Search content
Sort by
Showing 6 of 6 results by Dodonpa
Re: [GUIDE][AMD][NVIDIA][CPU][XMR]How to Mine Monero / Sumokoin + Miners Downloads ⛏
i would like to try xmr-stak but i dont find a good intensity for a r9 270x, i know is old gpu, but most of the info i found is for cgminer.
with claymore i get max 482h/s and xmr-stak 420 with 888 intensity
with claymore i get max 482h/s and xmr-stak 420 with 888 intensity
Re: [GUIDE][AMD][NVIDIA][CPU][XMR]How to Mine Monero / Sumokoin + Miners Downloads ⛏
Hi!! is normal that the amount of share is very slow compared with monero? i see that the block found is higher in sumokoin, but i get 30 shares in 1 hour, with monero i was reached the same amount in 3-5 min, in my case.
+1
have 6 * Hd7850 with 25% incorrect shares and 2 R9 270 with 10% incorrect shares.
All cards are non overclocked and working ok with 9.7
A solution would be wonderfull
have 6 * Hd7850 with 25% incorrect shares and 2 R9 270 with 10% incorrect shares.
All cards are non overclocked and working ok with 9.7
A solution would be wonderfull
Drop me a PM if you ever want to get rid of your 7850s
hey, what about with your hashrates with the r9 270 hashrate in both version? without overclock of course
Claymore - Possible bug.
With 10.2 Beta I am getting incorrect shares on my two Gigabyte 270 OC (Pitcairn) (non X)
I'm using the stock settings (-h 512) on non-overclocked cards. 9.7 did/does not give incorrect shares.
With 10.2 Beta I am getting incorrect shares on my two Gigabyte 270 OC (Pitcairn) (non X)
I'm using the stock settings (-h 512) on non-overclocked cards. 9.7 did/does not give incorrect shares.
For me, this miner, for the old cards type 7850(1,2gb), 270(x), 280(x) is totally unusable, unfortunately. 15-30% less hash from clay9.7 version and too manny low diff share.
I spend 40 hours of my life trying to install it properly that at least I get at least the same hash rate, but , it's not worth it. 7850 with 1 GB of memory and 7950 remain on clay9.7, the rest on kachur miner
My two 270s get 422 and 456h/s respectively when I engage the overclock settings. No other miner provides me with anything near that.
I have the same gigabyte cards.
9.7 provides me with better hashrates. 860h/s between my two 270 versus 840h/s with 10.2. I'm not running blockchain drivers though on this particular computer, I use this workstation for photo/video editing and I don't know how much the blockchain drivers will affect performance for that.
xfx and msi 270x, claymore 10.2 show me a lot this message:
GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.
i ran a test for the msi with everything in stock -h 512 and get this results:
15:46:07:999 10a4 GPU #0: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 20 compute units
15:46:07:999 10a4 GPU #0 recognized as Radeon 270/270X
15:46:07:999 10a4 card 0, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 160
15:46:07:999 10a4 0 m = 2
15:46:08:421 10a4 GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 512, -dmem 0 (Memory used: 1075MB)
16:13:16:690 12a8 GPU #0: Pitcairn
16:13:16:690 12a8 XMR - Total Speed: 449 H/s, Total Shares: 115, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:26
16:13:16:690 12a8 XMR: GPU0 449 H/s
16:13:16:690 12a8 Incorrect XMR shares: GPU0 16
16:13:16:690 12a8 1 minute average XMR total speed: 446 H/s
with -dmem 1 the miner drop the hashs 376 Hash/s
with the v9.7 the hash with -a 4 was 445 H/s - 461 hash/sol max
i still going to check options for this two r9 270x, if anyone like share any results for this card