You guys are missing the incredibly obvious.

At the time of the ICO, the amount of crypto raised is priced in USD and the token is valued in USD. However by Dean's own admission he holds the crypto and never sold for USD. This means if the value of the crypto goes up (like it has) Dean personally gets free money. But if the value of the crypto went down, Dean can just fold betking up or even just say it can't afford to do buy backs. Which is true.


So the whole betking ICO was just a way for Dean to expose himself to profit if crypto went up, and expose himself to nothing if it went down. This is why he has no real reason to work on the site, it was never about it.

But being blunt, it's completely investors fault for buying into it. The terms were straight forward and obvious. They bought into the ICO mania, and will need to pay for it.

If you wish to attack people over the indirect effects from their actions, you may wish to start by addressing the thousands of young girls who were raped and murdered indirectly due to your actions over the last 16 years on this planet.

I'm not sure how you could have read the thread and come to that conclusion. They were shown clearly the exploit, multiple third parties reproduced and started exploited it. And their reaction was to mock the idea of their code having an exploit. They then put a fix in place which didn't fix the issue, but only the UI and then continued to trash talk and brag about how the controversy will help their site.

I disagree, he's corrosive and full of shit as ever

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=774929.msg12510016#msg12510016

As someone who's played on all of these sites and more, my meta review

PrimeDice = Fair Review
777Coin = Fair Review
BitcoinRush = Trust should be dropped even further. See bitcoinrush.com for example
LuckyBit = Underrated, they should be increased in trust
Crypto-Games = wtf? Did you see how they handled the +EV betting? They should be D- at best
DirectBet = The site sucks, I would lower their site rating considerably. But seems like a fair review
PocketRocketsCasino = Trust should be dropped much more, can't think of a bigger liar
NitrogenSports = Fair Review
AnoniBet = Fair Review
bustabit = Fair Review
FortuneJack = Trust should be dropped further, after their stats faking
SatoshiDice = Fair Review, although they should just get a F for all fields.

It is not a flat fee, it seems to be 2% of your bet. I can't find where they say this though

agree


I would be willing to accept they are ignorant but if you look at the language they use "a zero-house edge, peer to peer game"   and  "head-to-head match of winner takes all". Even reading the small print I can't find where they say they will take 2%. They are intentionally hiding it, while promoting it as "zero-house edge" while playing normal bitcoin dice would be better.  There is no where on the site that will tell you this, and no history to show you this. It's up to you to catch them in the act. Combined with this casinos past actions if they are not scammers they are extremely dishonest

THIS SITE IS A SCAM

Was playing their "zero edge" game, and found out the whole site a scam. Even the title of the thread is a blatant lie. They say it's zero-edge, but they're actually applying 2% house edge. I was playing against a friend and we noticed something was wrong. So we compared the sum of our balances before and after playing, and found out they are skimming 2% on each game

I don't take make scam accusations lightly, so we carefully verified this 3 times. I would like to show a screenshot of our history, but they seem to try cover their tracks by making that unavailable.  I challenge anyone else to try this, and tell me the site isn't a total scam.

For an extra level of irony I mistaken typed in bitcoinrush.com (instead of .io) and it seems like they also have made some enemies scamming affiliates.

DO NOT PLAY HERE OR BE AN AFFILIATE TO THEIR SCAM