I've been folding for Curecoin for almost a month now, and I can tell you that that calculator isn't too accurate. It shoots a little on the lower end of the average Curecoin payout you'll get. It does give you a good ballpark estimate, however.

It seems like the difficulty threshold on suprnova being as low as it is is tripping their share spoofing detector or something... I only get about a minute and a half where the miner shares are accepted (both with djm's miner and nvMiner-D7), and then every share is rejected.

Edit: Seems the suprnova guys are onto the issue! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=713003.msg8089093#msg8089093

Edit2: Seems they overshot on the difficulty... A bit too high for my rig at least.

I get about ~90 Mh/s on my 780 Ti with nvMiner D7 when mining Doomcoin on suprnova, but ~114 Mh/s when solo-mining. It looks like the drop in hashrate is because suprnova has tweaked the difficulty level for shares accepted to a relatively low number, which causes a bit of instability.

I know this really doesn't have to do with ccminer discussions as much as nVidia mining/hashing in general, but I figured a good deal of people come to this thread to discuss the most profitable way to use nVidia power, so here goes: I've done a little trial run over the past day and a half of using Folding@Home to "mine" Curecoins, and I'm getting a pretty good payout (payout should be at about 30-35 or so Curecoins/day for my card's PPD; roughly 0.0035-0.0042 BTC/day at the current rate).
It certainly doesn't hurt that my GPU is folding proteins and helping researchers while using all that power, instead of doing random hashing, but even without those considerations, the profit margin speaks for itself (for reference, Bombadil's profit calculator shows my 3 most profitable mining options at: {TAG: VEIL | Name:Veilcoin | Algo: X13 | BTC/day: .00316889, TAG: PP9X11 | Name:Multipool X11 (PP) | Algo: X11 | BTC/day: .00302276, TAG: XMR | Name:Monero | Algo: CryptoNight | BTC/day: .00215359}).

I get about 250k PPD with my 780 Ti and i5-4670k, so folding might be more relevant to single-card/gaming rigs moreso than pure mining rigs, but looking into F@H couldn't hurt for other kinds of rigs (I'd be interested to see what a full 750 Ti rig with a mid-range processor could put out in terms of PPD)!

I'm getting 505-525 h/s (short run just for benchmark) with my 780 Ti Classified with 6x120 (up from ~475 h/s on the 6/30 release of tsiv's cryptonight ccminer).

Getting about 14 Mh/s with the whirlcoin miner with my 780 Ti Classified.
Great work!

Ah, I see. I think the pre-Killer-Groestl-update submissions for relevant algos are probably not accurate anymore; maybe some culling of old submissions is all that's needed.

bigjme, while cudamining.cc is getting updated, could you take a look at the configurations page? In the short form, a few of the stats (hashrate, voltage/OC) get messed up and don't display the correct numbers (the long form works fine).

We're past block 1440 and still at 1k block reward... dev?

Freshcoin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=670939.0

Try using -f 256 on suprnova. -f 32 on hashharder seems to also smooth out the shares a bit.

Edit: Seems that hashharder might be having issues, even if shares show as accepted in ccminer. I would stick to suprnova for the time being, as the expected payouts with -f 256 are much higher, and the pool-reported hashrate is much more accurate (reflecting a more accurate sharerate).

Tried -f 256 for mining on suprnova; seemed to help, as I'm getting accepted shares there now.

Finally getting accepted shares on hashharder after they adjusted their difficulty expectations.

http://i.imgur.com/ObOzsxd.jpg

Solo-mining seems to be working fine in terms of the rate of shares being submitted, unlike with the pools.
The problem I'm having is that the fresh-ccminer only submits what seems to be one share a minute, or a share as soon as a new block is detected, and most of those shares (if not all) aren't accepted.

Whoops!  475 h/s was actually at -l 6x120.

Did some short-run testing (FWIW, my rig is running on 8 GB of RAM and on an i5-4670k @ 4.5 GHz.):
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6x128 : 450 h/s
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 4x128 : 430 h/s
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 4x120 : 440 h/s

I might do some more testing at a later date for higher thread numbers, but, from what it looks like so far, other choices are still more profitable for higher-end cards (like the 780 Ti) to mine.

Thanks for putting this all together in one package!

For CryptoNight without the launch config, nvminer gave me 64 blocks of 8 thread (8x64), and gave me about 385 h/s on my 780 Ti Classified. -l 4x120 gives me 475 h/s, for reference.

Quick solution so that you don't get mad at these "scam coins" and "lying devs" - don't mine coins that you don't like, and keep track of devs. If there really is a "lying dev", don't mine the coins he releases. Investigate the premine blocks and verify for yourself they are the correct amount.

There's really no reason to be upset if you don't mine what you consider to be "scam coins".
There's a certain amount of risk that lots of miners toe the line on these days, with tons of new coins and new algos flooding the space, that the next coin they mine will leave them holding the bag instead of making a profit, and if you don't want to toe that line, stick to the established, "safe" coins.

Thanks for the suggestion - up to 450-475 h/s range!

-l 4x120 gives me 420-450 h/s on my 780 Ti on today's release from tsiv. Lots of posters from the earlier release found good results with -l 8x60 on 750 Tis, but my GPU lost performance or crashed for the same threads x blocks with any number of threads that isn't 4 (i.e. my GPU didn't like -l 8x60 or -l 6x80, and got worse results, or crashed, on these launch configs).

Getting about 3100-3150 kh/s on the x15 miner on my 780 Ti Classified from the binary linked earlier ( https://mega.co.nz/#!8AMnjSiL!ksUru2G5fOYTeDPvL-hwStr_utlUnC-ST0hvUFHensE ). Pretty solid.