Thoughtfully on the other hand we can put efforts to invest as wide as possible but should always do our research and get our findings right about any asset b for moving onto investing in it and if it's the right asset with potential for huge profits maybe investing excessively might not be that bad because the returns will be coming in massively in the future after a waiting period.

There are CEX that are aimed to rip their customers and take advantage of their ignorance to make outrageous profit. We should avoid such exchanges when we notice such behaviours. If it were me I would close that account and stop using that exchange and even go on telling my friends and colleagues about them for them to stay off. They knew the right fees to charge but were playing a smart one, that's a red flag generally.

Akin to the saying that excess of everything is bad,  this also logically applies to Bitcoin investment, I know that it's good to try to increase your stash of Bitcoin as much as possible, but let it not be done at the detriment of your ability to finance your daily lives, that's why you must cut your coat according to your size, invest only what you can do away with for a very long time, not an amount that will compel you to temper with your holdings later.
And not saying that investing aggressively is bad, no, it's only bad if you don't have the leverage to do so, because if you do so when you can't afford it, it would be just a matter of time before you temper with your holdings.

This can't be lucky for Manchester City it was a well deserved victory after conceding early 2 goals which I was thinking that at best Manchester City can only fight for a draw but they outperformed my anticipation. KDB as they call him is a wonder player and his support to Manchester City victories in comeback games as this one of today can't be numbered. They are now increasing their hopes of a champions league spot and this is beautiful.

I wouldn't rule it completely as a terrible idea, it all depends on the terms and conditions of the loan, because he needs to first forget about paying back the loan from his Bitcoin investment, the loan can be payed back from another source, once his paycheck arrives, but if the interest rate is low and it will be payed back in an installment manner, it's not a terrible idea in my own opinion because he can get a huge chunk of Bitcoin at once with the money borrowed, but if his intentions is to trade with the money borrowed, that is what am going to kick against because for you to be able to control your emotions you must trade with an amount you can afford to lose, and I am sure that he can't afford to lose the borrowed money on trading, so taking a loan to trade is a terrible idea in my own opinion unlike investment in Bitcoin that the risk is very minimal.

I do wish too that Trump can go ahead and issue an executive order on this matter for the bitcoin reserve to become a reality but on the other hand issues of such economic importance doesn't work this way as we all wish it to. Trump of all people do understand this as far as the constitution exists and that's where he would have to follow the right channel to have it all done if he is determined to have a US bitcoin reserve in place. The congressional House do have a big role on this because it's all about the economic future of the people of the USA.

On Wednesday night Barcelona FC had a mind-blowing victory after going 2 goals behind Benfica in a 3:1 result in the 1st half of the match.  Back to the 2nd half Barca got motivated and turned the table around finishing the game with a 4:5 result with the goal to victory made in by Raphinha.

And tonight we have another special match, the one between PSG vs Manchester city. Both team's haven't been with a good record in this season's Uefa championship despite their echelon status in nearby years in this competition. A victory for any side will mean them going up on the table and increasing their chances of making it to the next stage of the competition.

But am predicting this match to finish in a draw or a 1 goal win for any one of the both sides. How about you what are your expectations from the match tonight?

A business man and a politician in one person some of the things he does for profits shouldn't be unexpected. The thing is that D. Trump has always known when and how to dress for the party and taking advantage of every open opportunity, in all of these it has always worked for him. Here's another memecoin project of his and shocking enough he holds 80% of the tokens which clearly means that a significant dump has to come from his wing


Alright no clear evidence, but has he come on air to debunk his involvement with the memecoin? I remember when his family member twitter account was hacked and used to promote a certain project in march 2024 it didn't take hours before that news was debunked as anything related to the Trump's and immediately it was brought down. So we not getting any statement of him distancing himself from this token till now is an evidence on the contrary.

Right now no single crypto person that is not aware of the $trump memecoin launched on SOL network which has not only seen the token soar with hours but has in like manner invariably giving solana some fresh air and attraction.

It is still fresh in our minds the campaign promises D.Trump sold to the public and in particular the bitcoin community that led to the mind-boggling  and overbearing support he got from bitcoiners across the States and outside.

Surfing through I couldn't see where he talked or discussed about the launch of $trump token and he did with bitcoin wherever he went. Maybe I missed it, anyone could point that to me please.

On that pedestal I have been thinking, trying to process certain items in my head. Did  D. Trump used bitcoin as a means to achieve his political ambition with a preemptive plan to later use that influence to launch a token of his? A means to an end, who knows!

To now that he has launched the $trump token, where would his priority lies in the future. Bitcoin or his memecoin? This is something to think about the future of bitcoin and the trump effect, what does this make for the latest development.

Can't tell precisely but it could be that it hurts most in my ass the passage to your brains.

Was there a place in my post I said the neutral pains me or you just decided to come make fun of real matters to attract a good boy attention?

lovesmayfamilis, thanks for your words, I'll keep that in mind and work on it.

is one year not sufficient to know about many things in this community or except for a member too daft to learn. I have a challenge which I am aware of right from the day I registered as member of this community, the challenge of not having time to regularly visit the forum due to my busy engagements with my nature of job. The little time I scarcely get to come visit is either to read through important topics of interest and leave.

 or make a comment or post where I have the time to, and my next comeback is what I have never being guaranteed if it will be the next day. Do your checks critically before making assumptions. Thank you.

You saying you will be glad to revise the feedback if a situation occurs. For a situation that can only be determined by your very satisfaction. You expect I rely on that?

How you chose to question my reaction about your action is left to you. From what I have read in the forum about the categories of different tags the neutral trust is not one of a good sign on a forum member account profile hence my reaction.

I will sleep on your words and not get worried anymore than I have. I do appreciate you on this exposure.

Taking a risk in the hopes of getting live changing results but ending to be a loss or failure is pretty bad in my view more than when I have to play safe made some profits when I could have made more if I had not played safe. In the second a profit was made irrespective of how small it is it's still better than making nothing as it is in the first question after imputing resourceful energy, time and money.

oh really!!! You admit it's unnecessary yet you call it his right. So it's a right of old members of the forum to do anything they wish on newbie members account even when it's obviously unnecessary as you had admitted. This is bs.

Like what happened to send me a message privately informing me about what he has observed if his real intentions was to put me in order since he knows am just a newbie and may not be exempted from some newbie shortcomings. In that way it would have shown his true  thoughts is to really be in my best interest. But this neutral which you have clearly admitted it to be unnecessary is nothing in my best interest from him but just to serve some ego.

Like what's going on here.

I am glad you call it an opinion because that's exactly what it is. And as opinion it shouldn't come with a verdict not even a neutral feedback if that's what it's called. I am not upset to have anybody express their opinion in my thread because it a positive or negative opinion but leaving a neutral feedback on my profile is extreme.

If my submitting my posts to fillipone thread makes me a merit seeker as Mr jollygood suggest what then does it makes of all those other users in that thread?  How does his reason for the neutral makes sense  except that he feels he could give out as he wish and nothing will happen.

This is ridiculous. How can you Mr Jollygood just make up such a wit from nowhere and accuse a person of what is not. How is it now a crime to have my posts submitted on a thread where every other member is doing same? Or Is it just something about you to go about tagging new members blending to be a part and parcel of this community struggling to make out time out of their busy engagements.

I didn't know it was a huge crime in this community for a member to express their thoughts making a speculation about bitcoin price and which has to be determined by Mr jollygood as arbiter if the speculation serves a purpose or not. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5521247.msg64884125#msg64884125

I am aware am just growing in the forum and may have some lapses  to learn from but in this matter I do take it as a witch-hunt from Mr jollygood. There's no good justification to the tag am seeing on my profile.

Oh really? I didn't noticed that Mohamed Salah wasn't outstanding in his club in the December too. Man, Salah scored interesting goals that were out of this world, as in points saving goals for Liverpool and if it's creativity, Salah is far creative onnthe pitch than Isak, you vwn bet on that. But if you want to tell me it's the choice of the voters that made Isak come out the month prize winner then that sounds understandable but I still think Salah deserved it more.

You can't blame them JJG, some of this folks don't actually know the demarcation between bitcoin and cryptocurrency and that can be pointed to common insufficient knowledge about the phenomena. And for a newbie who isn't careful to have self-studied to know their difference it could be confusing having to read those vague terms.

It's high time people get to put effort to be specific, if they want to talk bitcoin then it should be bitcoin all through their statement, and when they want to talk shitcoins they should also stay that way and not confuse the two, most importantly in this thread that is a dominant topic of discuss on bitcoin.

Alexander Isak has been fantastic this season with Newcastle for sure but I was thinking that Salah of Liverpool actually deserves this prize more than Isak do. I mean Mohamed Salah has made a superior performance than Isak having scored 7 goals with 7 assists in December with his team as leaders of the premier league table, while Isak had 8 goals with just 2 assists and that's for me not so good despite how fine Isak has performed Salah stats appear to be better than his for December.