#JOIN & #Proof of authentication
Bounty campaign: Media campaign
Bitcointalk username: Dumont31
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2542512
Telegram username: @Florin_r

also, let's not forget 50 Cent's story about Bitcoin. The rappers have a predisposition to this    talking seriously now, it's about the people that you can influence through your name

Also, you should take a look here, I like their approach and it's called Daicore. They say investor can withdraw from underperforming projects or scams and apparently they should go live soon as I see some ICOs listed on their website.

1.Have you invested or are you thinking of investing in an ICO?
    Yes

2. By what means of communication did you hear about the last ICOs you remember?
    d) Technology Sites

What do you think is the time to invest in an ICO?
    a) The ideea
    b) Team
    c) Market that an ICO will act

3. What do you evaluate when investing in an ICO? Priority order.
    d) How much has already been invested
    b) Team

4. When you invest in an ICO you look.
    d) History of the team and investors

As a long-term goal we should overcome this paradigm. If you find a way to ban crypto, be sure that we'll find a solution - but it shouldn't work like this. By banning, I believe states want to hide internal problems. When your hear banning, it sounds like something bad; illegal - but it's a huge differencee between illegal and bad.

Statistics show that the number of Bitcoin ATMs is raising. I hope that the utility will be increased. In this way the curiosity of new users will be increased and new users who want to be integrated will appear. I hope that the amounts of transactions will also increased, because new merchants are starting to accept this way of payment. The good news is that we have a lot of enthusiasts and this works like a trend which maintains the notoriety.

Yes, I have the same point here. It's safe to hold BTC and ETH for long-term like a safety belt, but when we're talking about now the situation gets complicated. However, for new coins, we should not be distracted by hype - but at the same time take advantage of it

While reading this topic, I find that it's better to invest in first 25 coins because they have big chances to develop opportunities.

Even though Bitcoin is not an usual currency, it occupies a special place in people's mentality. This currency has the capacity to bring value to us trough its own existence. Thus, it creates a viable alternative to increase the standards.

This is very useful, I used to have this problem.

I advise you to keep large amounts of money in your wallet, not on the platform, even if you are a daily trader.

Also, if you are trading a rare currency, think twice if the platform you find is trustworthy. Exclusivity for a coin is hard to pay. There were cases when the platforms were closed.

Theoretical strategies have little chance of getting real. I say this because the market is very fluid. The advice I offer is to clearly specify  estimated trading period you want.

As I heard in the past, the democracy is an cantitative regime, instead of an qualitative one.

I didn't think in this specific way. The concept is interesting. On a wider scale, the essence of our currency is lost, but local it wins. At the local level the trust is gained, because it respect the custom of the region that adopted it. Running the same conceptual idea of glocalization, I think that the key of adoption at a larger scale it's by uniting more people in one entity directed by the same concept.


It is true, the level of confidence and specificity decreases.

Weapons have a multifaceted character. Weapons can, for example, be considered as a method or as an objective itself. It could be cool to hold a weapon, this is as an objective, because it is a passion. As a mean, you can hold a weapon for killing or to defend yourself against others.

As statistics we can see

• 1984 to 1994: 19 incidents

• 1994 to 2004 (ban is in effect): 12 incidents

• 2004 to 2014: 34 incidents

These statistics show the following idea that as an pragmatic effect, indeed, mass shooting has been reduced. I consider the law of arms to be influenced by the tradition of the place where the law is implemented. The number of weapons-related crimes is 25 times higher in the US than in any other developed country.

I watch everyday my portfolio and nothing changes. I hope that is just a matter of time. I am optimist because the only way things are going is forward. I encourage you not to stop because the environment is versatile but the core is the same.

Yes, they have a new leader. It is an economic rule that tells us that as long as there is demand there will be an offer. It is very possible not to recover the fortune. Anyway, it is funny the hypothesis by which El Chapo's money would pay the wall. I do not think his money will be recovered, especially as we are talking about net worth. Most likely they will remain in goods that will be difficult to trace.

     You cannot stop propagating information, even if you ban its main channels of distribution. Social Media has played a decisive role in this movement. In most of the countries that have had riots, rebalancing has been achieved somehow. We must not forget that Syria is still in a tragic situation. The Arab Spring has taught us that dictators have limited days and  they cannot oppose to the masses that are fighting for a cause. Mohamed Bouazizi was a visionary for his business, but because of coruption he could not potentiate it. When you try to stop the free markets as state, surely the result will not be a good one.

     This is a nice point of view  I missed this detail. In other ways, however, it was not a crime committed through violence. I read that is a whole campaign pro Ross Ulbricht with a lot organizations.

     Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht is serving a double life sentence + 40 years without parole for all non-violent charges associated with creating the Silk Road website.
     El Chapo has an impressive record, has escaped twice from prison and he risks being locked up for life.
          What do you think?

     As you can see the changes that we live in are profound, especially in this dynamic era. The technology plays an essential role not only from the perspective of creating new infrastructures, but also from the perspective of its conceptualization. I strongly believe that in the coming years, a large amount of the non-integrated population in the financial system will gain a particular desire to be part of the new system  - without linking to central authorities. Economies are becoming increasingly interlinked. At the moment, our money in the wallet is worthwhile because there is someone who guarantees for it. What if we still have money that are still recognized without the need for someone as central power to authenticate and supervise them? This is my way of conceptualisation these changes.
     What role do you think Bitcoin plays in the context of globalization? Bitcoin conceptualization in the context of globalization