Search content
Sort by

Showing 13 of 13 results by DrFred
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: Expert Advice Needed, RE: Best Way to Integrate Bitcoin In Website?
by
DrFred
on 08/09/2012, 10:26:39 UTC
MtGox can do this too. They have been hacked before, but are supposedly a lot more secure now.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: I just made my first Bitcoin ATM withdrawal... 3BTC from my printer.
by
DrFred
on 07/08/2012, 18:18:24 UTC
1 and 3 can't work, as 1 would leave control of the private key with the vendor. 3 defeats the purpose of having a denomination on the note.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Statement about the suspect of recent Bitcoinica hack
by
DrFred
on 02/08/2012, 13:03:54 UTC
So imagine for 400k ?
Whoa, what? What 400k? Did anyone steal 400K? Is Zhou connected to someone stealing 400k? Where did you get that figure from?

The last time I checked this thread, Aurumxchange was holding $40k of Zhou's money or something to that nature, and Chen was caught stealing something as well, which Zhou is trying to get back from him. Refresh my memory.


The users funds they are still holding and haven't returned. Until that money is returned they have stolen over 400k USD.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: The UK Treasury probably isn't fond of Bitcoin
by
DrFred
on 25/07/2012, 10:18:59 UTC
There's no particular reason Bitcoin is incompatible with VAT-style tax systems. Think about inverting the situation.

Right now discounts for paying in cash is obviously a tempting deal for both parties because the buyer has no particular incentive to help the tax man.

The government could provide a rebate for reporting transactions to it. This is too much hassle for people to do today, so they rely on tapping the banking network to view transactions. But if you have open source clients and an automated, open payments system like Bitcoin nothing stops you having software that automatically reports things you purchased to the tax authorities who then effectively "cut you in" on the resultant tax take.

Alternatively, businesses are required to register the root public deterministic key, so the tax collectors can generate all the public keys that the business will be using. Random audits and/or micro-payments to consumers for reporting transactions mean the collectors can cross-check against the public addresses. If a business requests payment to an address that isn't derived from the right root key, it's obvious they are not reporting all their income.

It's not clear to me that our current tax system (in the UK) is the best way to do things, carousel fraud is a fairly obvious problem, but I feel that with further research a country could come up with a remarkably efficient and fair tax collection system that leverages Bitcoins strengths.

I was under the impression that you can't do the sort of check you are describing on a deterministic public key. The private one sure, but I don't think people would register those. Are you sure it's possible?
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: Armory - Discussion Thread
by
DrFred
on 18/07/2012, 10:49:39 UTC
Manually checking for a new version causes the issue too. Locks up for about 5 minutes until it shows error message "Latest Armory Version could not be retrieved, please check..." I can access versions.txt in my browser fine. Checked with wireshark and it doesn't seem to be attempting the connection (although I could be wrong, I don't use it that often). I don't have any firewall except windows which I tried turning off with no effect. I do have python installed separately as well, not sure if that could be causing any issues.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Class action Litigation vs. Bitcoinica Consultancy LTD & Intersango LTD
by
DrFred
on 16/07/2012, 12:15:53 UTC
My balance there was 98.19023272 BTC. No USD and no positions. Not really much money to contribute to this effort, but I'll help however I can.
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: Armory - Discussion Thread
by
DrFred
on 16/07/2012, 08:44:57 UTC
I reinstalled and python27.dll was installed fine as well, and armory now boots. But it is unresponsive once it loads up. After about 4 minutes it becomes responsive and appears to work fine.

This was the armory.exe.log


(WARNING) ArmoryQt.py:1273 - Memory pool file was corrupt.  Deleted. (no further action is needed)
(ERROR) ArmoryQt.py:782 - Could not access latest Armory version information
(ERROR) ArmoryQt.py:783 - Tried: https://raw.github.com/etotheipi/BitcoinArmory/logger/versions.txt


I then disabled the version check and restarted armory, this time it was immediately responsive.
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: Bringing Criminal Charges Against the Bitcoin consultancy
by
DrFred
on 15/07/2012, 16:49:29 UTC
Yeah, I agree. People automatically assume there's no way law enforcement would be able to do anything. I disagree, bitcoins in regard to bitcoinica could really just be a way of money transfer, as they were used interchangeably with USD on the site. You cannot argue that nothing was stolen as someone is richer and thousands are poorer, not only that, but digital property is still property. The supposed thefts are definitely a crime in the UK under our misuse of computer act, and the bitcoin consultancy should have used this very form to report them to the police. If this ends up in court I would like to see them come up with why they didn't report over £200 000 stolen to the authorities.
Post
Topic
Board Armory
Re: Armory - Discussion Thread
by
DrFred
on 15/07/2012, 15:33:05 UTC
Version 0.82.1

This version doesn't look a whole lot different, but it now creates an $(ARMORY_HOME_DIR)/armorylog.txt file which contains a ton of python logging information.  I couldn't redirect C++ output to file very easily, but most problems to date have been resolved through the python messages/errors.  I touched a ton of different pieces of code, and this needs some serious testing.  Help me out!   And if there's mysterious problems, use "File->Export Log File..." to create a copy of the log file to send me!  Feel free to check the log and tell me if what you think of the information it contains (and remove any info before sending).

Also added a version check.  There's a fake updated version so that you can see the pop-up it shows you and how it displays info.  I'll be removing the fake version before I actually release this version.  You can see a full changelog by going to "Help-->Armory Versions..."


Windows 64-bit installer
Windows 32-bit installer
Linux 64-bit Debian package
Linux 32-bit Debian package

For those of you compiling from source:  version 0.82.1 is the "logger" branch.

Wouldn't start on 64-bit windows. Throws 2 errors. "The specified module could not be found LoadLibrary(pythondll) failed" and missing PYTHON27.dll
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: Bringing Criminal Charges Against the Bitcoin consultancy
by
DrFred
on 14/07/2012, 17:26:23 UTC
This is not a lawsuit. This is reporting the facts to the police and they will decide whether there is a criminal case against Bitcoin Consultancy. Completely separate from any civil litigation. I'm not sure there necessarily is a criminal case here (not a lawyer), but there certainly could be (fraud, theft, criminal negligence)
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Topic OP
Bringing Criminal Charges Against the Bitcoin consultancy
by
DrFred
on 14/07/2012, 17:20:44 UTC
Hi, I'm one of bitcoinica's customers and haven't seen anyone else putting this suggestion forward yet. I feel like I have been the victim of a crime perpetrated by whoever was running bitcoinica at the time, as best as I can tell this is Bitcoin Consultancy (though they are deliberately evasive). As such I have filed a report with the UK police (I am also a UK citizen though you don't need to be). If you too feel you have been the victim of a crime then I encourage you to do the same here.

http://www.actionfraud.police.uk/ (This is the official way to do it, it is an offence to knowingly give false details and you will receive a crime number.)

If enough people report this the police will have no choice but to launch a full investigation, which I admit I am very interested in happening, as in my opinion a lot of the details around this case seem suspect.
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Whitelist Requests (Want out of here?)
by
DrFred
on 13/07/2012, 16:20:55 UTC
Whitelist please I need to post in the bitcoinica threads.
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Topic OP
Batch file help
by
DrFred
on 17/05/2012, 16:09:57 UTC
Hi, I've been using a few batch files to manage my mining and I decided to combine them all into one. I produced this

@echo off
title CGMiner
cd cgminer
CHOICE /M "Full power? y/n"
IF ERRORLEVEL 2 SET POWER=low
IF ERRORLEVER 1 SET POWER=high
:START
cd ../lite
CHOICE /M "Litecoin mining? y/n"
IF ERRORLEVEL 2 GOTO NEXT
IF ERRORLEVEL 1 start /AFFINITY 0x0E minerd -t 3 -O DrFred.1:x -o http://miningpool.com:9350
:NEXT
cd ../cgminer
start /AFFINITY 0x01 cgminer.exe -c %POWER%.conf
PAUSE
start /AFFINITY 0x01 cgminer.exe -c reset.conf

However, this doesn't work %POWER% is set to high regardless of what I press, I think it has something to do with the SET command returning it's own errorlevel. Could anyone point out what I'm doing wrong?


I managed to get it almost working how I wanted by changing the code to the following but now the "GOTO HIGH" bit doesn't work (returns 1 was unexpected). (Edit: fixed a typo, now working, but I'd still like it using the set command if possible)

@echo off
title CGMiner
cd cgminer
CHOICE /M "Full power? y/n"
IF ERRORLEVEL 2 GOTO LOW
IF ERRORLEVEL 1 GOTO HIGH
:START
cd ../lite
CHOICE /M "Litecoin mining? y/n"
IF ERRORLEVEL 2 GOTO NEXT
IF ERRORLEVEL 1 start /AFFINITY 0x0E minerd -t 3 -O DrFred.1:x -o http://miningpool.com:9350
:NEXT
cd ../cgminer
start /AFFINITY 0x01 cgminer.exe -c %POWER%.conf
PAUSE
start /AFFINITY 0x01 cgminer.exe -c reset.conf
GOTO END
:LOW
SET POWER=low
GOTO START
:HIGH
SET POWER=high
GOTO START
:END