Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 300 results by Eric Muyser
Re: [B3]B3Coin Hybrid POW/POS [Scrypt] - ANTI-INSTAMINE, NO PREMINE, NO ICO, NO IPO
In looking to this B3 fiasco, it's my opinion appears this community intends to mislead people into buying and borderline scammy activity, and here's why:
1. The increased supply to 650B makes it so that 1 sat per B3 gives a market cap of $110M USD. Double that for the sell being 2 sats.
`650,000,000,000 * 0.00000001 * 17000=110,500,000`
2. That's a huge jump from previous market cap, implying it was intentional. And many people in the community keep saying "oh use coinexchange it's a deal" or "we'll be back at $2 soon". No, it's not a deal, it's absurdly expensive. And no it won't be $2 soon because that would make it a 1.3 trillion dollar market cap. This went on from many people unchallenged in official channel. They would say yobit is expensive use coinexchange. Actually both are expensive.
2. It's not necessary to increase the token supply to do "kb3" - just call a group of 1000 a kb, simple. Why increase the cap? There's some spin about this but bottom line odd activity.
3. Why not coordinate with the exchanges better? Sigh. Coinexchange using a 1 sat minimum is misleading.
4. There appears to be something like 100B+ sell orders on coinexchange (14% of total), which could be a whale but seems likely to be devs "market making"? ie. allowing people to purchase at extremely high prices after being mislead. Or trying to stop the price from pumping. That's bs either way.
5. Lack of communication during this fiasco. Dev appears in chat but makes no response.
Obviously doing your own research is important, but what kind of community of 2000 people has no moderators or community members with morals?
1. The increased supply to 650B makes it so that 1 sat per B3 gives a market cap of $110M USD. Double that for the sell being 2 sats.
`650,000,000,000 * 0.00000001 * 17000=110,500,000`
2. That's a huge jump from previous market cap, implying it was intentional. And many people in the community keep saying "oh use coinexchange it's a deal" or "we'll be back at $2 soon". No, it's not a deal, it's absurdly expensive. And no it won't be $2 soon because that would make it a 1.3 trillion dollar market cap. This went on from many people unchallenged in official channel. They would say yobit is expensive use coinexchange. Actually both are expensive.
2. It's not necessary to increase the token supply to do "kb3" - just call a group of 1000 a kb, simple. Why increase the cap? There's some spin about this but bottom line odd activity.
3. Why not coordinate with the exchanges better? Sigh. Coinexchange using a 1 sat minimum is misleading.
4. There appears to be something like 100B+ sell orders on coinexchange (14% of total), which could be a whale but seems likely to be devs "market making"? ie. allowing people to purchase at extremely high prices after being mislead. Or trying to stop the price from pumping. That's bs either way.
5. Lack of communication during this fiasco. Dev appears in chat but makes no response.
Obviously doing your own research is important, but what kind of community of 2000 people has no moderators or community members with morals?
 WEBSITE | MEDIUM | TWITTER | TELEGRAM | FACEBOOK | WHITEPAPER Public Token Sale: November 10, 2018
Token Distribution Hardcap: $18.5 Million USD Softcap: $3 Million USD There will be a total of 1 Billion HBX tokens minted Token Sale 2018 30%, Private Sale 5%, Team and Advisors 30%, Partners and Developer Incentives 15%, Persistent Sale 10%, 2019 Sale 5%, 2020 Sale 5% Take Part in the 5,000,000 Airdrop! https://hyperbridge.org/airdrop  Hyperbridge was founded to empower creators and developers. By providing tools that allow creators to easily deploy blockchain-enabled projects, Hyperbridge is removing the barriers that limit contribution to the innovative process.  BlockHub is our digital distribution platform that is driven by decentralized protocols, which will be the home of a next-generation crowdfunding process. The BlockHub platform will unite producers and consumers by equipping developers to crowdfund, publish, and market their applications. Users of BlockHub will be able to find new and innovative titles within a vibrant marketplace, while also having the option to earn tokens and reputation by taking actions that support projects and the overall ecosystem. What Problems Does Hyperbridge Solve? Restricted competition in the gaming space The gaming industry rewards predictability, and limits competition from small developers. The risks and cost associated with successfully publishing a game title is high. Due to the saturation of franchised titles and sequels, often backed by substantial marketing budgets, smaller developers fight to gain visibility and market share. Indie gaming is a highly creative environment, but many of the developers in that space do not have access to the community, funding and marketing necessary for their games to compete. Crowdfunding is broken - current models are slow and charge high-fees Middle-man means higher fees: Traditional payment providers charge 2.9% + 30 cents for every single transaction, but is usually between 4.5% or 5%. (e.g. Kickstarter documents processing fees at 3% + .20 cents per pledge, but payments can fluctuate as high as 5%). Centralized crowdfunding models are limited in lowering fees go because they remain dependent on 3rd party payment providers (E.g. Paypal or Visa). Unfair Marketplace for Developers The current gaming industry operates on a centralized model. Large distribution platforms wield enormous power in the distribution and publishing of content. As a result they charge steep publishing fees and take a sizeable percentage of the profits. Developers with smaller sales volumes have to endure long periods to recoup their investments, and even run the risk of publishing at a net loss. Unable to Maintain Quality Control An issue with current digital distribution platforms is their inability to curate and manage the content they publish. Without curation, marketplaces become flooded with spam. With too much intervention, marketplaces are accused of censorship. The issue with current platforms is that a centralized authority is the one managing the marketplace, making the decisions about what users do and dont see.This isnt ideal, but is currently the best the industry has. Without a meaningful way for communities to decide on what they play, centralized authorities will continue to guess what their users want.  How BlockHub Works Supporting a competitive environment The BlockHub economy will support small developers by helping them manage the entirety of their project lifecycle from start to finish. Our tools will enable small developers by giving them access to the community, marketing and funding they need to compete. Ensuring a Fair and Sustainable Marketplace for Developers BlockHubs decentralized marketplace eliminates middlemen from the model. In their absence, BlockHubs protocols are designed to provide an economic benefit for independent developers, artists, and creators so they can fund, share, and distribute their work with far less friction. This means that developers receive a larger share of profits. BlockHub will also assist developers in establishing immutable digital rights and licensing, providing them with the tools, community and support to compete against larger studios who presently dominate the market. Next-generation, smart-contract driven Crowdfunding Smart contracts on a blockchain will facilitate the funding of game developer projects within the BlockHub ecosystem. BlockHub will use a standardized protocol for developers to propose project ideas, specify funding requirements, schedule milestones, and outline contribution tiers/incentives. BlockHub users will easily be able to contribute cryptocurrency to the projects they support, and provide them a platform to vote on the success of individual milestones.
Maintaining Quality Control BlockHub will maintain a higher standard of curation relative to centralized platfroms by using a decentralized model of reputation based community voting. Curators will be designated through the reputation they have gained through various platform actions. Active and prospective developers will also be structured into tiers based on their community-governed reputation to help maintain this quality. Developers who have a successful history of producing quality games on BlockHubs platform will have less restrictions for implementing future ideas. Unproven developers will be held to a higher level of scrutiny up until the point in time in which they gain reputation and prove that their intentions are in line with the mission and values of the ecosystem. Lastly, this environment will also be managed and directed by the community, through smart contracts to prevent spamming and to ensure a diverse and healthy game development atmosphere is maintained. Token holders will ultimately have the capacity to vote out content that doesnt meet their quality thresholds. Features Through various Software Development Kits (SDKs) and protocols embedded in BlockHub, developers can manage the entirety of their project lifecycle from start to finish.
 Crowdfunding           Twitter: https://twitter.com/hyperbridge Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/hyperbridge Telegram: https://medium.com/hyperbridge Medium: https://medium.com/hyperbridge Steemit: https://steemit.com/@hyperbridge Web: https://hyperbridge.org Whitepaper: https://hyperbridge.org/whitepaper Bounty: TBA |
I've been using Bitcoin since it was $50, and recently stopped. I don't like how much influence on the market and stigma of the crypto space it has, so I discontinue supporting it, at least for a while. If core gets their act together or some other fork, perhaps my faith can be renewed. Otherwise much better to just use Ethereum or something else.
Re: I will pay 0.3 BTC for an insurance policy against btc-e
To the naysayers, I'll say this. Do you have life insurance? A typical life insurance will pay 250K, and for that you pay ~100$ per year. Who wants to risk 250K for 100$ per year? Is this a joke? No, it's called insurance and it's based on probabilities.
Insurance companies don't escrow that 250K though. It comes out of their funds when needed. So a better analogy is an agreement to insure you, but not escrow the bitcoins. That is especially appropriate in an unsafe and unregulated market (unlike with an insurance company).
bump
Why are you bumping? Have you gotten a response from Friedcat? Would be good to get that before continuing.
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
Havelock doesn't execute self-trades; fun stuff. You can put the same wall on both sides of the order sheet.
BitFunder also lets you buy your own asks, so it looks like the stock price is rising or not falling (even when there's tons of selling off into the bids).
BTC TC is pretty solid on these sort of "exploits."
Stock can be bought at picostocks.com
https://picostocks.com/stocks/view/19
Buy before the next announcement or kick yourself.
https://picostocks.com/stocks/view/19
Buy before the next announcement or kick yourself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0QbXfvbjFk
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
Here's what I noticed
http://blockchain.info/block-index/400004/00000000000000919cffff6ed0b97f2323b262f9e2912a62ccd24cc3047191b3
Timestamp
2013-07-17 03:24:07
Received Time
2013-07-17 03:26:05
EVERY block solved by AM takes TWO MINUTES to get received into the network. That is about 4 times longer than most other nodes:
http://blockchain.info/block-index/400003/000000000000006319cd633a4f0ab60febbca002d4520fcfa57680ee2959fb5e
this one took just 30 seconds.
The longer it takes for a block to get distributed by the network, the more chance that it will end up orphaned. This is probably also the problem with the small number of transactions in AM blocks, it just takes too long for them to get to the AM farm!
http://blockchain.info/block-index/400004/00000000000000919cffff6ed0b97f2323b262f9e2912a62ccd24cc3047191b3
Timestamp
2013-07-17 03:24:07
Received Time
2013-07-17 03:26:05
EVERY block solved by AM takes TWO MINUTES to get received into the network. That is about 4 times longer than most other nodes:
http://blockchain.info/block-index/400003/000000000000006319cd633a4f0ab60febbca002d4520fcfa57680ee2959fb5e
this one took just 30 seconds.
The longer it takes for a block to get distributed by the network, the more chance that it will end up orphaned. This is probably also the problem with the small number of transactions in AM blocks, it just takes too long for them to get to the AM farm!
Somebody get AM some better pipes!
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
What's the hardware sales situation these days? I think I missed the relevant posts about this...
cranking out volumes hitting mega large radars worldwide, i'm telling you would not believe friedcats' followers on twitter #2 stock!~~~
Yawn. You don't need to attempt hyping AM with these pitiful one liners. They don't do anything (no one buys because you says it's #2 stock, you have no data to back up your claim). You and Elmore ASIC, act the same, yawn, registered within a minute of eachother.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99497.msg2707849#msg2707849
Re: ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It
Security Notice
Please trade ASICMINER shares via third-party escrow. There have been a significant double-sellings of shares so far.
Please trade ASICMINER shares via third-party escrow. There have been a significant double-sellings of shares so far.
Oh no!
Another reason to use passthroughs.
Doesn't this also logically mean there are people out there who think they have shares but do not? If the double selling is significant, it suggests the current price is undervalued.
Somebody placed a 250 shares buy order at btct (> 1000BTC) 
I'm curious to see if it is manipulation or not...
I'm curious to see if it is manipulation or not...
If that's for investment and not speculation then that person will be banging their head against the wall when they learn of DMS.SELLING. Costs 0.031 BTC per share and will be paying out around 0.008 BTC probably on Friday. Those 250 shares at 4.27 BTC each could purchase 34,435 shares of DMS.SELLING at 0.031 BTC each, which would make 275 BTC by this Saturday.
You can't buy 35k of DMS.SELLING at 0.031 because only like 293 are available at that price. It has no liquidity for a guy like that. In addition DMS.SELLING doesn't work like that. You're full of something, and it aint facts. You should really back up out of this thread slowly. Save some of your dignity Mabsark.
Just like he couldn't buy 250 AM shares because there wasn't 250 shares available at that price at that moment in time. There is however 38,454 shares outstanding so it is actually a possibility that someone could buy 35,000 shares for 0.031 BTC each.
..... Really? REALLY?? ? ?? Outstanding IS NOT EQUAL TO for sale. There's only 3341 DMS.SELLING for sale. There's 1541 AM for sale. He would only bring it up to 4.7 buying 250 of AM. He would bring it up to 0.053 buying DMS and STILL NOT FILL HIS ORDER. 0.053 is MUCH HIGHER than 0.031. 4.7 IS NOT MUCH HIGHER than 4.3. Do the math. Yeah, maybe it's possible IF HE WAITS A MILLION YEARS. If pigs fly and we're all cyborgs and other imaginary shit that may or may not come true but no reasonable person would ever use as an argument to base decisions on right now.
"I'm going to cut off my pigs legs and eat them for dinner, cause... they will fly.. eventually..."
"I'll lose my legs? It's okay.. I'll be a cyborg soon anyway."
I'm officially sold you are a troll of epic proportion. Sometimes it seems like you're speaking sense, like that AM is taking advantage of prices as a monopoly, but most times you're just a trollin AM hater.