Hello,

My post count is 1094. I just changed the signature. Thank you!

Let's face it, all sorts of "insider" tips and "sure-fire" strategies are mere baits. The people offering them know exactly who they're targeting-newcomers, who have a high aim to win easy money easily and just don't have a correct concept of how the things go about. Scammers love ignorance and impatience, building story after story to finally hit at somebody and relieve them of money.

If someone claims they have fixed matches or flawless predictions, that's already a huge red flag. Think about it: if they really had a magic formula for winning bets, why would they share it with strangers for free—or even for a cut of the winnings? They'd be quietly making a fortune on their own. Instead, what they do is prey on greed and desperation. They spin a tale, demand a minimum bet, and set conditions that make no sense unless you’re not thinking clearly.

The best defense is to slow down, read carefully, and use common sense. If something feels too good to be true, it usually is. It's really unfortunate that so many of these schemes exist, but it just takes a little bit of caution and a willingness to do some research on your own.

It is a bit off-putting that the deposit and withdrawal requirements are not clearly explained. Usually, a simple "1x wager" rule would suffice to comply with AML standards, but here it feels overcomplicated. Moreover, the lack of recent responses from the team isn't too inspiring. A new platform should be eager to engage, clarify policies, and reassure players about any concerns, especially around things like native tokens or confusing rules. A simple, open dialogue would go a long way toward building trust and keeping players interested.

Honestly, the current user experience on Whale.io feels quite rough around the edges. There's too many issues in the game: long loading times, blank screens after logging in with Telegram, difficulties logging in with email, and a frustrating inability to change your username from "no name." These problems make the site feel incomplete and may push players away.

Some users also report delayed crediting of winnings and the lack of proper live chat, with support given only through a Telegram bot. For a platform trying to gain traction, all these glitches and uncertainties don't inspire confidence.

The Whale.io team really needs to iron out these bugs before asking players to deposit or invest time. Smoothing out the login procedures, fixing those display issues, streamlining the registrations, and offering reliable on-site support would go a long way toward earning trust. As it is, it just doesn't feel ready for prime time.

It's nice to see that Ark is getting more concrete, especially now when there is a roadmap and a team working on it. While it's still very early and many things are not clear—like which of the covenant proposals will be used and how the Ark will fit alongside Lightning—it feels like there's genuine effort to solve current pain points. If the team can continue to communicate transparently, present actual demos, and find a smooth way to integrate it with existing infrastructure, then Ark could prove to be a valuable tool in an effort to make off-chain Bitcoin transactions more private, efficient, and user-friendly.

It's understandable to worry about Bitcoin's future with President Trump becoming president. However, Bitcoin is decentralized and has proven resilient against regulatory changes. While there are rumors about Trump and Elon Musk promoting a new cryptocurrency, be cautious—these could be misinformation or scams. Bitcoin's recent price increase is due to various factors, not just the election outcome. Overall, Bitcoin doesn't appear to be in trouble, but it's important to stay informed and be wary of unverified claims.

Hey,

You're right that CAmount is a signed 64-bit integer, which technically allows for negative values. However, in practice, Bitcoin transactions won't have negative amounts—those would just get rejected by the MoneyRange function.

The reason they use a signed integer is mostly for flexibility, especially when handling wallet balances. For example, if you’re tracking the net effect of transactions on your wallet, it could temporarily show a negative value (like fees deducted before funds are added). But on-chain amounts themselves always need to be non-negative.

So, the code allows for negative numbers internally, but anything that's actually a transaction amount will always be checked to make sure it’s non-negative.

Hope this clears it up!

Great initiative, It’s always a plus to have a UK-based pool option, especially with reduced latency for miners nearby. Of course, it’s a challenge to get started against the established big players, but every pool had to prove itself at the beginning. Personally, I think if you manage to hit a few blocks early on, it could bring in more people. Wishing you the best of luck in landing those first few blocks!

Up, we are back and ready to work on your projects !

Up ! we are back for new interessant projects !

Service available !

Service OPEN Contact me now to have the pricing

I am Back for interested projects !

I am Back for interested projects !

I am Back for interested projects !

I am Back for interested projects !

I am Back for interested projects !

I am Back for interested projects !

Up

Up