Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 88 results by Donho
Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX
Everyone, please help contributing translations for the darkcoin wallet:
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-translating-the-darkcoin-core.3810/
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/darkcoin/
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-translating-the-darkcoin-core.3810/
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/darkcoin/
Bump, we need reviewers for Dutch (100%), German (100%) and Russian (100%).
Translations almost finished, go, go, go: Italian (96%), Protuguese (76%), Vietnamese (68%) and French (58%).
I wonder why there are no translators for Polish (0%), Czech (0%), Chinese (0%), Arabic (0%) or Turkish (0%) yet?
tried to review german but seems that you need special permission to review? I'm on transifex as donho aswell.
Dont you see that "approve" button left of the "save" button in the translator panel?
no, not there. only save and save all
Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX
Everyone, please help contributing translations for the darkcoin wallet:
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-translating-the-darkcoin-core.3810/
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/darkcoin/
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-translating-the-darkcoin-core.3810/
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/darkcoin/
Bump, we need reviewers for Dutch (100%), German (100%) and Russian (100%).
Translations almost finished, go, go, go: Italian (96%), Protuguese (76%), Vietnamese (68%) and French (58%).
I wonder why there are no translators for Polish (0%), Czech (0%), Chinese (0%), Arabic (0%) or Turkish (0%) yet?
tried to review german but seems that you need special permission to review? I'm on transifex as donho aswell.
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | Fork for Masternode Payment
posted this over on DRKcointalk but wanted to get it in here aswell:
I don't know if someone has already suggested this. But I think a really nice feature for the next RC/update would be the option to set a payout address for the MN payments in the cold wallet.
So one has the option to set an address of a hot or another cold wallet to get the masternode payments send to.
To change the address one would obviously need to unlock the cold wallet with the 1000DRK once and then put in a payment address.
Once this is done you would only have to access the cold MN wallet if you want to access the 1000DRK. And you could manage the payments on another wallet.
Thoughts?
I don't know if someone has already suggested this. But I think a really nice feature for the next RC/update would be the option to set a payout address for the MN payments in the cold wallet.
So one has the option to set an address of a hot or another cold wallet to get the masternode payments send to.
To change the address one would obviously need to unlock the cold wallet with the 1000DRK once and then put in a payment address.
Once this is done you would only have to access the cold MN wallet if you want to access the 1000DRK. And you could manage the payments on another wallet.
Thoughts?
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
RC3: Hard Fork on June 20th! Please Update!
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rc3-hard-fork-on-june-20th.1241/
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
i think that a website must be setup, something like betarigs, where you can rent/lease a masternode at a certain price or %.
it could help a lot if this is an official site from the dev team and not someone that can run away with 10-15-20-30 nodes (no offense to DyslecticZombei, i m just saying)
I agree it is not the optimal set up, but is the only one I know that has been successful atm. I've seen a couple more people trying to do this and we've discussed many other options here, but I'm not sure the market is big enough for someone to code the solution.
I would not want the devs involved with this, that could raise a lot of other issues and bring more centralization. I think the market should take care of it once someone comes with the solution to the trust issue.
Plus I've got some very innovative ideas on how to run a trustless pooled masternode I will be releasing more hopefully this weekend after I finish testing.
Bump! Those of us who do not quite have enough DRK for a MN nor enough technological know-how are eager to join ASAP.
I would be EXTREMELY cautious in that endeavour. Not bad mouthing anyone, nor their intentions!
if it'll really be trustless like he said (which would be really awesome) then there's no need for caution.
But as I see it a trustless solution would have to be coded into the Coin by Evan, it's not something a third party could do. Something like allowing a multipart Masternode tx input. At least I can't think of third party trustless solution to this
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
OK mikemikemike WE GOT IT.
Can you guys just agree that you disagree... I don't want to read 5 more pages of you arguing and speculating the price.
THANKS!
Can you guys just agree that you disagree... I don't want to read 5 more pages of you arguing and speculating the price.
THANKS!
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
Once I had thought, it would be nice "if there is rcp command to see whois masternode payee of current block"
Today I have found how to get.
It's already there. no special rcp command needed.
test from testnet
darkcoind getblockcount | xargs darkcoind getblockhash | xargs darkcoind getblock
{
"hash" : "00000000872761db459d3cdb7dadd183bafc052ec3f432d02d7b4742979b7e92",
"confirmations" : 1,
"size" : 394,
"height" : 14496,
"version" : 2,
"merkleroot" : "3d28a066e97574188e10f27cfc0bfbe91d0d39ca56507a47a8bfca776551ff5d",
"tx" : [
"3d28a066e97574188e10f27cfc0bfbe91d0d39ca56507a47a8bfca776551ff5d"
],
"time" : 1401982098,
"nonce" : 5783647,
"bits" : "1d01e59b",
"difficulty" : 0.52716889,
"previousblockhash" : "00000000f5fcba2074957bfd98aeb12cab4b79df340b6bebfb35f12f4631d12c"
}
You see what you know. LOL..
Today I have found how to get.
It's already there. no special rcp command needed.
test from testnet
Quote
darkcoind getblockcount | xargs darkcoind getblockhash | xargs darkcoind getblock
{
"hash" : "00000000872761db459d3cdb7dadd183bafc052ec3f432d02d7b4742979b7e92",
"confirmations" : 1,
"size" : 394,
"height" : 14496,
"version" : 2,
"merkleroot" : "3d28a066e97574188e10f27cfc0bfbe91d0d39ca56507a47a8bfca776551ff5d",
"tx" : [
"3d28a066e97574188e10f27cfc0bfbe91d0d39ca56507a47a8bfca776551ff5d"
],
"time" : 1401982098,
"nonce" : 5783647,
"bits" : "1d01e59b",
"difficulty" : 0.52716889,
"previousblockhash" : "00000000f5fcba2074957bfd98aeb12cab4b79df340b6bebfb35f12f4631d12c"
}
Quote
darkcoind getrawtransaction 3d28a066e97574188e10f27cfc0bfbe91d0d39ca56507a47a8bfca776551ff5d 1
{
"hex" : "01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff2902a038062f503253482f049f8c905308f800000efc000000102f7374726174756d2d736572 7665722f000000000200a7a924030000001976a9143d74a9ccac3688cffbd0e93c3cd94e5131c3f 4a188ac002f6859000000001976a9148da5005f4efa2385c50fcfaac37473b3def8514388ac0000 0000",
"txid" : "3d28a066e97574188e10f27cfc0bfbe91d0d39ca56507a47a8bfca776551ff5d",
"version" : 1,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"coinbase" : "02a038062f503253482f049f8c905308f800000efc000000102f7374726174756d2d73657276657 22f",
"sequence" : 0
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 135.00000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 3d74a9ccac3688cffbd0e93c3cd94e5131c3f4a1 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9143d74a9ccac3688cffbd0e93c3cd94e5131c3f4a188ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mm7uGfNfWZSMgaLM3UruY5wCwt35sJtGEn"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 15.00000000,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 8da5005f4efa2385c50fcfaac37473b3def85143 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9148da5005f4efa2385c50fcfaac37473b3def8514388ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mtRuEbzakYd8vb98szxiHE8unB1mqaXJPY"
]
}
}
],
"blockhash" : "00000000872761db459d3cdb7dadd183bafc052ec3f432d02d7b4742979b7e92",
"confirmations" : 1,
"time" : 1401982098,
"blocktime" : 1401982098
}
{
"hex" : "01000000010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000fffff fff2902a038062f503253482f049f8c905308f800000efc000000102f7374726174756d2d736572 7665722f000000000200a7a924030000001976a9143d74a9ccac3688cffbd0e93c3cd94e5131c3f 4a188ac002f6859000000001976a9148da5005f4efa2385c50fcfaac37473b3def8514388ac0000 0000",
"txid" : "3d28a066e97574188e10f27cfc0bfbe91d0d39ca56507a47a8bfca776551ff5d",
"version" : 1,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"coinbase" : "02a038062f503253482f049f8c905308f800000efc000000102f7374726174756d2d73657276657 22f",
"sequence" : 0
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 135.00000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 3d74a9ccac3688cffbd0e93c3cd94e5131c3f4a1 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9143d74a9ccac3688cffbd0e93c3cd94e5131c3f4a188ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mm7uGfNfWZSMgaLM3UruY5wCwt35sJtGEn"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 15.00000000,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 8da5005f4efa2385c50fcfaac37473b3def85143 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9148da5005f4efa2385c50fcfaac37473b3def8514388ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mtRuEbzakYd8vb98szxiHE8unB1mqaXJPY"
]
}
}
],
"blockhash" : "00000000872761db459d3cdb7dadd183bafc052ec3f432d02d7b4742979b7e92",
"confirmations" : 1,
"time" : 1401982098,
"blocktime" : 1401982098
}
You see what you know. LOL..
nice! could you maybe do a stats page showing which masternode got payed how often?
muchas gracias el presidente!
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
I can't find the exact post, but I remembering Evan saying there would be a limit of 5.
I think he hasn't committed to any number yet.
http://wiki.darkcoin.eu/wiki/FAQ#How_many_Darkcoins_will_be_issued_in_total.3F
Quote
Unlike the number of Bitcoins in which the number is known in advance, Darkcoins have a maximum theoretical limit of approximately 21.3 million coins by 2050 with a slow issuing curve. However the real number of coins can be reduced to something like 16 or 17 million coins in case the hashrate of the network brings the mining reward lower in the near future.
Initially the plan was to have a theoretical limit of approximately 84 million coins, however due to the initial block reward formula which was aggressively diminishing block rewards without a minimum reward set, it would be near impossible to have more than 10 million coins issued.
Minimum block reward is now set at 5 DRKs per block and instead of using block halving every 4 years, Darkcoin employs a far smoother 7% annual decrease in coins issued per block. The minimum block reward was achieved on May 15th 2014.
Bottom line answer is: The theoretical maximum is close to 22mn but in practice we might not see more than 16-17mn coins due to tremendous difficulty increase very early in the coin's life.
Initially the plan was to have a theoretical limit of approximately 84 million coins, however due to the initial block reward formula which was aggressively diminishing block rewards without a minimum reward set, it would be near impossible to have more than 10 million coins issued.
Minimum block reward is now set at 5 DRKs per block and instead of using block halving every 4 years, Darkcoin employs a far smoother 7% annual decrease in coins issued per block. The minimum block reward was achieved on May 15th 2014.
Bottom line answer is: The theoretical maximum is close to 22mn but in practice we might not see more than 16-17mn coins due to tremendous difficulty increase very early in the coin's life.
I think they were talking about the max number of tickets per Masternode not the minimum block reward^^
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
Can you help test?
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-test-rc2-forking-issues.1009/
https://darkcointalk.org/threads/help-test-rc2-forking-issues.1009/
statum connection failed. (stratum pool)
// yes i opened an account on the testpool
// yes i edited my -u and -p
same here.
also would be nice to get precompiled forkfix-testnet darkcoind
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
If you really want to run a masternode although you aren't too much into the security stuff (which I advise against!) then you at least might wanna use 2-FA for your SSH access.
Here's a fool-proof (well, there's always a greater fool!) tutorial on how to do that on Ubuntu. http://www.howtogeek.com/121650/how-to-secure-ssh-with-google-authenticators-two-factor-authentication/
edit: btw, the Android Google Authenticator isn't open source anymore! You can download "OTP Authenticator" which is a fork of the last Google Authenticator version that was open source. There's the binaries on the play store, the source is hosted on sourceforge iirc.
Here's a fool-proof (well, there's always a greater fool!) tutorial on how to do that on Ubuntu. http://www.howtogeek.com/121650/how-to-secure-ssh-with-google-authenticators-two-factor-authentication/
edit: btw, the Android Google Authenticator isn't open source anymore! You can download "OTP Authenticator" which is a fork of the last Google Authenticator version that was open source. There's the binaries on the play store, the source is hosted on sourceforge iirc.
tried this, but apparently it doesn't work together with pubkey authentification
pubkey Auth just skips the 2FA. Does anyone know how to get this working together?
I suppose that pubkey is as secure as goole authenticator.
I keep my pubkey on usb stick so when need I insert it for 5sec and go forward...
But BOTH combined is an extra level of security! I figured out how (see my post here or https://darkcointalk.org/threads/best-ways-to-secure-your-masternode.838/#post-5731)
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
I'm wondering if those of you with Masternodes are more interested in going with Evan's new proposal so you can start getting paid, or would you rather Evan take more time to get the original implementation, or something similar working? I'm curious to know, I know where I stand (I'd rather he take his time) but don't know where you all stand 
Please comment 
Please comment take time and do it right with with another well prepared and large testnet tested hardfork (more testnet pools maybe)
I'm no fan of relying on the miners to do the right thing
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
If you really want to run a masternode although you aren't too much into the security stuff (which I advise against!) then you at least might wanna use 2-FA for your SSH access.
Here's a fool-proof (well, there's always a greater fool!) tutorial on how to do that on Ubuntu. http://www.howtogeek.com/121650/how-to-secure-ssh-with-google-authenticators-two-factor-authentication/
edit: btw, the Android Google Authenticator isn't open source anymore! You can download "OTP Authenticator" which is a fork of the last Google Authenticator version that was open source. There's the binaries on the play store, the source is hosted on sourceforge iirc.
Here's a fool-proof (well, there's always a greater fool!) tutorial on how to do that on Ubuntu. http://www.howtogeek.com/121650/how-to-secure-ssh-with-google-authenticators-two-factor-authentication/
edit: btw, the Android Google Authenticator isn't open source anymore! You can download "OTP Authenticator" which is a fork of the last Google Authenticator version that was open source. There's the binaries on the play store, the source is hosted on sourceforge iirc.
tried this, but apparently it doesn't work together with pubkey authentification
pubkey Auth just skips the 2FA. Does anyone know how to get this working together?
got it kind of working. If you have pubkeys auth already enabled and follow this simple guide posted by hartvercoint and add "AuthenticationMethods publickey,keyboard-interactive" to the sshd_config you need the pubkey then the password and then the 2FA code
Super secure!
But I kind of want to eliminate the password and just have pubkey and 2FA
If Anyone knows how. Shoot it!
find the PasswordAuthentication line and change it to no #you might need to uncomment it as well
I have
PasswordAuthentication no
but I guess using
AuthenticationMethods publickey,keyboard-interactive
overwrites that
I'm not sure if it's possible to use 2FA without a password
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
If you really want to run a masternode although you aren't too much into the security stuff (which I advise against!) then you at least might wanna use 2-FA for your SSH access.
Here's a fool-proof (well, there's always a greater fool!) tutorial on how to do that on Ubuntu. http://www.howtogeek.com/121650/how-to-secure-ssh-with-google-authenticators-two-factor-authentication/
edit: btw, the Android Google Authenticator isn't open source anymore! You can download "OTP Authenticator" which is a fork of the last Google Authenticator version that was open source. There's the binaries on the play store, the source is hosted on sourceforge iirc.
Here's a fool-proof (well, there's always a greater fool!) tutorial on how to do that on Ubuntu. http://www.howtogeek.com/121650/how-to-secure-ssh-with-google-authenticators-two-factor-authentication/
edit: btw, the Android Google Authenticator isn't open source anymore! You can download "OTP Authenticator" which is a fork of the last Google Authenticator version that was open source. There's the binaries on the play store, the source is hosted on sourceforge iirc.
tried this, but apparently it doesn't work together with pubkey authentification
pubkey Auth just skips the 2FA. Does anyone know how to get this working together?
got it kind of working. If you have pubkeys auth already enabled and follow this simple guide posted by hartvercoint and add "AuthenticationMethods publickey,keyboard-interactive" to the sshd_config you need the pubkey then the password and then the 2FA code
Super secure!
But I kind of want to eliminate the password and just have pubkey and 2FA
If Anyone knows how. Shoot it!
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
If you really want to run a masternode although you aren't too much into the security stuff (which I advise against!) then you at least might wanna use 2-FA for your SSH access.
Here's a fool-proof (well, there's always a greater fool!) tutorial on how to do that on Ubuntu. http://www.howtogeek.com/121650/how-to-secure-ssh-with-google-authenticators-two-factor-authentication/
edit: btw, the Android Google Authenticator isn't open source anymore! You can download "OTP Authenticator" which is a fork of the last Google Authenticator version that was open source. There's the binaries on the play store, the source is hosted on sourceforge iirc.
Here's a fool-proof (well, there's always a greater fool!) tutorial on how to do that on Ubuntu. http://www.howtogeek.com/121650/how-to-secure-ssh-with-google-authenticators-two-factor-authentication/
edit: btw, the Android Google Authenticator isn't open source anymore! You can download "OTP Authenticator" which is a fork of the last Google Authenticator version that was open source. There's the binaries on the play store, the source is hosted on sourceforge iirc.
tried this, but apparently it doesn't work together with pubkey authentification
pubkey Auth just skips the 2FA. Does anyone know how to get this working together?
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
Anybody else raise a bit of an eyebrow at the "no forks" part of Evan's post? If that can be done, then why did we try to hard fork in the first place? Was the original method really thought through and the best option to pay masternodes selected? Or is there some compromise in implementing forkless payments that is now being ignored becuase of the chaos over the last few days? And then there is the obvious increasing of the masternode incentive (20%, multiple tickets) which I guess is fine... but is also a convenient price lifeboat.
My wallet has remained closed during this mishap and I have no plans to dump any part of my modest stash, but I have a lot of questions right now. Anybody that has any insight (Evan himself is best, but that is hoping for too much) that could answer some of these questions would be appreciated.
Or maybe I am being too skeptical and nobody else sees anything odd here...
My wallet has remained closed during this mishap and I have no plans to dump any part of my modest stash, but I have a lot of questions right now. Anybody that has any insight (Evan himself is best, but that is hoping for too much) that could answer some of these questions would be appreciated.
Or maybe I am being too skeptical and nobody else sees anything odd here...
no you're not alone. I think it's a bit odd too. Evan could definitely improve on his communication with the community.
But DRK is still the best anonymous coin out there... so let's hope the best
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
[18:57] <+Propulsion> *IMPORTANT* If you run a p2pool node, shut it down as well as darkcoind!
I guess that's why http://poolhash.org/ is down aswellRe: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
and this current paid address.
Some paid twice, mean we need cline update(9.3/4 to 9.4.8, 10.7/8 to 10.8.
.http://drk.poolhash.org/subver.html
That's the one I mean. Do you have a updated version on the website? If I click the link I don't see it... Maybe it's a cache problem?
I will make a page..
Code:
3 Xhaw5rS9AN6NAkpBbfkpWZ9f2pqeusB2Wh
2 XxvUt8uthJ3gLvcRw5Qg8fDtTkAEjBCuxw
2 XutJNep69F3fDeLJsPMw44Td2vLkf72LA6
2 Xuf4Cg1uCrpBDYeYELCgqE6e3THfbEQu9S
2 XrtMATyBVTjvQSUyoz1dDEgnVej8o5H65a
2 XooXgVQncHDKnortU1D9rPSC78Cfe5ZwFP
2 Xmtvo757xyZGPHpD5mgJugMxqKbUsN3tLU
2 XiYu7eftWpiS38X5Hk4jNoA1vtjGHynYQE
2 XgB8a5joFQDTzU6iMM3z2NjZpBw6sogABb
2 XdxpXi6AxaivDotpEp51GVF4ubdv9h7ipT
1 XyYkbhvnFg48dH79MAKXJVQ1w8J5vaUNiA
1 XxVyEi8VTrA3njn8GbwdTn39UBvX6WKmEd
1 Xw16ZrA4eRpNfdv4nCMydC4hx8tjze6sVa
1 XvSRJEJJxEEpFfF7Hd6Mjt2XarE45959uF
1 XuyYW6RAoHNsYJhvnxR6GApgKCEJt72KCE
1 XuXhPw7hqAV6s6g7jWte6rgjiLRbJc5Rzr
1 XtyXgzyAkyBNwyUBp3VKkyDstp39Q5Ntiq
1 XtSDch4aQKcPzB1GCGTBndVj42aSa3jS7K
1 XtNHwPW7fhYwoqip2ifT1XEYdaAKWyTauy
1 Xsy7gWpzZ9YzSBFnv2cpzsHYCAwjkUh9RZ
1 XsWdw5crBm5RUETB1DE4zF6Rh48ah6KpEQ
1 XsrNi8Pney4chhF8MkYRLWUyAgxniVwLGx
1 XsKRWcxj97Ft5yCFFGZpSnQ5DN8GAMuUsi
1 XsKmZHmvrWcnigt1PsTtBt6tCX1y64rEXe
1 XsjU4wWJA8zzW2LAxarKi8V4uX2Musmrbs
1 XsfpS5Qdmct3sDXpHxQ6tXwD9qfbDbNoUc
1 XsEwtJJC8nBAhNgNWTVUK9C9kZQGE9shyE
1 XrnsveU9ADMoNHsiHDwGpAhTHmAFC6njmo
1 XrKWRRb6uYznoScEh2NXRw8ythvAqwGFsR
1 XrgrCXZFhLNfyR4UKv9YT19CK7YVEPrc8Y
1 XoY7UT5ZrBeD1Nkn9xzeJhhbTGeXSEpjfk
1 XoAhBoEDC4TpqvQNY9LoYo1HvJqdgzhwWA
1 Xo4Tu1Bzijki91wJootaV5rqVRx7uxdzVw
1 XnW3oUQHkc6PAUAqPdkPTcxZGsUzeCD8Rc
1 XmQafiUXBp5tfrE347u2fC2onxBxkNZQA6
1 XmjzJvpXdQir6CxhA1eb79DTEkMMjFRHBS
1 XmDgDBfPNLTndGt4NVwyneUms9szPnq2QQ
1 Xjgg5YDHeFbbZGJsU5wyTBjMPXRzqKL359
1 XiW9uT2rYjwmWh8mHQME1cPs5eWWefTTph
1 XhPweVoEC9BLCWGJnCUonYoL7iC4eq5Hwy
1 Xh8dySWErahps3qvZCZskWPMo95fwMvTNc
1 XfgCNAJx9gfC9o2414jwcZNtfBViVzic1r
1 Xf7wJd4LeMrRsvDt3sKSRPjPoG3qzhYJi4
1 XegGsk3M7Wv7LtiCHPNJJv4sEYzgTgPtHp
1 XeddSFMKCvmMi2Rz5PEPcret5LLzw33FuW
1 Xe9i4eCsGBxF88HwcR2mekGFcctks1ZRt5
1 XdNGaMzeiJp6H4TgTz2a8PAS7NPSqBYTd6
1 XdhnKkjFxGioVqdB7Y7ZXecMx1iCHo6zDv
1 XddtzSZUwHxQFRd5Fz4y8rDkUY6TVmEqg5
1 XaxP4YRYDpKkM8AKhVSbDsAAK7xtqJzYpa
2 XxvUt8uthJ3gLvcRw5Qg8fDtTkAEjBCuxw
2 XutJNep69F3fDeLJsPMw44Td2vLkf72LA6
2 Xuf4Cg1uCrpBDYeYELCgqE6e3THfbEQu9S
2 XrtMATyBVTjvQSUyoz1dDEgnVej8o5H65a
2 XooXgVQncHDKnortU1D9rPSC78Cfe5ZwFP
2 Xmtvo757xyZGPHpD5mgJugMxqKbUsN3tLU
2 XiYu7eftWpiS38X5Hk4jNoA1vtjGHynYQE
2 XgB8a5joFQDTzU6iMM3z2NjZpBw6sogABb
2 XdxpXi6AxaivDotpEp51GVF4ubdv9h7ipT
1 XyYkbhvnFg48dH79MAKXJVQ1w8J5vaUNiA
1 XxVyEi8VTrA3njn8GbwdTn39UBvX6WKmEd
1 Xw16ZrA4eRpNfdv4nCMydC4hx8tjze6sVa
1 XvSRJEJJxEEpFfF7Hd6Mjt2XarE45959uF
1 XuyYW6RAoHNsYJhvnxR6GApgKCEJt72KCE
1 XuXhPw7hqAV6s6g7jWte6rgjiLRbJc5Rzr
1 XtyXgzyAkyBNwyUBp3VKkyDstp39Q5Ntiq
1 XtSDch4aQKcPzB1GCGTBndVj42aSa3jS7K
1 XtNHwPW7fhYwoqip2ifT1XEYdaAKWyTauy
1 Xsy7gWpzZ9YzSBFnv2cpzsHYCAwjkUh9RZ
1 XsWdw5crBm5RUETB1DE4zF6Rh48ah6KpEQ
1 XsrNi8Pney4chhF8MkYRLWUyAgxniVwLGx
1 XsKRWcxj97Ft5yCFFGZpSnQ5DN8GAMuUsi
1 XsKmZHmvrWcnigt1PsTtBt6tCX1y64rEXe
1 XsjU4wWJA8zzW2LAxarKi8V4uX2Musmrbs
1 XsfpS5Qdmct3sDXpHxQ6tXwD9qfbDbNoUc
1 XsEwtJJC8nBAhNgNWTVUK9C9kZQGE9shyE
1 XrnsveU9ADMoNHsiHDwGpAhTHmAFC6njmo
1 XrKWRRb6uYznoScEh2NXRw8ythvAqwGFsR
1 XrgrCXZFhLNfyR4UKv9YT19CK7YVEPrc8Y
1 XoY7UT5ZrBeD1Nkn9xzeJhhbTGeXSEpjfk
1 XoAhBoEDC4TpqvQNY9LoYo1HvJqdgzhwWA
1 Xo4Tu1Bzijki91wJootaV5rqVRx7uxdzVw
1 XnW3oUQHkc6PAUAqPdkPTcxZGsUzeCD8Rc
1 XmQafiUXBp5tfrE347u2fC2onxBxkNZQA6
1 XmjzJvpXdQir6CxhA1eb79DTEkMMjFRHBS
1 XmDgDBfPNLTndGt4NVwyneUms9szPnq2QQ
1 Xjgg5YDHeFbbZGJsU5wyTBjMPXRzqKL359
1 XiW9uT2rYjwmWh8mHQME1cPs5eWWefTTph
1 XhPweVoEC9BLCWGJnCUonYoL7iC4eq5Hwy
1 Xh8dySWErahps3qvZCZskWPMo95fwMvTNc
1 XfgCNAJx9gfC9o2414jwcZNtfBViVzic1r
1 Xf7wJd4LeMrRsvDt3sKSRPjPoG3qzhYJi4
1 XegGsk3M7Wv7LtiCHPNJJv4sEYzgTgPtHp
1 XeddSFMKCvmMi2Rz5PEPcret5LLzw33FuW
1 Xe9i4eCsGBxF88HwcR2mekGFcctks1ZRt5
1 XdNGaMzeiJp6H4TgTz2a8PAS7NPSqBYTd6
1 XdhnKkjFxGioVqdB7Y7ZXecMx1iCHo6zDv
1 XddtzSZUwHxQFRd5Fz4y8rDkUY6TVmEqg5
1 XaxP4YRYDpKkM8AKhVSbDsAAK7xtqJzYpa
Look at the 4th address from down, how can it be that it got paid without the 1000 drk on the MN?
You can setup a local / remote setup for an MN - I believe that is probably why. You can use the local wallet that has 1000DRK to "promote" the remote wallet to an MN - so you don't have to store the 1000DRK on the remote wallet.
Again - I'm pretty sure - I have this setup right now.
But the payment would still be to the address that holds the 1k DRK. At least that was the case on testnet!
Did you already receive a payment with your local remote setup? Have mine running but nothing so far
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
We got Already
89.7% of the RC2 nodes on 10.8.8
and
60.9% of stable nodes on 9.4.8
see http://poolhash.org/subver.html
Thought x.x.8 should fix the voting. But still the Masternode payments are unregular.
Are some miners/pools still on the old client? Or why is the voting not fixed?
Everyone UPDATE to the newest version!
Anyone know what has changed?
it fixed the fork
89.7% of the RC2 nodes on 10.8.8
and
60.9% of stable nodes on 9.4.8
see http://poolhash.org/subver.html
Thought x.x.8 should fix the voting. But still the Masternode payments are unregular.
Are some miners/pools still on the old client? Or why is the voting not fixed?
Everyone UPDATE to the newest version!
*** PLEASE UPDATE TO 9.4.8 OR 10.8.8 ***
Stable (v0.9.4.8 )
Windows
Source
Release Candidates (v0.10.8.8 )
Windows RC2 (Darksend)
Ubuntu GUI RC2 (Darksend)
Ubuntu daemon RC2 (Darksend)
Stable (v0.9.4.8 )
Windows
Source
Release Candidates (v0.10.8.8 )
Windows RC2 (Darksend)
Ubuntu GUI RC2 (Darksend)
Ubuntu daemon RC2 (Darksend)
Anyone know what has changed?
it fixed the fork
Re: [ANN][DRK] DarkCoin | First Anonymous Coin | First X11 | First DGW | ASIC Resistant
and this current paid address.
Some paid twice, mean we need cline update(9.3/4 to 9.4.8, 10.7/8 to 10.8.
.http://drk.poolhash.org/subver.html
That's the one I mean. Do you have a updated version on the website? If I click the link I don't see it... Maybe it's a cache problem?
I will make a page..
Code:
3 Xhaw5rS9AN6NAkpBbfkpWZ9f2pqeusB2Wh
2 XxvUt8uthJ3gLvcRw5Qg8fDtTkAEjBCuxw
2 XutJNep69F3fDeLJsPMw44Td2vLkf72LA6
2 Xuf4Cg1uCrpBDYeYELCgqE6e3THfbEQu9S
2 XrtMATyBVTjvQSUyoz1dDEgnVej8o5H65a
2 XooXgVQncHDKnortU1D9rPSC78Cfe5ZwFP
2 Xmtvo757xyZGPHpD5mgJugMxqKbUsN3tLU
2 XiYu7eftWpiS38X5Hk4jNoA1vtjGHynYQE
2 XgB8a5joFQDTzU6iMM3z2NjZpBw6sogABb
2 XdxpXi6AxaivDotpEp51GVF4ubdv9h7ipT
1 XyYkbhvnFg48dH79MAKXJVQ1w8J5vaUNiA
1 XxVyEi8VTrA3njn8GbwdTn39UBvX6WKmEd
1 Xw16ZrA4eRpNfdv4nCMydC4hx8tjze6sVa
1 XvSRJEJJxEEpFfF7Hd6Mjt2XarE45959uF
1 XuyYW6RAoHNsYJhvnxR6GApgKCEJt72KCE
1 XuXhPw7hqAV6s6g7jWte6rgjiLRbJc5Rzr
1 XtyXgzyAkyBNwyUBp3VKkyDstp39Q5Ntiq
1 XtSDch4aQKcPzB1GCGTBndVj42aSa3jS7K
1 XtNHwPW7fhYwoqip2ifT1XEYdaAKWyTauy
1 Xsy7gWpzZ9YzSBFnv2cpzsHYCAwjkUh9RZ
1 XsWdw5crBm5RUETB1DE4zF6Rh48ah6KpEQ
1 XsrNi8Pney4chhF8MkYRLWUyAgxniVwLGx
1 XsKRWcxj97Ft5yCFFGZpSnQ5DN8GAMuUsi
1 XsKmZHmvrWcnigt1PsTtBt6tCX1y64rEXe
1 XsjU4wWJA8zzW2LAxarKi8V4uX2Musmrbs
1 XsfpS5Qdmct3sDXpHxQ6tXwD9qfbDbNoUc
1 XsEwtJJC8nBAhNgNWTVUK9C9kZQGE9shyE
1 XrnsveU9ADMoNHsiHDwGpAhTHmAFC6njmo
1 XrKWRRb6uYznoScEh2NXRw8ythvAqwGFsR
1 XrgrCXZFhLNfyR4UKv9YT19CK7YVEPrc8Y
1 XoY7UT5ZrBeD1Nkn9xzeJhhbTGeXSEpjfk
1 XoAhBoEDC4TpqvQNY9LoYo1HvJqdgzhwWA
1 Xo4Tu1Bzijki91wJootaV5rqVRx7uxdzVw
1 XnW3oUQHkc6PAUAqPdkPTcxZGsUzeCD8Rc
1 XmQafiUXBp5tfrE347u2fC2onxBxkNZQA6
1 XmjzJvpXdQir6CxhA1eb79DTEkMMjFRHBS
1 XmDgDBfPNLTndGt4NVwyneUms9szPnq2QQ
1 Xjgg5YDHeFbbZGJsU5wyTBjMPXRzqKL359
1 XiW9uT2rYjwmWh8mHQME1cPs5eWWefTTph
1 XhPweVoEC9BLCWGJnCUonYoL7iC4eq5Hwy
1 Xh8dySWErahps3qvZCZskWPMo95fwMvTNc
1 XfgCNAJx9gfC9o2414jwcZNtfBViVzic1r
1 Xf7wJd4LeMrRsvDt3sKSRPjPoG3qzhYJi4
1 XegGsk3M7Wv7LtiCHPNJJv4sEYzgTgPtHp
1 XeddSFMKCvmMi2Rz5PEPcret5LLzw33FuW
1 Xe9i4eCsGBxF88HwcR2mekGFcctks1ZRt5
1 XdNGaMzeiJp6H4TgTz2a8PAS7NPSqBYTd6
1 XdhnKkjFxGioVqdB7Y7ZXecMx1iCHo6zDv
1 XddtzSZUwHxQFRd5Fz4y8rDkUY6TVmEqg5
1 XaxP4YRYDpKkM8AKhVSbDsAAK7xtqJzYpa
2 XxvUt8uthJ3gLvcRw5Qg8fDtTkAEjBCuxw
2 XutJNep69F3fDeLJsPMw44Td2vLkf72LA6
2 Xuf4Cg1uCrpBDYeYELCgqE6e3THfbEQu9S
2 XrtMATyBVTjvQSUyoz1dDEgnVej8o5H65a
2 XooXgVQncHDKnortU1D9rPSC78Cfe5ZwFP
2 Xmtvo757xyZGPHpD5mgJugMxqKbUsN3tLU
2 XiYu7eftWpiS38X5Hk4jNoA1vtjGHynYQE
2 XgB8a5joFQDTzU6iMM3z2NjZpBw6sogABb
2 XdxpXi6AxaivDotpEp51GVF4ubdv9h7ipT
1 XyYkbhvnFg48dH79MAKXJVQ1w8J5vaUNiA
1 XxVyEi8VTrA3njn8GbwdTn39UBvX6WKmEd
1 Xw16ZrA4eRpNfdv4nCMydC4hx8tjze6sVa
1 XvSRJEJJxEEpFfF7Hd6Mjt2XarE45959uF
1 XuyYW6RAoHNsYJhvnxR6GApgKCEJt72KCE
1 XuXhPw7hqAV6s6g7jWte6rgjiLRbJc5Rzr
1 XtyXgzyAkyBNwyUBp3VKkyDstp39Q5Ntiq
1 XtSDch4aQKcPzB1GCGTBndVj42aSa3jS7K
1 XtNHwPW7fhYwoqip2ifT1XEYdaAKWyTauy
1 Xsy7gWpzZ9YzSBFnv2cpzsHYCAwjkUh9RZ
1 XsWdw5crBm5RUETB1DE4zF6Rh48ah6KpEQ
1 XsrNi8Pney4chhF8MkYRLWUyAgxniVwLGx
1 XsKRWcxj97Ft5yCFFGZpSnQ5DN8GAMuUsi
1 XsKmZHmvrWcnigt1PsTtBt6tCX1y64rEXe
1 XsjU4wWJA8zzW2LAxarKi8V4uX2Musmrbs
1 XsfpS5Qdmct3sDXpHxQ6tXwD9qfbDbNoUc
1 XsEwtJJC8nBAhNgNWTVUK9C9kZQGE9shyE
1 XrnsveU9ADMoNHsiHDwGpAhTHmAFC6njmo
1 XrKWRRb6uYznoScEh2NXRw8ythvAqwGFsR
1 XrgrCXZFhLNfyR4UKv9YT19CK7YVEPrc8Y
1 XoY7UT5ZrBeD1Nkn9xzeJhhbTGeXSEpjfk
1 XoAhBoEDC4TpqvQNY9LoYo1HvJqdgzhwWA
1 Xo4Tu1Bzijki91wJootaV5rqVRx7uxdzVw
1 XnW3oUQHkc6PAUAqPdkPTcxZGsUzeCD8Rc
1 XmQafiUXBp5tfrE347u2fC2onxBxkNZQA6
1 XmjzJvpXdQir6CxhA1eb79DTEkMMjFRHBS
1 XmDgDBfPNLTndGt4NVwyneUms9szPnq2QQ
1 Xjgg5YDHeFbbZGJsU5wyTBjMPXRzqKL359
1 XiW9uT2rYjwmWh8mHQME1cPs5eWWefTTph
1 XhPweVoEC9BLCWGJnCUonYoL7iC4eq5Hwy
1 Xh8dySWErahps3qvZCZskWPMo95fwMvTNc
1 XfgCNAJx9gfC9o2414jwcZNtfBViVzic1r
1 Xf7wJd4LeMrRsvDt3sKSRPjPoG3qzhYJi4
1 XegGsk3M7Wv7LtiCHPNJJv4sEYzgTgPtHp
1 XeddSFMKCvmMi2Rz5PEPcret5LLzw33FuW
1 Xe9i4eCsGBxF88HwcR2mekGFcctks1ZRt5
1 XdNGaMzeiJp6H4TgTz2a8PAS7NPSqBYTd6
1 XdhnKkjFxGioVqdB7Y7ZXecMx1iCHo6zDv
1 XddtzSZUwHxQFRd5Fz4y8rDkUY6TVmEqg5
1 XaxP4YRYDpKkM8AKhVSbDsAAK7xtqJzYpa
cool thanks a lot!
so one lucky bastard got already paid 3 times
and overall 50 different MN got paid so far out of roughly 300