In my opinion, potential investors are not looking for good projects in social networks, but go to specialized forums such as this one. Therefore, I think that for advertising the project INVECH you need to use all the possibilities.

It should be noted that ethereum also does not stand still, but develops and improves. This is evidenced by the recent five improvements to the ethereum network, as well as two more stages of such improvements, scheduled for the end of this or the beginning of the next year.

In any case, it is very noble to help this state with foreign investment, and with financing agriculture, as well as tourism, on the part of the INVECH team.

This site also states that 500 million tokens of IV will be released. During the first phase of distribution, it is planned to sell 75 million, while the second phase - 100 million tokens. Unsold tokens will be transferred to the Timor Leste Foundation - INVECH with a three-year grant period. Do you mean tokens that may not be sold during the first and second distribution phases? Or is it the difference between the 500 million tokens released and those that will not be sold during IEO? And what will happen next with these tokens?

If you use some kind of common white paper from other projects as a sample, I see nothing wrong with that. This cannot be considered plagiarism.
As for marketing in IEO projects, investors, in any case, should learn about such projects from somewhere. The only exception may be cases when large investors appear as a result of private negotiations.

IEO projects have their advantages, but there are also disadvantages. It seems to me that we will return to the ICO projects all the same, however, when they are regulated and protected from fraudsters by state bodies. This is still the simplest and most accessible form of fundraising and distribution of new tokens.

An interesting turn of events. ICO projects have recently collected their funds for a very long time, they extend the duration of an ICO to six to eight months. And that, while barely surviving. IEO projects have appeared and sell their tokens in literally seconds. The problem is to have time to buy.

The Invech Group is a licensed campaign by the government of Timor-Leshpi and is designed to solve the problems of foreign investment, reduce unemployment in the country, tokenize tourism and agriculture, and also solve other problems. That is, since the assigned tasks are among the issues to be solved by the government, it supports this project.

No technical tests for cryptocurrency will give you anything. Now no one can even say with confidence whether the cryptocurrency market will grow in these last months of this year. I remember what technical analyzes were at the beginning of this year about Bitcoin growth to 40,000 and 60,000 dollars. Where are these forecasts now? Something about them is not heard. While we have hope for the growth of Bitcoin and another cryptocurrency, there is, however, very little. It was already November, and the course of Bitcoin is surprisingly very stable.

Of course, KYC data leakage will occur even when ICO projects and their teams are normal, with no signs of fraud. After all, they are not at all interested in keeping our confidential data. For them, this data is generally useless.
As long as the activities of the ICO will not be regulated by the state, there will be no order in it.
In addition, the KYC check is generally illegal for bounty hunters, since we are not investors in ICO projects.

In my opinion, the price indicator is not yet an indicator of the state of development of a certain type of cryptocurrency. The fact that ethereum has now fallen in price to $ 200, I do not think that its usefulness has fallen from this. Most likely, there is the usual manipulation of the market. Personally, I rate ethereum much higher than its current price. After a while this coin will grow in popularity very much.

I join this opinion about the dangers of transferring their confidential data to ICO teams that are unknown to us, which can place photographs of any other persons as their ICO team.
In addition, it is generally illegal to require ICO generosity campaigners to pass KYC checks. Bounty hunters are not investors, only those who invest their money should be tested by KYC, because its main task is to prevent the laundering of dirty money.

From a legal point of view, Bitcoin cannot be considered a private currency because a patent for the invention of Bitcoin is not registered for any private individual.
However, Bitcoin can rightly be called a private currency in everyday conversations from the point of view that it will be used primarily by individuals. In my opinion, states and legal entities will not use bitcoin widely due to its high level of volatility.

Then you, as a bounty hunter, must both meet your clients - the ICO team and take the KYC verification from them. After all, the client is always the one who pays his money and therefore proves that his money is not "dirty." This is the point of checking KYC. Therefore, investors who invest their funds, as a general rule, are tested by KYC, in case some states are interested in a particular person and the origin of his funds.
Bounty hunters should have no relation to the KYC verification.

And why should a ripple coin be considered shit? Just because it primarily serves the banking system and is centralized? In any case, I think that this coin deserves respect, since it performs very useful functions in the same banking structure, and therefore is useful for people. We should not oppose cryptocurrency and banks, in the end they will be forced to work together. I also read that the ripple is also quite successfully used in some countries as a means of payment for the purchase of goods and the provision of services.

I do not think that the ethereum price will drop below the current 204 dollars. Is that for a very short time. Now there is a lot of good information that will affect the increase in the popularity and price of ethereum. These are planned improvements to it, and the fact that WBTC tokens appear, which will be equal to one bitcoin, and WBCH, which will be equal to one bitcoin in cash. They will work on the ethereum network, which means that the popularity of this coin will increase.

No, I think that non-cash forms of payment, on the contrary, will only develop. Most likely, Bitcoin will also be served with bank cards and in my country it is already practiced. Bitcoin can be transferred to such a card, but it is no longer possible to withdraw it from the card. The card shows the amount in Bitcoin, although in fact it is displayed immediately by the bank. At any time, the duration of Bitcoin can be converted to another currency directly on the card and make a purchase. In principle, it is quite convenient.

In fact, stable coins are very convenient to use. Sometimes it becomes necessary to simply withdraw funds from cryptocurrency, but without transferring them to fiat. This may be, for example, when the cryptocurrency begins to fall in price. Or it is just necessary to withdraw it urgently for transfer to another coin, however, it’s not yet time to convert to another coin. Or you need to convert to a certain coin, and there is no direct pair for exchange. Such cases can be many. Therefore, in these cases, stable coins are irreplaceable.

If all states switch to the use of cryptocurrencies, which can never happen in reality, then very interesting events will really begin. The economies of countries will unbalance quickly, and complete economic chaos will begin. I think that such an experiment will end quickly and everything will again fall into place with a return to their national money.

Almost every state has its own national money, which interacts with the economy of this state. Each state seeks to strengthen its currency and with this it strengthens its economy. It seems to me quite normal. The state simply cannot switch to using the currency of another state or cryptocurrency, which will not interact with the economy of this particular state. This will lead to the imbalance of economic indicators of the state. At the international level, states can agree on the use of a single currency, because this single currency will eventually be recalculated as a result of national money. However, the state will not be able to fully switch to the use of other people's money.