You have such result, because you choose projects based on a high level of interest. There will be no other results. Pay attention to good projects with a lower level of interest, but with stable idea and working team. To focus on ICOBench, I do not advise you, as a result, you will get not very promising projects, together with a large number of people in campaign, and as a result, have as you said, $ 10 per week, which is not bad for a newbie, to be honest.

I believe Binance token BNB should be always first in the list. Next one KCS. Also you can pay your atention to tokens of fresh exchanges which only recently ended the ICO. For example Coinvest, LocalCoinSwap. Or Nauticus, registered with Australian Government regulator AUSTRAC.

Conduct daily monitoring of IcoDrops, and you will find a project with a good level of interest. Or personally conduct an analysis. I'm afraid that no one will be able to accurately answer Your question. You can pay attention to the project in my signature, it certainly is not Hype, but I believe that it will achieve success.

Of course not. Fiat money is supported by the state and production capacities, the cryptocurrencies, are mainly supported by interest from the community. It's too risky. I would still diversify my savings.

Thanks for the warning. It's unclear why they block for hashtags. And if it's not difficult, tell us how your friends managed to unlock, blocked forever accounts. I think many of us would be grateful for this information.

It is so safe, as any exchange can be. The risk of being hacked, is an issue to all exchangers in principle, so do not be afraid of them. Better not to keep a lot of money on the exchange wallets, leave funds only for current operations . For example, the project in my signature, promises to pay much attention to security, but will it manage? I think yes.
But hackers do not sleep, and create new ways to steal and fraud.

Yes, the team is good, but in their projects hunters often have problems that do not begin to be solved until the manager deigns to believe you, but it's too late to solve by standard methods. Even if the mistake was from their team.

Well said. I fully support. I will only add that the risk must always be justified and, if possible, well analyzed. You can take risks in different ways.

I think the main reason is not the dependence of Ethereum on Bitcoin, but the fears of investors and traders, with the redness of the market. And they run to withdraw funds to Fiat. In addition, the news that causes the fall affects not only Bitcoin.

I agree with your thoughts. This will scare off a large number of users. The most important thing is that this will kill multi-accounting. Not the smartest decision, but I think that this decision was dictated by security measures, it is still better to lose place in the top, than to lose the project at all, and go to jail. I think that in the future it is waiting for all centralized exchanges.

I do not think so. The price of ETH is affected by the price of Bitcoin and the number of successful ICOs. If the market loses its capitalization, it means that people change their crypto into fiat, the EOS is nothing to do with that.

First, You do not need to panic, never ever. The market does not like emotions. Secondly, after correction, growth will follow, this is obvious. I'm not sure about 1.000+, but it could be.

Only if you will invest in very promising coins and you will simply be lucky and they will give 5x's within 2-3 months. If you will use scalping, you can earn 5-10% of the deposit a day, calculate how much time you will take to increase your deposit 5 times. But you need to be able to do this, in the second, there is always the risk of losing your funds, or to go into long-term hold. Therefore, it is better to start participating in bounty campaigns and airdrops and for 2-3 months you will be able to collect $ 100, or use the advice of people in the posts above

Because very often the community is artificially formed due to the Airdrop. The quality of this community leaves much to be desired. A couple of days ago, one project canceled the ICO, because despite the fact of 30,000 people in the telegram group, after the launch of the ICO, only 0.8 ETH were invested in the project. If the idea of the ICO was very good, an Airdrop would help draw investors' attention to the project with a large community, but this was not happen.

The best way to store, it is a cold wallet. If there is no desire or\and opportunity to use it, yes, MEW is the best wallet for ERC-20 tokens. If possible, use it together with Trezor or Ledger.

Many, the so-called "new" members, are multi-accounts of already existing people. And the biggest problem, in my opinion, is when the project stretches the campaign for several months. During this time, the campaign fill with a huge number of bounty hunters and payments become simply ridiculous.

I think that the best advice will be an offer to learn how to understand the market. In addition, to control your emotions, to observe the more successful senior comrades and to delve into the topic of crypto currency.

Problem is, that a huge number of coins - 2.78 quadrillion, limits the growth potential of each IOTA coin. Obviously that, the more tokens we have, the less will be the value of each. One of the advantages of bitcoin is a limit the total number of coins to 21 million. IOTA tokens are approximately 132.4 million times larger than bitcoins.

But:
Since the start of the project in 2015, some major venture investors support IOTA project. Funds as "Outlier Ventures" and "Robert Bosch Venture Capital".
"Outlier Ventures" invested in IOTA an amount equal to 7 project cost estimates. Robert Bosch Venture Capital acquired a significant number of IOTA tokens in December 2017.
At the end of 2017, the partnership between IOTA and 20 large companies was agreed upon, including Deutsche Telecom and Fujitsu. And in February 2018, the German company Bosch announced that it will use IOTA technology to create an unmanned car.

Summarizing: The project has a large number of problems, but all of them could be solved. Interest from side of large players can give us suggestion that the coin has a good potential.

The founder of Cardano, is Charles Hoskinson - he was one of the founders of Ether. This means that behind this project are people who have an impeccable reputation, and have already managed to commit a blockchain revolution by creating the Ethereum platform. According to official sources, work on the development of the Cardano project began in far 2015, and by the end of 2019, all the ideas will be realized. The Cardano protocol provides an opportunity for compatibility and collaboration of such platforms as Ethereum, Bitcoin and even the Swift financial translation system. On this basis, answer yourself to the question whether it makes sense to keep it. 

Shitposting turned into shittopic creation, that's only result of merit system. Thought with merites is not bad, but very far from perfect. Not to mention the fact that the system has protected those multiacc users, because of whom it was created. Because they managed to pump their accounts. It was necessary to nullify the ranks, and then create merit system. Or make a KYC for oldschool guys, who want to keep the rank. I would suggest a downgrade of activiti ​​and, accordingly, the title, as a solution to the problem of spam. Or\and, if it is possible, that activity was counted not on the account, but on the ip, evenly distributed between the accounts which are enter from this ip. If someone comes through the proxy just do not count the activity. I do not know if this is possible.