Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 24 results by DrDolittle
Re: [PRE-ANN] Blacknet (formerly BlackCoin) | Original research | PoS | No ICO
Re: [PRE-ANN] Blacknet (formerly BlackCoin) | Original research | PoS | No ICO
Do not use the name "blacknet".、
"Black" is not a good word in many cultures.
"Black" is not a good word in many cultures.
Any good ideas?
Re: [PRE-ANN] Blacknet (formerly BlackCoin) | Original research | PoS | No ICO
In the latter case, the fact that obtaining Ercoin via burning will also mean obtaining Blacknet and vice versa may mean that more people in total will hold both currencies, which may result in greater adoption. On the other hand, if people are not allowed to choose between the two currencies, then it may form an incentive to not purchase BlackCoin at all, wait until the launch of the currency theyre interested in and purchase it on an exchange. In particular it may therefore result in a lower value of BLK burnt/snapshotted and therefore lower perceived value of both currencies.
Merged burning (allowing the same burned BLKs to participate both in Blacknet and Ercoin distribution) may form an interesting marketing opportunity, but so may another alternatives.
Weighing the pros and cons above, Im currently leaning toward 1 blackcoin = 1 blacknet or 1 ercoin.
Merged burning (allowing the same burned BLKs to participate both in Blacknet and Ercoin distribution) may form an interesting marketing opportunity, but so may another alternatives.
Weighing the pros and cons above, Im currently leaning toward 1 blackcoin = 1 blacknet or 1 ercoin.
I think the market showed that it's ready to abuse all three projects if we go for 1 blackcoin = 1 blackcoin + 1 blacknet + 1 ercoin.
So, explicit choice via burning seems to be the most fair option.
Re: [PRE-ANN] Blacknet (formerly BlackCoin) | Original research | PoS | No ICO
Since Ercoin is going to be distributed via BlackCoin burning, it would be interesting to know the date of the blockchain snapshot for the purpose of BlackNet distribution. If it happens during the burning period, then the two will interfere.
I see two possible outcomes:
1 BlackCoin = 1 Blacknet + 1 Ercoin
1 BlackCoin = 1 Blacknet or 1 Ercoin
In which one are you interested?
I would prefer NOT to see a reduction in the overall supply of Blacknet, therefore Blacknet snapshot before Ercoin/Blackcoin "swap and burn" opportunity.
"1 BlackCoin = 1 Blacknet + 1 Ercoin"
It's assumed here I think that Blackcoin won't need to be burned to receive Blacknet tokens.
Burning is inevitable
Re: [PRE-ANN] Blacknet (formerly BlackCoin) | Original research | PoS | No ICO
Since Ercoin is going to be distributed via BlackCoin burning, it would be interesting to know the date of the blockchain snapshot for the purpose of BlackNet distribution. If it happens during the burning period, then the two will interfere.
I see two possible outcomes:
1 BlackCoin = 1 Blacknet + 1 Ercoin
1 BlackCoin = 1 Blacknet or 1 Ercoin
In which one are you interested?
Re: [PRE-ANN] Blacknet (formerly BlackCoin) | PoS | No ICO | Snapshot
⭐ Merited by STT (1)
Code:
B8gZqgY4r2RoEdqYk3QsAqFckyf9pRHN6i
Code:
24 feb 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvtUrjfnSnA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvtUrjfnSnA
Code:
IEQG/EVu9xvNcuyWlYe6p4r7hUTR0L6FV34DJu+c8NU/CAb2nns8W6c7ZW0zm5+YZIQUsdSXvMcNcEuxfQ3OsQM=
Re: [PRE-ANN] Blacknet (formerly BlackCoin) | PoS | No ICO | Snapshot
Where can I buy Blacknet?
Wait for a good opportunity to buy BLK, then wait for the snapshot.That simple
And don't listen to FUD from mutineers like me is not me, or snapshot was already secretly done...
Wallet update v1.2.5
It's just a few small fixes since previous release.
It is the final update of original wallet. Future developments will move BlackCoin to a new blockchain.
It's just a few small fixes since previous release.
It is the final update of original wallet. Future developments will move BlackCoin to a new blockchain.
Does Blackcoin have BIP65 and OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY?
Yes https://github.com/CoinBlack/blackcoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1423
Account is a reusable address with its downsides.
is it this?https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Design-Rationale#accounts-and-not-utxos
Yep
After reading about the issue of address reuse I think it wouldn't be that bad if accounts were used more (with different addresses). If you mean the same type of accounts here.
Account is a reusable address with its downsides.
I'm working on v5 
Some progress there... It needs accounts, as opposed to UTXOs.
But there's a difficult question: UTXOs and accounts, or only accounts?
Re: [ANN] BlackCoin (BC) | Старт 24 Фев | scrypt | PoS | Без премайна
Это о BlackCoin Lore, новом кошельке на основе Bitcoin Core 0.12
Could blackcoin use the masternodes idea to attract more investors and rise the price 
The masternodes idea is sort of proof-of-stake
Quote
Where are we going for Blackcoin development?
See my recent messages in this thread.
Quote
Finally, whats up with DrDolittle stuff?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOWpvdV1EDk