Your message is a good one which i see you trying to encourage those who many have missed out on bitcoin's investment early days to take action now, but do don't get me wrong most people mean some newbies don't like the part of been giving an adivise for potential of the future growths and reward.

That is why it's always adiviseable that it never to late to jump into the bitcoin trend because most newbies are having this worng mindset that stated does opportunity still exists or sand if am interested in bitcoin investmen? But to me i think little they know that many opportunities still exists for those just starting with Bitcoin accumulation regardless of when you begin, pulse as a newbie instead of dwelling on past decisions begin many some years ago, it really better to focus on starting now, having this at the back of your mind as a newbie starting consistency pulse patience are the majority key here in the bitcoin accumulation world and aslo the part were you did made mention of accumulation bitcoin for over 4-10 year or more with discretionary funds can lead to a big time significant potential profits if the cards are been played well.

A good day for bitcoin today, since it almost caught up to my total pushups, so perhaps in the coming days it will pass me up..

100k,JayJuanGee,522,117640,2025-07-10

That is one of the ongoing faults in thinking.  Even though earlier is better, opportunities are not lost for those who are just starting out.

In other words, it is best to get started as soon as possible because there is no way to turn back the clock to go back and buy bitcoin that you had previously neglected to buy.


Newbies are in the wrong mindset if they consider buying the dip as their only or their main strategy.  Sure, it is possible and maybe even reasonable to supplement with some dip buying preparations, but it is likely better as a side strategy rather than a primary strategy.

Of course, each person is responsible for choosing and following his own strategies, even though frequently, there has been a tendency for folks to be too timid in their DCA, and they would have had been better off to be a bit more aggressive.


A typo.  BTC.


People have to figure out for themselves what they consider to be basic expenses that are required for living or basic expenses to keep at a certain social status or basic expenses in order to avoid penalities.

They have to be able to distinguish basic expenses from discretionary expenses, and sure sometimes the line is not clear.

Maybe there are ways to save $200 per month on rent, but a person specifically chooses to have a higher lifestyle and to pay $200 per month more, and that lifestyle may well become part of the person's perceptions of what are basic expenses.

People who have various luxuries have more places that they could potentially cut down what they perceive to be their "basic" expenses, but there also may well be some costs to cut down on some of the expenses... maybe twice a month you take you spouse (or partner) to a restaurant that costs around $80 for each of the trips. You get pleasure from those tips and both of you get various benefits, yet these costs could be cut in part or in total, yet some of the pleasure might get cut too... So the choices are not always easy to figure out which costs might be cuttable within reason.


For sure, not everyone is starting from the same place, and there are some people who are quite poor, live in an area where it is difficult to improve their income and they may even have various family obligations (or health problems) that keep them from being able to increase their discretionary income.. .... so if a person is more challenged in his situation, he has to attempt to be more organized in order to potentially attempt to make up for some of his disadvantages.  Surely a guy in his early 20s would likely be in a better place to potentially improve his employment opportunities  as compared with a guy in his 40s, 50s or 60s and sometimes if a guy has lived a considerable amount of his life within certain kinds of employment and practices, it might become even more difficult for him to both identify a way out and to be able to pursue that way out.

Sometimes health conditions start to kick in, and some folks have the misfortune for their health to start to deteriorate earlier rather than later, and some of that might be due to their life style choices and other parts of that might either be coincidence (luck) or genetics.

I agree that sometimes there are needs to cut out some of the "having fun," and to either defer some of the gratification or maybe to spend a bit less time having fun, and structuring less "fun time," and surely none of us can tell any other person how much fun they should have or not have, and they are in the better position to judge their balance of fun, even though sometimes objectively someone might look from the outside and consider that there are some folks who might have their priorities mixed up and they are coming to poor lifestyle choices that likely will end up negatively affecting their future wealth.


Hopefully guys are not expecting to need to know about shitcoins in order to understand bitcoin first.

And even with bitcoin, there is no need to attempt to have extensive knowledge prior to getting started investing in bitcoin.  Many folks should get started with bitcoin and focus on bitcoin first and learn about bitcoin while they are learning about their cashflow management.  They do not need to learn about shitcoins and crypto and blockchain technology and mumbo jumbo.. They may well need to learn to figure out if they have a discretionary income or not so that they can get started buying bitcoin, and sure maybe they do not know very much about bitcoin when they first start except looking at a price chart and seeing that the price has tended to go up and down and maybe realizing that it is not guaranteed to continue to go up, and maybe they start out in bitcoin and they are pretty sure that they have $100 per week that they could invest in bitcoin if they were to have confidence in bitcoin, yet they might be nervous about bitcoin, so they might purposefully start investing $30 per week until they get more comfortable to hopefully be able to increase their investment amount to $100 per week and perhaps greater and greater amounts.. and it can surely take some time for any newbie to become comfortable with bitcoin, even though surely some guys learn faster than others, and some folks have more experience in their investing and/or cashflow management practices than others, too..


You are talking about traders and not investors, but you are referring to them as if they were investors.

What point are you wanting to make about the people that you are supposedly seeing to be a lot of people in bitcoin who claim to be DCAing?  

There are a lot of people who mix up trading and investing, and hopefully you are not going to get lured into such a trap.

You sound like you are interested in what the traders are doing, when you likely need to be focused on yourself, and surely if you have been in bitcoin for 3.5 years, like your forum registration date suggests could be the case, then surely you might be starting to get into a good position in regards to your having had been able to build your bitcoin position and to be soon able to get through a whole four years.. but yeah, maybe you are thinking about playing this here particular bitcoin price wave rather than continuing to accumulate bitcoin.  

Surely it is possible that a person in with your bitcoin timeline might have had been able to get into a position of overaccumulation, and so that would give you more options if you have gotten to overaccumulation status, but even if you have gotten to overacccumulation status, you still likely have to be careful in regards to how much bitcoin you might choose to sell and if you are planning to buy back cheaper or if you might be merely selling within a price-based sustainable withdrawal or time-based sustainable withdrawal approach.  From my experience, usually price-based sustainable withdrawal would be easier to start to employ, but still I would not anticipate that guys sell bitcoin with expectations of buying back cheaper..  even though sure, you are free to do whatever you like in regards to your bitcoin management practices... if you think that you might have had gotten to an overaccumulation status.

I recall seeing other posts from you in the past that causes me to believe that you likely have been employing trading strategies, which it becomes way the fuck more difficult to ever reach overaccumulation status if you are fucking around trading and believing that you might be able to sell and buy back cheaper.

Think about the last 2.5 years. The BTC price has been mostly going up from its $15,479 bottom in November 2022 until now, and yeah there have been some price dips during the past 2.5 years, but guys who have been focused on BTC accumulation (especially aggressively and persistently) have probably done way better than guys who had been trying to fuck around trading during that timeline.


Of course, you have to figure out what works for you, and surely any brand new person to bitcoin woudl likely be way better off to figure out ways to stay focused on persistent, ongoing, regular, consistent and perhaps even aggressive bitcoin buying, which likely would not be productive to be trying to figure out how dips might fit into such plan.

Surely, the longer that any of us are in bitcoin, then the growth of our already existing bitcoin stack might help to justify to tweak the strategy and perhaps even to moderate towards buying on dips and even further down the road, the DCA portion might get completely removed and such person with a larger BTC stack might start to decide to ONLY accumulate during dips.

Beginner bitcoin investors are not in such a place, so they likely are better off to mostly focus on DCA, yet whatever they decide is within their choice, and surely if they are able to lump sum then they are also in a different position if they have those kinds of lump sum opportunities that might not be available to some folks who are merely relying on their regular income and even determining that they don't have a lot of discretionary money, so they are doing their best to figure out how to balance out their cashflow so that they can invest every week and DCA seems to be the best option available for them... and commonly, guys might not feel a lot of conviction for bitcoin, and they may well be learning about bitcoin, and yeah the longer they are in bitcoin and the longer that they are able to both invest in bitcoin on a regular basis and learn about it, then they may also start to feel justified to tweak their BTC accumulating approach, and even after a year or two investing in bitcoin, they may well might have had gotten their cashflow position into a stronger place and even put together their back up funds and gotten used to how to manage such back up funds, so surely the more their cashflow management systems are strong and their bitcoin investment is taking root, then the more they might be able to incorporate buying on dip systems into what they are doing.


Of course if a person has a lump sum amount that comes available to him such as $2,500, and he had been buying $100 worth of bitcoin every week for the past year, then he may well realize that the $2,500 is the equivalent of the past 6 months that he had been buying bitcoin, and surely it would not necessarily be best for the guy to DCA with the additional $2,500, but instead it might be prudent for him to also consider 1) buying right away and/or 2) buying on the dip as two other possible ways to invest the $2,500 into bitcoin.. there is no one exact correct answer, yet I doubt that DCAing that money is necessarily the correct answer.

Another thing is that DCA may well be employed as a way to buy as much bitcoin as a guy can buy as soon as he gets the money, so he is not using DCA to defer his BTC buys or in order to buy bitcoin at various prices, since he does not necessarily want to buy bitcoin at various prices, he prefers to buy bitcoin at the lowest price that he is able to buy it, yet since he has no clue if the BTC price is going to go up or go down, when ever he gets money that he can authorize to buy BTC, he buys right away with that money.. which is also known as DCA... So DCA can be aggressive or whimpy or somewhere in between, it is completely within the realm of each of our choices to figure out how aggressive or whimpy we would like to be in our DCA approach... We can also end up being overly aggressive, so we have to figure out a balance that does not cause us to get recked..


You can choose at whatever point you believe diversification to be appropriate for you, and surely if you have a small budget, such as $100 per week and you have been  investing a couple of years into bitcoin, you may well not even be near a point in which diversification would be justified, yet of course, it is up to the person if he wants to put money in other places and then potentially end up having to reduce their bitcoin investment to a lower weekly amount... because whenever you divesify, you are taking money that could have had been put into bitcoin.... so even if you keep investing in bitcoin, it is surely not obvious that your bitcoin investment had not been affected.

You can plot it out on a chart.  Go back 1 or 2 cycles, and then have a guy start out investing $100 per week into bitcoin for 1-2 years, and then after the first 1-2 years, he invests $50 into bitcoin and $50 in some other asset.. choose whichever one you like.  The guy who stayed focused on bitcoin is likely going to have had done way better than the person who chose to invest into inferior assets... and yeah we see those examples frequently, and guys can do what they like and suffer the consequences of their decisions, either way.

By the way, even a guy who invests 25% of his income into bitcoin, it is going to take him 4 years to get to a point that he had invested a whole year's income into bitcoin.. and maybe by then  there might be some justification to diversify, but I have a hard time considering scenarios of a guy investing smaller amounts and/or even shorter periods of time starting to conclude that there might be some value in diversifying into other investments, even though surely there are a lot of folks who consider diversification as if it were a good thing, even for relatively newbies.


I continue to wonder why members keep repeating the wrong statement, which is that you cannot diversify until you have reached overaccumulation status.

That clearly is not correct.

It is possible for someone who is new to push-ups to achieve 1300 push-ups within 11 days, but for someone who's not a fitness type, it will be difficult for the person to achieve 1300 push-ups within 11 days because he lacks the stamina that will allow him to push above his limit to do plenty of push-ups, so there's a high possibility that Emylion fudged the numbers, but since we can't prove it, he will get away with it.

I disagree with you with that word that you just used by an investor being busy forcing a newbie into Bitcoin investments without telling or teaching a newbie all about Bitcoin first, i want you to take back such words because no investors that will very busy forcing anyone or any newbies to embark into investments without teaching the newbie the basic knowledge that is associated when it comes to Bitcoin, and every investors knows that newbie is just like a laying a foundation of building and the process in the foundation is lay well at very start it end collapsing, which means that for every newbies that is been introduced into Bitcoin should be preparely guide and need to know how Bitcoin works even if it took such weeks in just learning all about Bitcoin, that should  be a very good start for every newbies that is up coming.

Let it be known that this morning when shaving I decided to leave the beard. No coincidence that within a couple of hours we hit new highs. Don’t worry folks, I’m not shaving it again until September. The time is now and I’m ready to rock with some new all time highs and will have the beard ready to call the top. 

There is likely a pretty big difference between the level of abilities of a guy who can do non-stop push-ups as compared with what I did by breaking them into chunks. For that longest day of 1,330 pushups, I had 18 split sets that took place over a little less than 16 hours, so there tended to be right around 50 minutes between my sets and perhaps 1-2 minutes between the two subsets of the split sets, so there were 36 subsets that averaged about 36 pushups for each subset.  It also took me quite a bit of time to work up to that level, including my trying to make sure that I did not get injured and I was allowing a sufficient amount of time to recover between sets, even while practicing to work up to be able to push for the record day.  None of my prep days were more than 800 pushups, so many of the prep days were between 400 and 785 pushups.

I don't know how 10,507 non-stop pushups can happen so there may be some acceptable ways to rest while continuing to do pushups and still labelling the whole thing as non-stop...and acceptable ways to keep the pushup form, but even 1 pushups a second, that would be close to 3 hours of non-stop pushups..and many of us likely experienced breaking points where our muscles seem to fail at a certain point...

 The most pushups that I did was nearly 80.. maybe it was 78 or something like that.  Many times I would be getting to muscle failure in my 60s, but surely my abilities to do more pushups in a stretch did get better.. At the same time, I am no young pup, so I have quite a few ailments and pains in my body, including difficulties with my recovery time.  Younger guys can likely work out some kind of a system to beat what I did, and if I were younger, I might try to beat what I did, but it does not seem to be good use of my time or even maybe counter-productive for me to be shooting for those kinds of quantities of pushups.

By the way, your picture is of Charles Linster (who did 6,006 pushups in a row) and not Minoru Yoshida who did 10,507 pushups in a row.  From this video, right?

100k,JayJuanGee,519,117180,2025-07-07

Well it is possible that there would be no remedy to make up for the regrets, mistakes are normal in life, but what would be more important is trying to move on from that mistakes and make up for the opportunity missed by investing in Bitcoin and accumulating aggressively when the opportunity presents itself to do it more aggressively and also trying to be careful so we don't over do it that it will affect our Bitcoin portfolio, definitely there will be limit to a level we can get to be making our investment aggressive, but we should also understand that we've to know our limit depending our our level of discretionary income, and sometimes we might also think of increasing our discretionary income to be more aggressive in accumulation, like we can decide to cut off some expenses that might not be that necessary, like for example we can decide to reduce some expenses that goes to alcohol and cigarettes and instead of buying some expensive clothe, and clubbing we can actually decide to cut off some of that expenses and generate more discretionary income from there. Which is very important in this stage of accumulation.

I want to say that Juventus has a pretty strong defense, but in fact when they played in the group stage against Man City, Juventus' defense was destroyed by Pep Guardiola's team with a final score of 5-2.

From what I see right now about Real Madrid, it seems like they are currently having a little problem with their attack line, where even though Real Madrid is filled with the best attackers and midfielders, in several matches they have had difficulty scoring a goal. But fortunately Real Madrid has a striker who can solve this need, Gonzalo Garcia really became a savior for the Los Blancos squad. I think he should have been in the main squad since last season, he performed better than Endrick.

978509 looks good.

I did 120 steps ip and down the stairs and 20 minutes on the bike.


tomorrow I will do pushups.

The mighty PSG tamed by Botafogo !!!

Wait a minute why are South American teams doing so well in this competition, if am not mistaken non of them has lost a game this far... should we be considering this Cup could be going this direction and not Europe where we have the so called big teams

Is this some kind of football script written to give exposure to this league or something  

Still can't believe PSG was contained to zero goals for them.

It is really sad that a strong team like Real Madrid drew the match against Al Hilal, even though they are the strongest team in La Liga, they did not win. If I were less, maybe Real Madrid could easily beat Al Hilal in this match but it was very difficult and the whole match was very interesting. I am watching this match and in the first half both teams scored one goal each and there was a draw. Although many imagined that Real Madrid would come back in the second half of this match but they failed to come back instead Al Hilal team attacked and defended strongly. Anyway these two teams played well from start to finish and both teams had almost equal ball possession, moreover the Group H point table is equal in points for both teams.

Rico Lewis could not even wait till advancement of the league before conceiving a red card, I no that there are some situations you cannot avoid such resulting situations but since wydad is a small team it should have just been played with red card free from Manchester City because wydad is not a contender on there group, although if not for the small clubs Manchester City has there I would have said Rico Lewis absent will be negative for them but without him they are still bound to win all. Inter Milan did not do as Manchester City because they rather prefer 1:1.

I don't like having children. It's easy and doesn't require much philosophizing and interpretation. For this reason, most of my relationships with women have failed to develop into a formal relationship. For me, marriage is all about finding a true life partner to share our ups and downs, and that's enough. Just as I don't like to be tied down to someone who is too attached to her family, I also don't like having children who might one day tire me out or whose rights I might have neglected. Don't call me a "pessimist," because I know circumstances change, and what's best for me today isn't guaranteed tomorrow, no matter how many guarantees there are. These are personal beliefs and preferences, and unfortunately, it doesn't seem like there are women who share my perspective, and most, if not all, consider marriage as a means of procreation.

Are there women who share this perspective? Where or how can I find one? (I know this is bitcointalk not tinder hhh). Why should the concept of commitment extend to procreation as if it were a natural outcome when we are the ones who decide that?

Btw, i live in arabic country with conservative culture. Marriage and having children is a must for everybody and people don't even dare to discuss such topics. What do you think guys?

Niger delta as the history have it that Niger delta is the first country that first fight to be on their own

What happened alongside is what will don't know

How come about this Biafra...
And why Niger delta don't support Biafra

By my assumptions, there are strong indications already that we are moving past an era where employers put educational qualifications at the fore front of their requirement for employment into certain positions, some employers now hold personal qualities such as skills possessed by the individual ahead of the school they went to and the degree they graduated with. First, I would like to ask, could this be a reflection of a failing educational system? My second question is that if you happen to be the employer here, which will you consider more, school or skills?