the book will sell out, so I was checking regularly. And as soon as it was available, I did order, two copies, one for myself, and other as a gift (to be backup copy as well). One should arrive mid January, and the other the end of January (different locations worldwide). I hope it will go through and get the book.
I'll buy mostly whatever writing Armstrong has to sell on the matter of economy and finance, below 100$. And for this book I was ready to pay even more. Through his blog I finally started to understand the economy, and now I'm just laughing to the Austrians, Keynesians, Monetarist, and other academia stuff.
No comment on Socrates, no experience with it.
I'll buy mostly whatever writing Armstrong has to sell on the matter of economy and finance, below 100$. And for this book I was ready to pay even more. Through his blog I finally started to understand the economy, and now I'm just laughing to the Austrians, Keynesians, Monetarist, and other academia stuff.
No comment on Socrates, no experience with it.
trc4949, thank you for providing an input into the private blog. So, on the other side, the USD should go up, let's see.
decipher11, thank you for providing an explanation of the Armstrong's reversal system.
decipher11, thank you for providing an explanation of the Armstrong's reversal system.
Bashing Socrates and Armstrong continues with the same intensity. Who cares, whatever, at least prove yourself useful a bit, and if possible share his latest writings on the private blog?
Waiting for his book to become available on Amazon.
Waiting for his book to become available on Amazon.
So, this forum has turned into a desperate effort of few ignorant fools trying to debunk Martin Armstrong. Can not comment on Socrates and such, but MA is by far the best economists. Noone has come even close to his understanding of the economy. And I'm so grateful that he is sharing portion of his knowledge publicly. Good luck debunking MA, fools.
@bikefront
"If the candle has a lot of volume but not a lot of price movement, this implies a reversal, as it necessarily means that the opposite position is being taken. Think about it. If a stock declines by 0.10% and has a volume of 10,000, but later has a decline of the 0.09% and a volume of 20,000 in that candle, this means there was more buyer mixed in than before. More big boys are entering. This can be seen on all timeframes, but it is super easy to see on the 5 min candle."
Golden, Thank You.
@trulycoined
Thank You for sharing MA private blog, golden as well. Now, hmmm?? Directional change can be within the trend (bull taking it higher, bear taking it lower). I'm not really following DOW in details, but one thing is certain, lots of volatility. One to assume that would come from the chaos which awaits in front. Looking at the bigger picture (US economy only one performing, e.g. today's GDP), there is no real other place for the money to go, as per Armstrong.
He says "between now and the next Monetary Crisis Cycle.", which means USD higher. So, money will go to USD, will go to DOW, even to US Treasuries, and when SHTF, Gold.
"If the candle has a lot of volume but not a lot of price movement, this implies a reversal, as it necessarily means that the opposite position is being taken. Think about it. If a stock declines by 0.10% and has a volume of 10,000, but later has a decline of the 0.09% and a volume of 20,000 in that candle, this means there was more buyer mixed in than before. More big boys are entering. This can be seen on all timeframes, but it is super easy to see on the 5 min candle."
Golden, Thank You.
@trulycoined
Thank You for sharing MA private blog, golden as well. Now, hmmm?? Directional change can be within the trend (bull taking it higher, bear taking it lower). I'm not really following DOW in details, but one thing is certain, lots of volatility. One to assume that would come from the chaos which awaits in front. Looking at the bigger picture (US economy only one performing, e.g. today's GDP), there is no real other place for the money to go, as per Armstrong.
He says "between now and the next Monetary Crisis Cycle.", which means USD higher. So, money will go to USD, will go to DOW, even to US Treasuries, and when SHTF, Gold.
I don't get all this bashing on Armstrong. Before finding out about Armstrong, I was Austrian school of economy. Still though not feeling comfortable, because some of the things were unfolding opposite of what Austrians (or any other economic school for that matter) was preaching. And that's how I found Armstrong, this was the only guy who got the things right, regarding the aftermath of the last GFC. After I found out about him, went back on his blog, and check his previous writings. Following him for few years now, and I don't think there is anyone else close to him, who can explain economy subject better (I give Taleb a credit though). All these economy schools now appear to be Mickey Mouse comparing to Armstrong teachings.
Now, about the trading. Would I use Armstrong for daily trading, more likely that not, I would not, primarily, but rely on other trading tools. His medium, long term predictions, hell yes. And definitely would like to have access to his reversal numbers, on a bigger time scale (weekly and up).
He mentioned few times that he is writing a book. I hope he will finish it and publish it, can't wait for it.
Now, about the trading. Would I use Armstrong for daily trading, more likely that not, I would not, primarily, but rely on other trading tools. His medium, long term predictions, hell yes. And definitely would like to have access to his reversal numbers, on a bigger time scale (weekly and up).
He mentioned few times that he is writing a book. I hope he will finish it and publish it, can't wait for it.