Search content
Sort by
Showing 5 of 5 results by Finsterkamm
Re: Baikal X10 ⚡OVERCLOCK⚡ Claim reward 0.2 BTC for TUTORIAL HOW TO :)⚡⚡⚡⚡
@CNoteFan:
It's hardly ever possible. Most likely developers are sitting on PC doing cross-development for OrangePi.
After that they release image for flashing there only binaries residues. No even traces of source code.
It's hardly ever possible. Most likely developers are sitting on PC doing cross-development for OrangePi.
After that they release image for flashing there only binaries residues. No even traces of source code.
Re: Baikal X10 ⚡OVERCLOCK⚡ Claim reward 0.2 BTC for TUTORIAL HOW TO :)⚡⚡⚡⚡
Have any proof of that? 
Of course we can slip into speculation that since Baikal-T1 fabricated on TMSC, than there is a big chance that they ordered "something else" just some sort of collateral product. And this is exactly the ASICs we are talking of.
Of course we can slip into speculation that since Baikal-T1 fabricated on TMSC, than there is a big chance that they ordered "something else" just some sort of collateral product. And this is exactly the ASICs we are talking of. Re: Baikal X10 ⚡OVERCLOCK⚡ Claim reward 0.2 BTC for TUTORIAL HOW TO :)⚡⚡⚡⚡
Do you think those Baikal miners not based on this silicon chip?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baikal_CPU
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baikal_CPU
May be it makes sense to rewrite whole bitcoin kernel using some modern language, like Ethereum did already?
Or favor C++14 and get rid of Boost library?
Or favor C++14 and get rid of Boost library?