OK, i have checked today, you can trade it by the contract address on EtherDelta, but price is really low. I hope it will be picked up in china as it is sort of aimed at that market, and the price will go up.

we will soon see a bitcoin breakout of the 200-300 $ range

I mean coins that were not ever mined but only existed as credits into an account at Bitstamp.

anyone?

This doesnt make sense... LTC price is going lower and the lower it is people would probably have a higher lot size

Why would bfx restrict it to 2k per order

That makes it incredibly annoying for someone who wants to do a 10k or 20k LTC order

The only winners in war are the bankers.

I know that there would have been a lot of stop losses from traders taking small short trades following exactly the same text-book rules as I was, but before I start ranting about exchange insiders intentionally going after these stops, I shall state this:

If there that many stop losses that mine simply got bumped to the very back of the queue. Why wasn't anyone 'served' before me? Why does the ticker for Bitfinex report this:

02:00:58 602.29      0.1
02:00:56 600.3        1.00626
02:00:55 608.13      319.168
02:00:24 600          255.374
02:00:17 599.91      0.01

Why wasn't there any trades executed at 601, 602, 603 etc, where there were plenty Ask orders in wall along this small range? Amongst the double and single digit Ask orders that stood in the way of $600 and $608, was a 100 BTC order at $604.99. Why wasn't that triggered at the price which the trader who made the order set it at? I bet that insofar as it was a real order, that the trader only got paid his $604.99 minus fees. I wish had taken a screenshot of the Bitfinex order book just a second before the short squeeze happened to illustrate and emphasise the situation to those who skim read and come to conclusions like: "well, of course stop losses will be closed with market orders"

If Bitfinex's policy with gluts of stop loss orders is to simply sweep up all the coins in the Ask wall required to fill the stops in a certain range, and then sell those coins to Stop Orders at highest possible price before Ask Wall depth recommences, then i am afraid that this is a form of front running and insider trading.

So where did all the Ask orders go between $600 and $608?

Does it sound plausible to you that there were indeed several hundred BTC worth of Ask orders in between $600 and $608?

If so, why was the market order triggered in it's 319 BTC entirety at $608? Does that not seem a bit strange to you?

Granted the insults and name calling isn't he right way to go about it, But an order closing past a stoploss, wtf?

Splendid stuff.  .  .  the tsunami is building,  and at a fair old rate.

Only fools try to stand in the way of a tsunami.

That breakout chart looks crazy. Those green candles look like penis in erection phase 

I wonder what effect the HODL mentality will have on volume.

It's nice to see some support building over the $600 levels.  Is it just me or do the bitcoinwisdom charts look different today?   All the numbers on the right look like they are a different font now or something...

Jup. Comic Sans for me. Which one did you get?

Having any significant portion of your holdings in DRK is a bad move at this point. It is currently trading higher than litecoin yet it has the same max coin structure, and litecoin has years of serious adoption behind it. This price is only temporary and due to the present lack of coins on the market because it is new. It is not becase of demand and there is practically no support on the orderbooks compared to that of litecoin. We have seen this a dozen times before with altcoin IPOs - these are just IPO prices. At some point the supply side will start getting dumped into the market and it will fall apart. Meanwhile, people are desperately trying to pump it with rumors of being added of being added to bitfinex. And the other day its very fundamentals were called into question as it forked, setting the stage for a different more reliable altcoin to take its place even.

Serious question, for a second:

Does anybody know how much of Bitfinex' volume (on average) is routed to Bitstamp?

Bitstamp's API returns total volume (i.e. their own volume + orders from Bitfinex). Bitfinex' API doesn't distinguish between orders executed "internally" and "externally" either, to my knowledge.

The result is, we can't say for sure how much of the volume on stamp on finex is a duplicate... Can anyone who trades a lot on finex shine some light on this? Maybe you know how much, approximately, is routed to stamp, so we can at least guess how much stamp's volume has to be discounted.

is it true that you are implementing Darkcoin to trade with ?