LOL, its this guy again.

Bro, I already told you the first time. This is not how things work. You have to build the product first, have some kind of working prototype, and then announce it to the public. Once again, anyone can and does say anything on the internet, and without any kind of substance or proof behind it, it means nothing.


Since you can't spell your own name correctly, I don't think this even constitutes an impersonation attempt.

Oh, but you did in the thread title, so I guess it does.

---

edit: appending this here as the other thread is locked


The fact is in huntercoin no users attacked eachother at the start, they all just minted from nature aka like how bitcoin mining is done today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q41RW6bxpM4

Then as mining became harder, users opted to blow eachother up rather mine supply naturally
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYJVG1fKnRo

The point of the simulation prove that killing eachother in the future to make others users hashrate go down will be easier than mining supply from nature.

Also that 1 player wins in the end with bitcoin. Whoever is on the top will always be on the top. While the rest of the users will kill eachother, but like me I will kill the big boy and steal all his supply as I did it vs the AI in this simulation twice.

This is actually really cool. I had no idea HunterCoin was so popular at one point. The main flaw of the game was that the world resets periodically, emptying everyone's balance of game-earned credits and items and whatnot.


Doesn't actually have anything to do with Bitcoin whatsoever, but thanks for sharing nontheless.

LOL, its this guy again.

Bro, I already told you the first time. This is not how things work. You have to build the product first, have some kind of working prototype, and then announce it to the public. Once again, anyone can and does say anything on the internet, and without any kind of substance or proof behind it, it means nothing.


Since you can't spell your own name correctly, I don't think this even constitutes an impersonation attempt.

Oh, but you did in the thread title, so I guess it does.